Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:23:23.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilateral donors and aid conditionality in post-conflict peacebuilding: the case of Mozambique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2010

Carrie Manning  and
Monica Malbrough
Carrie Manning*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Georgia State University, 38 Peachtree Center Ave, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Monica Malbrough*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Georgia State University, 38 Peachtree Center Ave, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the role of bilateral donors and conditional aid in Mozambique's successful post-war peace process. The literature on peacebuilding has tended to privilege the role of UN missions in explaining the outcomes of post-civil war peace processes. The important role that bilateral donors may play in determining these outcomes has not been thoroughly studied. In Mozambique, donors with country experience, knowledge of domestic political actors and constraints, and a shared commitment to a successful outcome, were indispensable to the success of the peace process. The article details this engagement, arguing that it was not UNOMOZ alone, but UNOMOZ as supported by the flexible responses of these donors, that provided an effective third-party guarantee of the peace agreement in Mozambique. It briefly discusses the broader implications of this finding for understanding international peacebuilding efforts.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 143 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, H. 1995. The Washington Consensus and Mozambique. Gothenburg/Maputo: Padrigu/CEEI-ISRI.Google Scholar
Ajello, A. 1999. ‘Mozambique: implementation of the 1992 Peace Agreement’, in Crocker, et al. , eds. Herding Cats, 615–42.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. 1999. Do No Harm: how aid can support peace – or war. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstee, M. J. 1999. ‘The United Nations in Angola: post-Bicesse implementation’, in Crocker, et al. , eds. Herding Cats, 587–614.Google Scholar
Ball, N. & Barnes, S.. 2000. ‘Mozambique’, in Forman, & Patrick, , eds. Good Intentions, 159–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartoli, A. 1999. ‘Mediating peace in Mozambique: the role of the community of Sant'Egidio’, in Crocker, et al. , eds. Herding Cats, 245–74.Google Scholar
Boyce, J. K. 2000. ‘Beyond good intentions: external assistance and peace building’, in Forman, & Patrick, , eds. Good Intentions, 367–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, J. K. 2002. ‘Aid conditionality as a tool for peacebuilding: opportunities and constraints’, Development and Change 33, 5: 1025–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S. & Venancio, M., eds. 1998. War and Peace in Mozambique. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesterman, S. 2005. You the People: the United Nations, transitional administration and statebuilding. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, K. M. 1996. ‘Mozambique's transition from war to peace: USAID's lessons learned’, unpublished paper, Africa Bureau Information Center Research and Referral Services, Washington, DC: USAID, available at: http://pdf.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNABY278.pdf, accessed 22.9.2009.Google Scholar
Cortright, D., ed. 1997. The Price of Peace: incentives and international conflict prevention. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crocker, C., Hampson, F. O. & Aall, P., eds. 1999. Herding Cats: multiparty mediation in a complex world. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Crocker, C., Hampson, F. O. & Aall, P., eds. 2001. Turbulent Peace: the challenges of managing international conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
de Mul, E. 1995. ‘O papel do PNUD na coordenação do apoio internacional à Comissão Nacional de Eleições’, in Mazula, B., ed. Moçambique: eleições, democracia e desenvolvimento. Maputo: InterAfrica, 637–41.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. & Sambanis, N.. 2006. Making War and Building Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). 1990. Mozambique Country Report, no. 2. London: EIU.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). 1993. ‘Interim report and recommendations to the EPS Africa Working Group from Heads of Mission in Maputo concerning support to the electoral process in Mozambique’, Maputo, March 1993, mimeo.Google Scholar
Forman, S. & Patrick, S., eds. 2000. Good Intentions: pledges of aid for postconflict recovery. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortna, P. 2004. Peace Time: cease-fire agreements and the durability of peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frerks, G. 2006. The Use of Peace Conditionality in Conflict and Post-Conflict Settings: a conceptual framework and a checklist. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.Google Scholar
Goodhand, J. 2001. Aid, Conflict and Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka: conflict assessments 2. London: Centre for Defence Studies, King's College.Google Scholar
Goodhand, J. & Sedra, M.. 2006. ‘Bargains for peace? Aid, conditionalities and reconstruction in Afghanistan’, The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Group for Democracy Aid (GAD). 1993. ‘September 1993 Memorandum to Mozambican Political Parties’, Maputo, mimeo.Google Scholar
Hall, M. 1990. ‘The Mozambican National Resistance Movement (RENAMO): a study in the deconstruction of an African country’, Africa 60, 1: 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. & Young, T.. 1997. Confronting Leviathan: Mozambique since independence. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Hanlon, J. 2008. Do Bicycles Equal Development in Mozambique? Oxford: James Currey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, L. M. 2008. UN Peacekeeping in Civil Wars. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jett, D. C. 1999. Why Peacekeeping Fails. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killick, T. 1997. ‘Principals, agents and the failings of conditionality’, Journal of International Development 9, 4: 483–95.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. 1997. ‘Democratization in Mozambique: beginning at the end?’, unpublished dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Political Science.Google Scholar
Manning, C. 2002. The Politics of Peace in Mozambique: post-conflict democratization, 1992–2000. Westport, CT: Praeger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. 2006. ‘Political elites and democratic state-building efforts in Bosnia and Iraq’, Democratization 13, 5: 724–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. M. 1992. ‘Beyond conditionality’, Harvard International Review 15, 1: 4–8.Google Scholar
Paris, R. 2004. At War's End: building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman, S. J., Rothchild, D. & Cousens, E.. 2002. Ending Civil Wars: the implementation of peace agreements. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokke, O. 1995. ‘Aid and political conditionality: core issues and the state of the art’, in Stokke, O., ed. Aid and Political Conditionality. London: Frank Cass, 1–87.Google Scholar
Suhrke, A. & Buckmaster, J.. 2005. ‘Aid, growth and peace: a comparative analysis’, CMI Working Paper 2005: 13, Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute, available at: http://www.cmi.no/publications/file/?2053=aid-growth-and-peace-a-comparative-analysisGoogle Scholar
Svensson, J. 2000. ‘When is foreign aid policy credible? Aid dependence and conditionality’, Journal of Development Economics 61, 1: 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiss Development Corporation (SDC). 1994. ‘Reintegration of demobilized soldiers: business and skills development project’, Maputo, mimeo.Google Scholar
Turner, M. 1995. ‘A comunidade internacional e o process eleitoral em Moçambique’, in Mazula, B., ed. Moçambique: eleições, democracia e desenvolvimento. Maputo: InterAfrica Group, 643–72.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1995. ‘Assistance to the electoral process in Mozambique: final report’, Maputo: UNDP.Google Scholar
Vines, A. 1991. Renamo: terrorism in Mozambique. University of York: Centre for Southern African Studies.Google Scholar
Walter, B. 1997. ‘The critical barrier to civil war settlements’, International Organization 51, 3: 335–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar