Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:42:43.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implementation and Analysis of Tightly Integrated INS/Stereo VO for Land Vehicle Navigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2017

Fei Liu ,
Yashar Balazadegan Sarvrood  and
Yang Gao
Fei Liu*
Affiliation:
(University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
Yashar Balazadegan Sarvrood
Affiliation:
(University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
Yang Gao
Affiliation:
(University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tight integration of inertial sensors and stereo visual odometry to bridge Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signal outages in challenging environments has drawn increasing attention. However, the details of how feature pixel coordinates from visual odometry can be directly used to limit the quick drift of inertial sensors in a tight integration implementation have rarely been provided in previous works. For instance, a key challenge in tight integration of inertial and stereo visual datasets is how to correct inertial sensor errors using the pixel measurements from visual odometry, however this has not been clearly demonstrated in existing literature. As a result, this would also affect the proper implementation of the integration algorithms and their performance assessment. This work develops and implements the tight integration of an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) and stereo cameras in a local-level frame. The results of the integrated solutions are also provided and analysed. Land vehicle testing results show that not only the position accuracy is improved, but also better azimuth and velocity estimation can be achieved, when compared to stand-alone INS or stereo visual odometry solutions.

Keywords

Stereo VOInertial Navigation SystemExtended Kalman filterTight integration
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 83 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Asadi, E. and Bottasso, C.L. (2014). Tightly-coupled stereo vision-aided inertial navigation using feature-based motion sensors. Advanced Robotics, 28(11), 717–729.Google Scholar
Bottasso, C.L., Leonello, D. and Milano, P. (2008). Vision-augmented inertial navigation by sensor fusion for an autonomous rotorcraft vehicle. In AHS International Specialists' Meeting on Unmanned Rotorcraft, 1028–1033.Google Scholar
Carrillo, L.R.G., López, A.E.D., Lozano, R. and Pégard, C. (2012). Combining stereo vision and inertial navigation system for a quad-rotor UAV. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 65(1–4), 373–387.Google Scholar
Geiger, A., Ziegler, J. and Stiller, C. (2011). Stereoscan: Dense 3d reconstruction in real-time. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, pp. 963–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, M.S., Weill, L.R. and Andrews, A.P. (2007). Global positioning systems, inertial navigation, and integration, John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. (2003). Multiple view geometry in computer vision, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jekeli, C. (2001). Inertial navigation systems with geodetic applications, Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneip, L., Scaramuzza, D. and Siegwart, R. (2011). A novel parametrization of the perspective-three-point problem for a direct computation of absolute camera position and orientation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2969–2976.Google Scholar
Kong, X., Wu, W., Zhang, L. and Wang, Y. (2015). Tightly-Coupled Stereo Visual-Inertial Navigation Using Point and Line Features. Sensors, 15(6), 12816–12833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konolige, K., Agrawal, M. and Sola, J. (2010). Large-scale visual odometry for rough terrain. In Robotics research. Springer, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepetit, V., Moreno-Noguer, F. and Fua, P. (2009). Epnp: An accurate o (n) solution to the pnp problem. International journal of computer vision, 81(2), 155–166.Google Scholar
Liu, F., Sarvrood, Y.B. and Gao, Y. (2015). Tightly Coupled Stereo Vision Aided Inertial Navigation Using Continuously Tracked Features for Land Vehicles. In the 28th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS + 2015). Tampa, 2127–2133.Google Scholar
Lowe, D.G. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision, 60(2), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nistér, D. (2004). An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 26(6), 756–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nistér, D., Naroditsky, O. and Bergen, J. (2004). Visual odometry. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on. IEEE, I-652.Google Scholar
Noureldin, A., Karamat, T.B. and Georgy, J. (2012). Fundamentals of inertial navigation, satellite-based positioning and their integration, Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Pankaj, D.S. and Nidamanuri, R.R. (2016). A Robust Estimation Technique for 3D Point Cloud Registration. Image Analysis & Stereology, 35(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarvrood, Y.B. and Gao, Y., 2014. Analysis and Reduction of Stereo Vision Alignment and Velocity Errors for Vision Navigation. In ION GNSS 2014. IEEE.Google Scholar
Scaramuzza, D. and Fraundorfer, F. (2011). Visual odometry Tutorial. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, 18(4), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soloviev, A. and Miller, M.M. (2012). Navigation in difficult environments: multi-sensor fusion techniques. In Sensors: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer, 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strelow, D. (2004). Motion Estimation from Image and Inertial Measurements. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 23(12), 1157–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, J.-P., George, M., Laverne, M., Kelly, A. and Stentz, A. (2010). A new approach to vision-aided inertial navigation. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. IEEE, 4161–4168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasi, C. and Kanade, T. (1991). Detection and tracking of point features, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ. Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Usenko, V., Engel, J., Stückler, J. and Cremers, D. (2016). Direct Visual-Inertial Odometry with Stereo Cameras. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 1885–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veth, M. and Raquet, J. (2007). Two-dimensional stochastic projections for tight integration of optical and inertial sensors for navigation, DTIC Document.Google Scholar
Xian, Z., Hu, X. and Lian, J. (2015). Fusing Stereo Camera and Low-Cost Inertial Measurement Unit for Autonomous Navigation in a Tightly-Coupled Approach. Journal of Navigation, 68(3), 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar