Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:14:34.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alternative Strategies for Traffic Flow-Management in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Abstract

This paper attempts to challenge some of the principles on which en-route airspace is presently allocated, whilst pointing out the practical difficulties of implementing any alternative strategy. The paper does not discuss airport capacity limitations and terminal area problems, although these also contribute to restrictions on traffic flow.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Graham, W. and Orr, R. H.(1970). Separation of aircraft by visual means. Proc. IEEE, 58, 3.Google Scholar
2 Anon. (1988). A mathematical version of the draft SARPS for ACAS 2 ICAO SICASP/WG2 WP2.Google Scholar
3Ratcliffe, S.(1989). Automatic conflict detection logic for future ATC. This Journal, 42, 92.Google Scholar
4Ford, R. L.(1980). ATC and the traffic situation display. This Journal, 33, 64.Google Scholar
5 Anon. (1988). Report of 4th Meeting, Special Committee on Future Air Navigation Systems. ICAO, Montreal.Google Scholar
6Hunt, V. R. and Zellweger, A.(1987). Strategies for future air traffic control systems. Computer, 20, 2.Google Scholar
7Wesson, R.et al. (1981). Scenarios for evolution of air traffic control. R-2698-FAA. Nov. 1981. Rand Corpn. Santa Monica CA.Google Scholar
8 Anon. (1988). Air traffic management in the United Kingdom. CAP 540 July 1988. Civil Aviation Authority, London.Google Scholar