Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:57:20.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Collision and the Perspectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Captain W. Burger and Captain A. G. Corbet in their general comment on the meeting of the Technical Committee in London, 16 April 1969, gave a curious and instructive hypothetical example of end-on encounter, a problem in navigation which they and others have found by experiments to have importance and practical difficulties. Their example is set in surface navigation at sea, and especially when using radar in fog. Two ships close with each other (in their example head-on and green-to-green), the two tracks being straight and parallel, and separated (in their example by half a mile). Should both ships stand on? My answer is affirmative, my argument difficult.

If one makes the fruitful assumption that neither ship in this example alters course or speed, and then tries to plot The Edge [ of regression of The (mutual) Line (of bearing)], he discovers that the result is not a non-singular parabola, but rather simply a fixed finite point, i.e. at best a degenerate parabola—yet clearly there can be no finite collision, and collision at infinity is an empty threat. What do plotters of The Edge make of this paradox? Here handbook summaries will not do.

Type
Forum
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1970

References

REFERENCES

1Burger, W. and Corbet, A. G. (1969). General Comment in The Revision of the Collision Regulations. This Journal, 22, 306.Google Scholar
2Bell, F. C. (1969). The Edge of a Needless Collision (Forum). This Journal, 22, 513.Google Scholar
3ProfessorHenrici, Olaus Magnus Friedrich Ph.D., LL.D., F.R.S. (1910). Geometry II. Projective Geometry, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, Vol. 11, 694, 699, 707.Google Scholar