Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:50:00.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Actinocrinitidae from the Lower Mississippian Fort Payne Formation of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama (Crinoidea, Viséan)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2016

Elizabeth C. Rhenberg ,
William I. Ausich  and
David L. Meyer
Elizabeth C. Rhenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Earlham College, 801 National Road West, Richmond, IN 47374-4095, USA 〈[email protected]〉
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, 155 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 〈[email protected]〉
David L. Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA 〈[email protected]〉
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Actinocrinitidae were among the most abundant crinoids worldwide during the Lower Mississippian. Recent systematic revisions of the family allow a revised genus- and species-level understanding of these crinoids globally and a more precise means by which to understand the temporal and facies distribution of genera and species in this important Mississippian family. Two genera with a total of five species of Actinocrinitidae (and five additional forms left in open nomenclature) are recognized from the Fort Payne Formation, including Actinocrinites jugosus (Hall, 1859), Actinocrinites spp. indeterminate, Thinocrinus gibsoni (Miller and Gurley, 1893), Thinocrinus lowei (Hall, 1858), Thinocrinus probolos (Ausich and Kammer, 1991), Thinocrinus akanthos new species, Thinocrinus sp. aff. T. gibsoni, Thinocrinus spp. indeterminate, and two taxa recognized as only Actinocrinitidae genus and species indeterminate. Actinocrinites tripus Ehlers and Kesling, 1963 is recognized as a junior synonym of Thinocrinus gibsoni. Thinocrinus, rather than Actinocrinites as previously thought, is the dominant Fort Payne Formation actinocrinitid. Fort Payne Formation carbonate buildup facies (wackestone buildups and crinoidal packstone buildups) each have characteristic species of Thinocrinus. Actinocrinites is relatively rare in the Fort Payne Formation, but occurs preferentially in crinoidal packstone buildups.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , November 2016 , pp. 1148 - 1159
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ausich, W.I., 1980, A model for niche differentiation in Lower Mississippian crinoid communities: Journal of Paleontology, v. 54, p. 273–288.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1983, Component concept for the study of paleocommunities with an example from the Early Carboniferous of southern Indiana: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 44, p. 251–282.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 1999, Lower Mississippian Edwardsville Formation at Crawfordsville, Indiana, USA, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.J. Fossil Crinoids, Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, p. 145–154.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 2009, A critical evaluation of the status of crinoids studied by Dr. Gerard Troost (1776–1850): Journal of Paleontology, v. 83, p. 484–488.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Kammer, T.W., 1991, Late Osagean and Meramecian Actinocrinites from the Mississippian stratotype region (Echinodermata: Crinoidea): Journal of Paleontology, v. 65, p. 485–499.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Kammer, T.W., 2006, Stratigraphic and Geographic Distribution of Lower Carboniferous Crinoidea from England and Wales: Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, v. 56, p. 91–109.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Lane, N.G., 1980, Platform communities and rocks of the Borden Siltstone Delta (Mississippian) along the south shore of Monroe Reservoir, Monroe County, Indiana, in Shaver, R.H., ed., Field Trips 1980 from the Indiana University Campus, Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, p. 36–67.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Lane, N.G., 1982, Crinoids from the Edwardsville Formation (Lower Mississippian) of Indiana: Journal of Paleontology, v. 56, p. 1343–1361.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Lane, N.G., 1985, Crinoid assemblages and geographic endemism in the Lower Mississippian (Carboniferous) crinoids of the continental interior, in Dutro Jr., J.T., and Pfefferkorn, H.W., eds., Neuvième Congres International de Stratigraphie et de Gèologie du Carbonifère, Compte Rendu, vol. 5: Paleontology, Paleoecology, Paleogeography, Carbondale, Illinois, Southern Illinois University Press, p. 216–224.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Meyer, D.L., 1988, Blastoids from the late Osagean Fort Payne Formation (Kentucky and Tennessee): Journal of Paleontology, v. 62, p. 269–283.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Meyer, D.L., 1990, Origin and composition of carbonate buildups and associated facies in the Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian, south-central Kentucky): an integrated sedimentologic and paleoecologic analysis: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 102, p. 129–146.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Meyer, D.L., 1992, Crinoidea Flexibilia (Echinodermata) from the Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian; Kentucky and Tennessee): Journal of Paleontology, v. 66, p. 825–838.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Sevastopulo, G.D., 2001, Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian) crinoids from Hook Head, County Wexford, Ireland: Monograph of the Palaeontographical Society, v. 617, 136 p.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Simms, M.J., 1999, Ecology and ecological interactions, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.J. Fossil Crinoids, Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, p. 55–59.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W, and Meyer, D.L., 1997, Middle Mississippian disparid crinoids from the east-central United States: Journal of Paleontology, v. 71, p. 131–148.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., Hess, H., and Simms, M.J., 1999, Crinoid form and function, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.J. Fossil Crinoids, Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press, p. 3–30.Google Scholar
Austin, T. Sr., and Austin, T. Jr., 1842, XVIII. Proposed arrangement of the Echinodermata, particularly as regards the Crinoidea, and a subdivision of the Class Adelostella (Echinidae): Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 1, v. 10, no. 63, p. 106–113.Google Scholar
Bassler, R.S., and Moodey, M.W., 1943, Bibliographic and faunal index of Paleozoic pelmatozoan echinoderms: Geological Society of America Special Paper, no. 45, 734 p.Google Scholar
Bronn, H.G., 1848–1849, Index palaeontologicus, unter Mitwirking der Herren Prof. H. R. Göppert und H. von Meyer: Handbuch einer Geschichte der Nature, v. 5, Abt. 1, (1, 2), pt. 3, A. Nomenclator Palaeontologicus; A-M, p. 1–775; N-Z, p. 776–1381, Stuttgart, E. Schweizerbart.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.M., 1909, The beginnings of dependent life: New York State Museum Annual Report, v. 4, p. 146–169.Google Scholar
Clarke, J.M., 1921, Early parasitism of the snails upon the crinoids, in Clarke, J.M. Organic Dependence and Disease, their origin and significance: New York State Museum, Bulletin (1919), v. 221–222, p. 64–78. http://nysl.cloudapp.net/awweb/main.jsp?flag=collection&smd=1&cl=all_lib&lb_document_id=54811&tm=1466979863780 Google Scholar
Dacqué, E., 1921, Vergleichende biologische Formenkunde der fossilen niederen Tiere, Berlin, Bornträger, 777 p.Google Scholar
Ehlers, G.M., and Kesling, R.B., 1963, Two new crinoids from Lower Mississippian rocks in southeastern Kentucky: Journal of Paleontology, v. 37, p. 1028–1041.Google Scholar
Gahn, F.J., and Baumiller, T.K., 2006, Using platyceratid gastropod behavior to test functional morphology: Historical Biology, v. 18, p. 397–404.Google Scholar
Grabau, A.W., and Shimer, H.W., 1910, North American Index Fossils, Invertebrates, New York, A.G. Seiler & Co., 909 p.Google Scholar
Greb, S.F., Potter, P.E., Meyer, D.L., and Ausich, W.I., 2008, Mud mounds, paleoslumps, crinoids, and more; the geology of the Fort Payne Formation at Lake Cumberland, south-central Kentucky: Field trip for the Kentucky Chapter of the American Institute of Professional Geologists. Kentucky Geological Survey. Online Publication, http://www.ky.aipg.org/GUIDEBOOKS/2008%20Guidebook.pdf (accessed April 2016).Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1858, Chapter 8. Palaeontology of Iowa, in Hall, J., and Whitney, J.D., Report of the Geological Survey of the state of Iowa embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 56 and 57, v. 1, pt. II; Palaeontology: p. 473–724. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.31802 Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1859, Contributions to the palaeontology of Iowa, being descriptions of new species of Crinoidea and other fossils: Supplement to v. I, pt, II, of the Geological Report of Iowa, 92 p.Google Scholar
Haugh, B.N., 1973, Water vascular system of the Crinoidea Camerata: Journal of Paleontology, v. 47, p. 77–90.Google Scholar
Kammer, T.W., and Ausich, W.I., 2006, The “Age of Crinoids”: a Mississippian biodiversity spike coincident with widespread carbonate ramps: Palaios, v. 21, p. 236–248.Google Scholar
Kammer, T.W., Ausich, W.I., and Lane, N.G., 1983, Paleontology and stratigraphy of the Borden delta of southern Indiana and northern Kentucky, in Shaver, R.H., and Sunderman, J.A., eds., Field Trips in Midwestern Geology, vol. 1: Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana University, p. 37–71.Google Scholar
