Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:49:33.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pressure-dependent flow behavior of Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jun Lu  and
Guruswami Ravichandran
Jun Lu
Affiliation:
Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
Guruswami Ravichandran*
Affiliation:
Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An experimental study of the inelastic deformation of bulk metallic glass Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 under multiaxial compression using a confining sleeve technique is presented. In contrast to the catastrophic shear failure (brittle) in uniaxial compression, the metallic glass exhibited large inelastic deformation of more than 10% under confinement, demonstrating the nature of ductile deformation under constrained conditions in spite of the long-range disordered characteristic of the material. It was found that the metallic glass followed a pressure (p) dependent Tresca criterion τ = τ0 + βp, and the coefficient of the pressure dependence β was 0.17. Multiple parallel shear bands oriented at 45° to the loading direction were observed on the surfaces of the deformed specimens and were responsible for the overall inelastic deformation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 18 , Issue 9 , September 2003 , pp. 2039 - 2049
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Klement, W.J., Willens, R.H., and Duwez, P., Nature 187, 869 (1960).Google Scholar
2.Chen, H.S. and Turnbull, D., Acta Metall. 17, 1021 (1969).Google Scholar
3.Pampillo, C.A., J. Mater. Sci. 10, 1194 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Masumoto, T. and Maddin, R., Mater. Sci. Eng. 19, 1 (1975).Google Scholar
5.Inoue, A., Bulk Amorphous Alloys: Preparation and Fundamental Characteristics (Trans Tech Publications, Uetikon-Zuerich, Switzerland, 1998).Google Scholar
6.Johnson, W.L., MRS Bull. 24, 42 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Peker, A. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2342 (1993).Google Scholar
8.Gilbert, C.J., Schroeder, V., and Ritchie, R.O., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 30A, 1739 (1999).Google Scholar
9.Wright, W.J., Saha, R., and Nix, W.D., Mater. Trans. JIM 42, 642 (2001).Google Scholar
10.Johnson, W.L., JOM 54, 40 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Lu, J., Ravichandran, G., and Johnson, W.L., Acta. Mater. (in press, 2003).Google Scholar
12.Bruck, H.A., Christman, T., Rosakis, A.J., and Johnson, W.L., Scripta Metall. 30, 429 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Davis, L.A. and Kavesh, S., J. Mater. Sci. 10, 453 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Donovan, P.E., Acta Metall. 37, 445 (1989).Google Scholar
15.Kimura, H. and Masumoto, T., Acta. Metall. 28, 1663 (1980).Google Scholar
16.Vaidyanathan, R., Dao, M., Ravichandran, G., and Suresh, S., Acta Mater. 49, 3781 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lowhaphandu, P. and Lewandowski, J.J., Scripta Metall Mater. 38, 1811 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lowhaphandu, P., Montgomery, S.L., and Lewandowski, J.J., Scripta Metall. 41, 19 (1999).Google Scholar
19.Lewandowski, J.J. and Lowhaphandu, P., Philos. Mag A. 82, 3247 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lu, J., PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA (2002).Google Scholar
21.Kim, Y.J., Busch, R., Johnson, W.L., Rulison, A.J., and Rhim, W.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2136 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Masuhr, A., Waniuk, T.A., Busch, R., and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2290 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Oguni, K., Tan, C.Y., and Ravichandran, G., J. Compos. Mater. 34, 2081 (2000).Google Scholar
24.Ma, Z. and Ravi-Chandar, K., Exp. Mech. 40, 38 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Argon, A.S., Acta Metall. 27, 47 (1979).Google Scholar
26.Spaepen, F., Acta Metall. 25, 407 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.de, P. Hey, Sietsma, J., and Beukel, A. Van den, Acta Metall. 46, 5873 (1998).Google Scholar
28.Flores, K.M., Suh, D., Howell, R., Asoka-Kumar, P., Sterne, P.A., and Dauskardt, R.H., Mater. Trans. JIM 42, 619(2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 (2000).Google Scholar