Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:11:26.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Compact Network RTK Method: An Effective Solution to Reduce GNSS Temporal and Spatial Decorrelation Error

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2010

Byungwoon Park  and
Changdon Kee
Byungwoon Park
Affiliation:
(Seoul National University)
Changdon Kee*
Affiliation:
(Seoul National University)
*
(E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes a method that combines compact real-time kinematic (RTK) and reference station (RS) networking techniques, and shows that this approach can reduce both the temporal and spatial decorrelation error. The compact RTK method compatibility with all the conventional network RTK systems, i.e., Master-Auxiliary Concept (MAC), Virtual Reference Stations (VRS), and Flächen-Korrektur Parameter (FKP), is examined theoretically in this paper. To prove that the compact RTK approach is not only valid, but also helpful to the network RTK system, a field test was held using one hour of Receiver Independent Exchange Format (RINEX) data logged every second from Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS). No matter which network RTK method is applied, the Compact Network RTK approach resolves the ambiguity of the carrier phase in 10–40 s and determines position with 6–7 cm horizontal and 7–8 cm vertical error (95%) in a 100 by 100 km region. Moreover, the Compact Network RTK approach enables network RTK service providers to reduce the data-link bandwidth for correction messages to 5–700 bps (bit/s) down from several thousand bps, currently 9600 bps of GPRS/GSM, without a severe degradation of accuracy.

Keywords

Compact RTKNetwork RTKTime delayDistance-dependent error
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 343 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

RTCM (2001), Recommended Standards for Differential GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) Services – Version 2.3, RTCM Standard 10402.3.Google Scholar
RTCM (2006), Recommended Standards for Differential GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) Service, Version 3.1, RTCM Standard 10403.1.Google Scholar
TRIMBLE TERRASAT GMBH White Paper (2005). “Support of network formats by Trimble GPSNet network RTK solution.”Google Scholar
Dai, L., Han, S., Wang, J., and Rizos, C. (2001). “A study of GPS/GLONASS multiple reference station techniques for precise real-time carrier phase-based positioning.” 14th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Division of the United States ION, Salt Lake City, Utah, 392–403.Google Scholar
Dorota, A. G. et al. , (2007). Efficiency and reliability of ambiguity resolution in network-based real-time kinematic GPS, Journal of Surveying. Engineering 133(2): 56–65.Google Scholar
Euler, H. J., et al. (2001). “Study of a simplified approach in utilizing information from permanent reference station arrays.” Proceedings of the ION GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, UT, 379–391.Google Scholar
Gianniou, M. (2008). “HEPOS: Modern network-based GPS surveying.” GIS/GPS, 2008, 4–7.Google Scholar
Kee, C., and Kim, J. (2002). “Efficient transmission technique of compact RTK correction messages for low-rate RTK data-link, Proceedings of the ION GPS-2002, Portland Oregon, 1361–1371.Google Scholar
Kee, C., et al. (2004). “Test results of RTK-GPS using low-rate datalink.” Proceedings of the ION 2004 National Technical Meetings, San Diego CA, 462–468.Google Scholar
Kim, J., and Kee, C. (2002). “A proposal of new correction data format for real-time kinematic positioning.” Proceedings of the ION-2002 National Technical Meetings, San Diego CA, 854–862.Google Scholar
Kim, J., and Kee, C. (2004). “RTK-GPS correction generation technique for low-rate data-link.” The Journal of Navigation, 57, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., et al. (2004). “Budget analysis and realization of precise RTK-GPS via compact correction messages applied to commercial GPS receivers.” Proceedings of the ION GNSS-2004, 1460–1467.Google Scholar
Park, B., et al. (2006). “RRC unnecessary for DGPS messages.” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42(3), 1149–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, B. (2008). “A study on reducing temporal and spatial decorrelation effect in GNSS augmentation system: considering of the correction message standardization.” Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National Univ., Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
Rizos, C., and Han, S. (2003). Reference station network based RTK. systems–concepts & progress.” Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on GPS/GNSS (CD-ROM), Wuhan, P. R. China.Google Scholar
Takac, F. (2008). “The relationship between network RTK solutions MAC, VRS, PRS, FKP and i-MAX.” Proceedings of the ION GNSS 2008, 16–19 September 2008, Savannah, GA., 348–355.Google Scholar
Wübbena, G., et al. (2001). “RTK networks based on Geo++® GNSMART−concepts, implementation, results.” Proceedings of the ION GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, UT, 369–378.Google Scholar