Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:04:31.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychoses Associated with Childbirth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

D. N. Parfitt
D. N. Parfitt*
Affiliation:
Warwick County Mental Hospital, Hatton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pregnancy, with the associated pain and danger of labour and the Puerperium, is an ordeal for any woman, more so perhaps to-day than it has ever been, because of the wide publicity given to the toll of puerperal infection and the need for ante-natal care. An experience so intimately connected with the love-life, and with social and economic difficulties also, is often a period of acute mental stress in perfectly healthy women. Still more is it a time of psychological tension in those constitutionally unstable and liable to mental breakdown, both because they are not able to withstand the strain of mental conflict, and because they are the more likely to meet with such emotional problems on account of their temperamental unbalance.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 80 , Issue 328 , January 1934 , pp. 43 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1934

Footnotes

∗

An Essay for which the Bronze Medal of the Royal Medico-Psychological Association was awarded, 1933.

References

1Baird, D., Lancet, 1932, ii, p. 984.Google Scholar
2Casson, W. J., Journ. of Urol., 1927, xviii, p. 61.Google Scholar
3Stoeckel, W., Doederlein's, Handbuch d. Geburtshilfe, 1925, p. 111.Google Scholar
4Anselmino, , Hoffman, and Kennedy, , Edin. Med. Journ., 1932, xxxix, p. 367.Google Scholar
5Küstner, H., Klin. Woch., June iith, 1932, p. 1016;.10.1007/BF01758099Google Scholar
6Beaumont, G. E., and Dodds, E. C., Recent Advances in Medicine, London, 4th edition.Google Scholar
7McCowan, P. K., and Quastel, J. H., Lancet, 1931, ii, p. 731.10.1016/S0140-6736(00)81592-5Google Scholar
8Gainsborough, H., Clinical Interpretation of Aids to Diagnosis, Vol. ii, p. 175.Google Scholar
9Stenberg, Sven, Acta Med. Scandinavica, reprint from Vol. lxxi.Google Scholar
10Lockwood, M. R., Journ. Ment. Sci., October, 1932, p. 901.10.1192/bjp.78.323.901Google Scholar
11Graves, T. C., and Pickworth, F. A., ibid., July, 1932.Google Scholar
12Miller, A. R., New York State Journ. of Med., July 1, 1932, p. 796.Google Scholar
13Mellanby, E., Green, H. N., Pinder, D., and Davis, C., Brit. Med. Journ., 1931, ii, p. 595.Google Scholar
14Mellanby, E., and Green, H. N., ibid.Google Scholar
15Whitby, L. E. H., Journ. Obstet, and Gynacol. of the Brit. Emp., Summer No., 1932, p. 267.Google Scholar
16Cole, R. H., Mental Diseases, London, 3rd edition, 1924.Google Scholar
17Anderson, E. W., Journ. Ment. Sci., January, 1933, p. 137.10.1192/bjp.79.324.137Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.