Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:45:28.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mathematical Studies on Separation Standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

D. E. Lloyd
Affiliation:
(Royal Aircraft Establishment)

Extract

In a procedural Air Traffic Control environment, navigation standards are related to separation standards because of the way they both affect the collision risk. The Air Traffic Studies division of the Mathematics Department at R.A.E. has developed methods of estimating the collision risk procedural systems and these provide rational grounds for decisions on separation standards. In a radar-monitored system navigation accuracy and separation standards both affect the workload of the controller on the ground and it is necessary to study these effects to ensure that he is not overloaded. In addition the problems of estimating the collision risk will become more complicated. I shall very briefly describe the mathematical theory of collision risk for parallel tracks. A fuller description has been published in the Journal.

Type
Air Traffic Control Separation Standards and Navigation
Copyright
Copyright © Crown Copyright 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards— I. This Journal, 19, 88.Google Scholar
2Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards— II. This Journal, 19, 169.Google Scholar
3Reich, P. G. (1966). Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards— III. This Journal, 19, 331.Google Scholar
4Lloyd, D. E. (1967). Studies of procedures and spacings of twin-track feeder routes for the London Terminal Area.I.A.T.A. 17th technical conference,Lucerne, Oct. 9–14, 1967. Working paper 71.Google Scholar