Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T19:40:17.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

One Hundred Depressive Psychoses Treated with Electrically Induced Convulsions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. C. Batt
J. C. Batt*
Affiliation:
St. Ebba's Hospital, Epsom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the introduction of the electrically induced convulsion by Cerletti and Bini the history of this procedure has become too well known to record again; but certain clinical data have come to light that are worth noting, of which the most important is the now recognized fact that this treatment is of more value in the affective psychoses than in schizophrenia, for which it was early introduced. Most writers, e.g., Elfield, Metcalfe and Paul, are agreed upon this, and it would therefore seem worth while to examine the results of this therapy in one hundred such cases. Depressions are so much commoner than manias that it would take a long time to collect a sufficient number of the latter for reliable conclusions to be drawn. These remarks are thus confined to the depressive states.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 89 , Issue 375 , April 1943 , pp. 289 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1943 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpers, B. J., and Hughes, J. (1942), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 47, 285–298.Google Scholar
Bellet, S., Kerschbaum, A., and Furst, W. (1941), Amer. J, med. Sci., 201, 167–177.Google Scholar
Cerletti, U., and Bini, L. (1939), Zbl. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 93, 691.Google Scholar
Cleckley, H. M., Hamilton, W. P., Woodbury, R. A., and Volpitto, P. P. (1942), Sth. med. J. 36, 375–381.Google Scholar
Elfield, P. F. (1941), Delaware St. med. J., 13, 95–107.Google Scholar
Fetterman, J. L. (1941), Ohio St. med. J., 37, 855.Google Scholar
Flescher, J. (1942), J. nerv. ment. Dis., 96, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonda, V. E. (1941), Dis. nerv. Syst., 2, 84–92.Google Scholar
Grinker, .—Quoted by Fetterman.Google Scholar
Hauser, A., and Barbato, L. (1941), Tex. St. J. med., 37, 228–233.Google Scholar
Hemphill, R. E., and Walter, W. G. (1941), J. ment. Sci., 87, 256–275.Google Scholar
Impastato, D. J., and Almansi, R. (1941), Med. Ann. D.C., 10, 163–170.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, G. E. (1941), J. Indian med. Ass., 34, 455–458.Google Scholar
Milch, E. C. (1941), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 46, 848–850.Google Scholar
Myerson, A. (1941), New Eng. J. med., 224, 1081–1085.Google Scholar
Neubuerger, K. T., Whitehead, R. W., Rutledge, E. K., and Ebaugh, F. G. (1942), Amer. J. med. Sci., 204, 381–387.Google Scholar
Paul, F. (1942), Delaware St. med. J., 14, 86–88.Google Scholar
Sogliani, G. (1940), Zbl. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 95, 407.Google Scholar
Wender, L., and Jezer, A. (1941), Psychiat. Quart., 15, 4, 680–692.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.