Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:11:18.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drop-weight impact test on an integrated composite sandwich panel of aluminum honeycomb and epoxy resin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2017

Shuliang Cheng ,
Bo Xiao ,
Xuya Zhao ,
Yajun Xin  and
Huijian Li
Shuliang Cheng
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Bo Xiao
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Xuya Zhao
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Yajun Xin*
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
Huijian Li
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, drop-weight impact test was carried out on an integrated composite sandwich panel of aluminum honeycomb and epoxy resin to investigate its failure modes and typical force–displacement curves, and the influences of different parameters on plateau phase duration time, nominal stress, and energy absorption capacity were analyzed. Dynamic impact test results indicated that this integrated composite sandwich panel had good integrality, stability, and energy absorption capacity. The force–displacement curves of flat-bottom impactor and gradual impactor respectively had seven and five phases. Impact velocity, impactor shape, and specimen thickness had significant influences on the plateau phase duration time, nominal stress, and energy absorption capacity of the composite panel. It can be found from our results that the mechanical properties of the integrated composite sandwich panel were superior to those of traditional sandwich panels.

Keywords

composite structuresandwich panelhoneycombdrop-weight test
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 12 , 28 June 2017 , pp. 2258 - 2265
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Hu, L., You, F., and Yu, T.: Effect of cell-wall angle on the in-plane crushing behavior of hexagonal honeycombs. Mater. Des. 46, 511–523 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahaya, M.A., Ruan, D., Lu, G., and Dargusch, M.S.: Response of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to foam projectile impact—An experimental study. Int. J. Impact Eng. 75, 100–109 (2015).Google Scholar
Ashab, A., Ruan, D., Lu, G., Xu, S., and Wen, C.: Experimental investigation of the mechanical behavior of aluminum honeycombs under quasi-static and dynamic indentation. Mater. Des. 74, 138–149 (2015).Google Scholar
Ashaby, A., Wong, Y.C., Lu, G., and Ruan, D.: Indentation tests of aluminium honeycombs. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 451, 1–11 (2013).Google Scholar
Shi, S., Sun, Z., Hu, X., and Chen, H.: Flexural strength and energy absorption of carbon-fiber-aluminum-honeycomb composite sandwich reinforced by aluminum grid. Thin Wall. Struct. 84, 416–422 (2014).Google Scholar
Abbadi, A., Tixier, C., Gilgert, J., and Azari, Z.: Experimental study on the fatigue behavior of honeycomb sandwich panels with artificial defects. Compos. Struct. 120, 394–405 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crupi, V., Epasto, G., and Guglielmino, E.: Collapse modes in aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. 43, 6–15 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanchang, Z. and Zili, W.: Study on crash worthiness of honeycomb sandwich panel under lateral dynamic load. J. Jiangsu Univ. Sci. Technol., Nat. Sci. Ed. 27, 1–5 (2007).Google Scholar
Ashab, A., Ruan, D., Lu, G., and Wong, Y.C.: Quasi-static and dynamic experiments of aluminum honeycombs under combined compression-shear loading. Mater. Des. 97, 183–194 (2016).Google Scholar
Yasui, Y.: Dynamic axial crushing of multi-layer honeycomb panels and impact tensile behavior of the component members. Int. J. Impact Eng. 24, 659–671 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ude, A.U., Ariffin, A.K., and Azhari, C.H.: Impact damage characteristics in reinforced woven natural silk/epoxy composite face-sheet and sandwich foam, coremat and honeycomb materials. Int. J. Impact Eng. 58, 31–38 (2013).Google Scholar
Hazizan, Md.A. and Cantwell, W.J.: The velocity impact response of an aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure. Composites, Part B 34, 679–687 (2003).Google Scholar
Hong, S-T., Pan, J., Tyan, T., and Prasad, P.: Dynamic crush behavior of aluminum honeycomb specimens under compression dominant inclined loads. Int. J. Plast. 24, 89–117 (2008).Google Scholar
Zhao, H., Elnasri, I., and Abdennadher, S.: An experiment study on the behavior under impact loading of metallic cellular materials. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 47, 757–774 (2005).Google Scholar
Li, X., Zhang, P., Wang, Z., Wu, G., and Zhao, L.: Dynamic behavior of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels under air blast: Experiment and numerical analysis. Compos. Struct. 108, 1001–1008 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, Y., Langdon, G.S., and Nurick, G.N.: The influence of core height and face plate thickness on the response of honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to blast loading. Mater. Des. 31, 1887–1899 (2010).Google Scholar
Lei, D., Anwen, W., Liuwei, M., and Kuibin, L.: Energy absorption characteristics of a square hole honeycomb sandwich plate under blast loading. J. Vib. Shock 31, 186–189 (2012).Google Scholar
Li, K., Gao, X.L., and Wang, J.: Dynamic crushing behavior of honeycomb structures with irregular cell shapes and non-uniform cell wall thickness. Int. J. Solids Struct. 44, 5003–5026 (2007).Google Scholar
Xie, S. and Zhou, H.: Impact characteristics of a composite energy absorbing bearing structure for railway vehicles. Composites, Part B 67, 455–463 (2014).Google Scholar
Hönig, A. and Stronge, W.J.: In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycomb Part I: Crush band initiation and wave trapping. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 44, 1665–1696 (2002).Google Scholar
Cheng, S.L., Zhao, X.Y., Xin, Y.J., Du, S.Y., and Li, H.J.: Quasi-static localized indentation tests on integrated sandwich panel of aluminum foam and epoxy resin. Compos. Struct. 129, 157–164 (2015).Google Scholar
Minxi, W. and Junmin, Z.: Introduction on composite sandwich panel fabrication. Applied Science and Technology 25, 50–57 (2004).Google Scholar
Min, Z. and Changjun, C.: Manufacturing technology of Al foam sandwich. Mater. Rev. 22, 85–89 (2008).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Cheng supplementary material

Cheng supplementary material 1

Download Cheng supplementary material(Image)
Image 133 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Cheng supplementary material

Cheng supplementary material 2

Download Cheng supplementary material(Image)
Image 112 KB

Cheng supplementary material

Cheng supplementary material 3

Download Cheng supplementary material(Audio)
Audio 293 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Cheng supplementary material

Cheng supplementary material 4

Download Cheng supplementary material(Image)
Image 84.8 KB