Kammer, T.W., Brenckle, P.L., Carter, J.L., and Ausich, W.I., 1990, Redefinition of the Osagean-Meramecian boundary in the Mississippian stratotype region: Palaios, v. 5, p. 414–431.Google Scholar
Keyes, C.R., 1894, Paleontology of Missouri, part I: Missouri Geological Survey, v. 4, p. 143–225.Google Scholar
Khetani, A.B., and Read, J.F., 2002, Sequence development of a mixed carbonate-siliciclastic high-relief ramp, Mississippian, Kentucky, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 72, p. 657–672.Google Scholar
Krause, R.A., and Meyer, D.L., 2004, Sequence stratigraphy and depositional dynamics of carbonate buildups and associated facies from the Lower Mississippian Fort Payne Formation of southern Kentucky, U.S.A. Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 74, p. 831–844.Google Scholar
Krause, R.A. Jr., Meyer, D.L., and Ausich, D.L., 2002, Carbonate buildups in the Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian) Cumberland County, Kentucky, in Ettensohn, F.R., and Smath, M.L., eds., Guidebook for Geology Field Trips in Kentucky and Adjacent Areas, 2002 Joint Meeting of the North-Central Section and Southeastern Section of the Geological Society of America, Lexington, Lexington, University of Kentucky, p. 1–13.Google Scholar
Krivicich, E.B., Ausich, W.I., and Keyes, R.G., 2013, Crinoidea from the Fort Payne Chert of north-central Alabama and south-central Tennessee (Phylum Echinodermata; Mississippian): Southeastern: Geology, v. 49, p. 133–143.Google Scholar
Krivicich, E.B., Ausich, W.I., and Meyer, D.L., 2014, Crinoid assemblages from the Fort Payne Formation (late Osagean, early Viséan, Mississippian) from Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama: Journal of Paleontology, v. 88, p. 1154–1162.Google Scholar
Lane, N.G., 1973, Paleontology and paleoecology of the Crawfordsville fossil site (Upper Osagian: Indiana) with sections by Matthews, J.L., Driscoll, E.G., and Yochelson, E.L. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences, v. 99, 147 p.Google Scholar
Lane, N.G., 1978, Mutualistic relations of fossil crinoids, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt T. Echinodermata 2: Boulder and Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p. T345–T347.Google Scholar
Laudon, L.R., 1948, Osage-Meramec contact: Journal of Geology, v. 56, p. 288–302.Google Scholar
Laudon, L.R., 1973, Stratigraphic crinoid zonation in Iowa Mississippian rocks: Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, v. 80, p. 25–33.Google Scholar
Leslie, S.A., Ausich, W.I., and Meyer, D.L., 1996, Lower Mississippian sedimentation dynamics and conodont biostratigraphy (lowermost Fort Payne Formation along the southeastern margin of the Eastern Interior Seaway): Southeastern Geology, v. 36, p. 27–35.Google Scholar
Lewis, R.Q., and Potter, P.E., 1978, Surface rocks in the western Lake Cumberland area, Clinton, Russell, and Wayne Counties, Kentucky: Guidebook and Roadlog for Geological Society of Kentucky 1978 Field Conference: Kentucky Geological Survey, ser, v. 11, 41 p.Google Scholar
Meyer, D.L., and Ausich, W.I., 1997, Morphologic variation within and between populations of the camerate crinoid Agaricocrinus (Lower Mississippian, Kentucky and Tennessee): Breaking the spell of the mushroom: Journal of Paleontology, v. 71, p. 896–917.Google Scholar
Meyer, D.L., and Ausich, W.I., (with contributions by Bohl, D.T. and Norris, W.A.) 2009, Fort Payne Carbonate facies (Mississippian) of south central Kentucky: Field trip guide, NAPC, Cincinnati, Ohio, 33 p.Google Scholar
Meyer, D.L., Ausich, W.I., and Terry, R.E., 1989, Comparative taphonomy of echinoderms in carbonate facies: Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian) of Kentucky and Tennessee: Palaios, v. 4, p. 533–572.Google Scholar
Meyer, D.L., Ausich, W.I, Bohl, D.T, Norris, W.A., and Potter, P.E., 1995, Carbonate mud-mounds in the Fort Payne Formation (lower Carboniferous), Cumberland Saddle region, Kentucky and Tennessee, USA: Special Publications International Association of Sedimentologists, no. 23, p. 273–287.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A Natural History of the Crinoidea or lily-shaped animals, with observations on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula, and Marsupites , Bristol, Bryan and Co., 150 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1889, North American Geology and Paleontology: Cincinnati, Western Methodist Book Concern, 664 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., 1897, Second appendix to North American geology and palaeontology: p. 719–793.Google Scholar
Miller, S.A., and Gurley, W.F.E., 1893, Description of some new species of invertebrates from the Palaeozoic rocks of Illinois and adjacent states: Illinois State Museum Bulletin, v. 3, 81 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Papers, no. 46, 153 p.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1944, Class Crinoidea, in Shimer, H.W., and Shrock, R.R. Index Fossils of North America, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, p. 137–209.Google Scholar
Oji, T., 2001, Fossil record of echinoderm regeneration with special regard to crinoids: Microscopy Research and Technique, v. 55, p. 397–402.Google Scholar
Rhenberg, E.C., Ausich, W.I., and Kammer, T.W., 2015, Generic concepts in the Actinocrinitidae Austin and Austin, 1842 and re-evaluation of generic assignments: Journal of Paleontology, v. 88, p. 1–16.Google Scholar
Rowley, R.R., 1906, Description of fossils, in Greene, G.K.. Contribution to Indiana Palaeontology, New Albany, Indiana, Ewing and Zeller Printers, v. 2, p. 27–31.Google Scholar
Shumard, B.F., 1865, Catalogue of Palaeozoic fossils, Part 1, Echinodermata: Transactions of the St. Louis Academy Science, v. 2, no. 2, p. 334–394.Google Scholar
Shumard, B.F., 1868, A catalogue of the Palaeozoic fossils of North America. Part I. Paleozoic Echinodermata: Transactions of the St. Louis Academy of Science (1866), v. 2, p. 334–407.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.R., and Ausich, W.I., 2016, Facies distribution and taphonomy of echinoids from the Fort Payne Formation (late Osagean, early Viséan, Mississippian of Kentucky: Journal of Paleontology, 90, p. 239–249. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.46 Google Scholar
Troost, G., 1849, Geographical survey of Tennessee: American Journal of Science, series 2, v. 8, p. 419–420.Google Scholar
Troost, G., 1850a, A list of the fossil crinoids of Tennessee: American Association for the Advancement of Science, Proceedings (1849), series 2, v. 8, p. 59–64.Google Scholar
Troost, G., 1850b, Monograph on crinoids discovered in the state of Tennessee: Unpublished, 95 p.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978a, General morphology, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt T. Echinodermata 2, Boulder and Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p. T58–T216.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978b, Suborder Compsocrinina Ubaghs, new suborder, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt T. Echinodermata 2, Boulder and Lawrence, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, p. T440–T487.Google Scholar
Van Sant, J.F., 1964, Crawfordsville crinoids, in Van Sant, J.F., and Lane, N.G. 1964, Crawfordsville (Indiana) crinoid studies: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata, Article no. 7, p. 34–136.Google Scholar
Van Tuyl, F.M., 1925, The stratigraphy of the Mississippian formations of Iowa: Geological Survey Iowa, 30th Annual Report, (1921–1922), p. 33–374.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1880–1886, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Pt. I. The families Ichthyocrinidae and Cyathocrinidae (1880), p. 226–378 (separate re-paged p. 1–153). Pt. II. Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881), p. 177–411, (separate re-paged, p. 1–237). Pt. III, Sec. 1. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1885), p. 225–364 (separate re-paged, 1–138). Pt. III, Sec. 2. Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusion of the generic descriptions (1886), p. 64–226 (separate re-paged to continue with section 1, 139–302).Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1897, The North American Crinoidea Camerata: Harvard College Museum of Comparative Zoology, Memoir, v. 20, p. 1–359. v. 21. p. 360–897.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1973, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1942–1968: Geological Society of America, Memoir, v. 137, 341 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1977, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1969–1973: Geological Society of America, Microform Publication, v. 8, 235 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1986, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1974–1980: Geological Society of America, Microform Publication, v. 16, 405 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., 1993, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, 1986–1990: Geological Society of America, Microform Publication, v. 25, 204 p.Google Scholar
Webster, G.D., and Webster, D.W., 2014, Bibliography and index of Paleozoic crinoids, coronates, and hemistreptocrinoids, 1758–2012. Pullman, Washington, published by the author, 2694 p. http://crinoids.azurewebsites.net/ (accessed April 2016).Google Scholar
Weller, S., 1898, A bibliographic index of Carboniferous invertebrates: U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin, v. 153, 653 p.Google Scholar
Worthen, A.H., 1890, Description of fossil invertebrates: Illinois Geological Survey, v. 8, pt. 2, sec. 1, p. 69–154.Google Scholar
Wright, J., 1947, Steganocrinus westheadi n. sp. and note on a rare crinoid and a blastoid from the Carboniferous Limestone of Coplow Knoll, Clitheroe: Geological Magazine, v. 84, p. 101–105.Google Scholar