Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:57:01.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ lateral patterning of thin films of various materials deposited by physical vapor deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Chi Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
Ramki Kalyanaraman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An approach to pattern directly thin films of various materials deposited by different physical vapor deposition methods is presented. Co and Ag films deposited by pulsed laser deposition and e-beam evaporation, respectively, were fabricated into 650- and 1000-nm-spaced parallel stripes on Si(100) surfaces by simultaneous two-beam ultraviolet laser interference irradiation of the substrate surface during deposition. The resulting morphology consists of 1- to 2-nm-height stripes, which have the same direction and spacing as the interference fringes. This approach has the potential to allow long-range ordering of well-defined patterns over large areas because the spacing and geometrical patterns are defined by the laser interference. Furthermore, the fact that this method works for different materials and does not require any lithography masks, etching steps, or substrate prepatterning, makes it promising as a simple and economical lateral patterning approach.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Fan, S., Chapline, M., Franklin, N., Tombler, T., Cassell, A. and Dai, H.: Science 283 512 (1999).Google Scholar
2Gu, Q., Dang, H., Cao, J., Zhao, J. and Fan, S.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 3020 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Vossmeyer, T., Jia, S., Delonno, E., Diehl, M.R., Kim, S-H., Peng, X., Alvisatos, A.P. and Heath, J.R.: J. Appl. Phys. 84 3664 (1998).Google Scholar
4Wolf, S. and Tauber, R.N.: Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era (Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA, 1986.), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
5Savas, T.A., