Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:51:10.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential Cerebral Electrostimulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. D. Montagu*
Affiliation:
Runwell Hospital, Wickford, Essex

Extract

Cerebral electrostimulation of subconvulsive intensity causes a pronounced increase in the concentration of adrenaline-like substances in the blood (Weil-Malherbe and Bone, 1952b). This effect is presumed to be due to a central action of the current, since these investigators were unable to demonstrate any rise when both electrodes were placed on the same side of the head. The current which was used in these experiments consisted of brief rectangular impulses with a repetition rate of 100 pulses per second (Montagu, 1953). Recently, while experimenting with shorter pulses at correspondingly higher repetition rates, the author observed that the motor response diminished as the frequency was raised, the peak and average current levels remaining constant. This effect, which appeared to be due to the progressive abbreviation of the pulses to the point at which they ceased to be effective motor stimuli, suggested that these conditions might be advantageous in electrostimulation therapy, provided that the autonomic effects were not equally impaired. Firstly, however, it was necessary to determine whether the diminution in the motor effects at the higher frequencies was part of a generalized reduction in the efficiency of cerebral stimulation or whether there was a differential response. Accordingly, with the assistance of Dr. Weil-Malherbe, the blood adrenaline level has been studied in relation to the different conditions of stimulation. The results of this investigation are contained in the present report.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1955 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, L., Amer. J. Psychiat, 1950, 107, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Treatment of Mental Disorder, 1953. Philadelphia and London: Saunders.Google Scholar
Berkwitz, N. J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1940, 44, 760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Dis. nerv. Syst., 1952, 13, 323.Google Scholar
Best, C. H., and Taylor, N. M., The Physiological Basis of Medical Practice, 1950, p. 905. 5th ed. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cox.Google Scholar
Cossa, P., Martin, P., and Lombard, A., Ann. méd.-psychol., 1948, 106, i, 612.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, G. R., Psychiat. Quart. Suppl., 1950, 24, 297.Google Scholar
Idem and Bell, J., Dis. nerv. Syst., 1951, 12, 264.Google Scholar
Leduc, S., Arch. Elect. med., 1903, 11, 521.Google Scholar
Liberson, W. T., Yale J. Biol. Med., 1945, 17, 571.Google Scholar
Montagu, J. D., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riboli, B., and Mancini, E., Note Psichiat., Pesaro, 1948, 74, 175.Google Scholar
Robie, T. R., J. med. Soc. N. J., 1950, 47, 370.Google Scholar
Weil-Malherbe, H., 1954. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Idem and Bone, A. D., Biochem. J., 1952a, 51, 311.Google Scholar
Iidem , J. ment. Sci., 1952b, 98, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem , Lancet, 1953, i, 974.Google Scholar
Wyss, O. A. M., and Obrador, A., Amer. J. Physiol., 1937, 120, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.