Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:12:22.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiscale ENC Data Management on an Archipelagic Sea Area – Example of the East Adriatic Coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2007

Tea Duplančić Leder*
Affiliation:
(Hydrographic Institute of the Republic of Croatia, Croatia)
Nenad Leder
Affiliation:
(Hydrographic Institute of the Republic of Croatia, Croatia)
Miljenko Lapaine
Affiliation:
(University of Zagreb, Croatia)
*

Abstract

This paper briefly outlines the production of electronic nautical charts (ENC) as a digital nautical chart, produced by the Croatian National Hydrographic Office (HO) to International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) specifications S-57 Edition 3.1. The production of ENCs is based on the theory of multiscale data management (usage bands). Multiple representations of ENC data are controlled by scale minimum (SCAMIN) attributes. A solution to the problem of multiscale data management as a part of ENC data production for archipelagic sea areas, using the East Adriatic Coast as an example is presented. This solution is based on a long-standing experience in the production of paper charts and recent ENC production for the eastern coast of the Adriatic Sea, which is believed to be the second largest archipelagic area in the Mediterranean. Finally, a new usage band scale range, compilation scale for all navigational purposes and method of using SCAMIN attributes for archipelagic seas are proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altamura, F. (2003). Mediterranean North Adriatic Pilot Project. Proceedings of the 2nd International ECDIS Conference “ECDIS for Coastal and Ocean Navigation”, Singapore.Google Scholar
Bessero, G., Hecht, H. (1996). ECDIS: A European Perspective. The International Hydrographic Review, LXXIII(1), 1526.Google Scholar
Bisset, M., Fowle, R. (2003). IC-ENC – Improving ENC Consistency. 10th TSMAD meeting – TSMAD/10/8-1, http://www.iho.shom.frGoogle Scholar
Buljan, M., Zore-Armanda, M. (1976). Oceanographical properties of the Adriatic Sea. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 14, 1198.Google Scholar
Duplančić Leder, T. (2006). A New Approach to Electronic Navigational Charts Production in Croatia, PhD Dissertation, University of Zagreb – Faculty of Geodesy, 136. (in Croatian)Google Scholar
Duplančić Leder, T., Čala, M. (2003). ENC Production in Croatia. Geoinformation for Practice. Proceedings ISPRS 2003 WG VI/3, Zagreb, Croatia.Google Scholar
Duplančić Leder, T., Čala, M. (2004). Current status and role of North Adriatic VRENC project. Proceedings GIS Odyssey 2004, Zagreb, Croatia.Google Scholar
Duplančić Leder, T., Lapaine, M. (2005). Assigning S-57 SCAMIN Attributes for Archipelagic Seas: Eastern Adriatic Coast Expirience. The International Hydrographic Review, 6(1), 3343.Google Scholar
Duplančić Leder, T., Ujević, T., Čala, M. (2004). Coastline lengths and Areas of islands in the Croatian Part of the Adriatic Sea Determined from the Topographic Maps at the Scale of 1:25 000. Geoadria, 9/1, 532 or on line at http://www.unizd.hr/odjeli/geografija/GeoadriaGoogle Scholar
Duplančić Leder, T., Ujević, T., Čala, M., Viđak, I. (2000). Categorization and number of islands in the Republic of Croatia. Preiodicum Biologorum, 102(1), 281284.Google Scholar
Hardy, P. G. (2000). Multi-Scale Database Generalisation For Topographic Mapping, Hydrogra phy And Web-Mapping, Using Active Object Techniques. XXXIII ISPRS Proceedings, Amsterdam, Netherlands, or online at http://www.Laser-Scan.com/papers/isprs2000pgh_1436.pdfGoogle Scholar
ICA (1973). Multilingual dictionary of Technical Terms in Cartography. Franz Steiner Verlag, Weisbaden.Google Scholar
IHO (1953). Limits of Oceans and Seas. Special Publication No. 28, 3rd Edition, Monte Carlo.Google Scholar
IHO (2000). IHO Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data. 3.1 Edition, IHB, Monaco.Google Scholar
IHO (2004a). Improving ENC Consistency. CL 47/2004, IHB File No.S3/8151/CHRIS.Google Scholar
IHO (2004b). Electronic Navigational Chart (ENCs) “Production Cookbook” – A guide to the requirments and processing necessary to the produce ENCs, IHB File No.S3/8152/WEND.Google Scholar
IMO (1995): Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS), IMO Resolution A 19/Res.817, 23 November 1995, International Maritime Organization, or on line at http://www.imo.org/SafetyGoogle Scholar
Leder, N. (2004). Adriatic Sea Pilot. Hydrographic Institute of the Republic of Croatia.Google Scholar
Leder, N. (2005). Designation of the Adriatic Sea as a Particularly Sensitive Sea Area, First meeting of the PSSA project group, Oslo.Google Scholar
Lüthöft, M. H., Nyce, J. M. (2006). Piloting By Heart And By Chart. The Journal of Navigation, 59, 221237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlić, M., Gačić, M., La Violette, P. E. (1992). The currents and circulation of the Adriatic Sea. Oceanologica Acta, 15, 109124.Google Scholar
Polli, S. (1960). La propagazione delle maree nell'Adriatico. Atti del IX Convegno dell' Assosiazione Geofisica Italiana, Roma, 111.Google Scholar
Primar (2006). 6th Primar and IC-ENC TEWG Meeting, Stavanger.Google Scholar
Ulrich, C., Rottmann, E., Büttgenbach, G. B. (2003). SCAMIN – The Tool to control Online Generalization, http://www.openecdis.org/discussion/scamin/scamin.HtmlGoogle Scholar
UN (1995). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. London, UK. or on line at http://www.un.org/Google Scholar
Vachon, D. (2003). Canadian Implementation of SCAMIN Attribute for ENC. Online at http://www.openecdis.org/Google Scholar