Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:38:17.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Manœuvring Large Ships in Shallow Water—I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Extract

Dr. J. P. Hooft who is a Vice-President of the Netherlands Ship Model Basin at Wageningen, discusses the hydrodynamic forces which act upon a large ship sailing in shallow water. Their effects on the manœuvrability and control of the ship include a smaller response to a given rudder angle, a shift of the pivoting point aft towards the centre of gravity, a larger turning circle and less reduction in speed when turning. In general a ship becomes more sluggish in shallow water.

Since manœuvres with large ships are usually only performed in the proximity of harbours while in deep water the ship is kept on course by means of an autopilot, it will be difficult to compare the manœuvrability of large ships in shallow water with their manœuvrability in deep water. The influence of water depth on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the ship will therefore be the main subject of the present paper; the consequences of these ship characteristics on manœuvrability will then be considered. This term ‘manœuvrability’ is often replaced by ‘controllability’. In this respect a ship is said to be controllable when the navigator is able to manœuvre the ship with ease in such a way that departures from the anticipated manœuvre remain within acceptable limits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Strandhagen, A. G. (1972). ‘On the controllability of non-linear ships‘. Third Ship Control Systems Symposium, Ministry of Defence Ship Department, Bath.Google Scholar
2Mandel, P. (1967). ‘Ship manœuvring and control’. Chapter VIII of Principles of Naval Architecture, S.N.A.M.E., New York.Google Scholar
3Eda, H. (1971). ‘Directional stability and control of ships in restricted channels’. Trans. S.N.A.M.E.Google Scholar
4Berlekom, W. B. van and Goddard, T. A. (1972). ‘Manœuvring of large tankers’. Trans. S.N.A.M.E.Google Scholar
5Hooft, J. P. and Oosterveld, M. W. C. (1970). The manœuvrability of ships at low speed. Report No. 138S of Netherlands Ship Research Centre, Delft.Google Scholar
6Hoerner, S. F. (1965). Fluid-dynamic drag, published by the author.Google Scholar
7Lamb, H.Hydrodynamics. Dover Publications, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Naumann, A. ‘Messung eines Profiles in Anstellwinkelbereich 0° bis 360°’. Mitteilung des Aerodynamischen Institute der Technischen Hochschule, Aachen.Google Scholar
9Design Manual, Harbor and Coastal Facilities Navdocks DM—26, Department of the Navy, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
10Brard, R. (1951). ‘Manœuvring of ships in deep water, in shallow water and in canals‘. Trans. S.N.A.M.E.Google Scholar
11Eda, H. and Crane, C. L. (1965). ‘Steering characteristics of ships in calm water and waves’. Trans. S.N.A.M.E.Google Scholar
12Motora, S. and Couch, R. B. (1961). Manœuvrability of full bodied ships in restricted waters'. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
13Tryde, P. and Joshi, A. V. (1969). ‘Dragon ships from transverse currents in shallow water’. Paper S II–3 presented at the XXII International Navigation Congress, Paris.Google Scholar
14Hawkins, S., Taggert, R. and Hoyt, E. D. (1965). ‘The use of manœuvring propulsion devices on merchant ships. Office of Research and Development of U.S. Mar. Adm. Washington.Google Scholar
15Koseiki, N., Yamanouchi, Y., Matsuoka, S. and Yamazaki, Y. (1969). Some model experiments on shallow water effects upon turning ability. Journal of the Soc. of Nav. Arch, of Japan, 3, Tokyo.Google Scholar
16Shiba, H. (1960). Model experiments about the manoeuvrability and turning of ships. D.T.M.B. report 1461, Washington.Google Scholar
17Nomoto, K. (1960). Analysis of Kempf's standard manoeuvre test and proposed steering quality indices. D.T.M.B. report 1461, Washington.Google Scholar
18Oosterveld, M. W. C. and Hooft, J. P. (1971). ‘Hydrodynamics of the restricted draught tanker’, Symposium on the development of a 425,000 T.D.W. tanker with restricted draught. Organized by N.S.M.B. Wageningen.Google Scholar