No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 January 2010
Summary of a paper presented at a meeting of the Auschuss für Funkortung at Essen on 28 February 1956.
In any investigation of the accuracy of Decca fixes it is necessary to distinguish between systematic and random errors. Investigations are generally based on a comparison between a Decca fix and a fix obtained by some other method; because of the high accuracy of Decca the other method must in practice be a terrestrial fix. The investigation can be made by comparing the decometer readings with values calculated for the true position; or the Decca position may be compared directly with the true position. The first way gives the differences of the Decca observations in terms of percentages of a lane, and the second shows immediately the errors of the Decca fix. The second method includes the uncertainty caused by the siting of the Decca stations, that is by the angle of intersection of the Decca hyperbolae. The second method will be of more direct use to practical navigators while on the first will be based considerations of a theoretical and strictly technical nature.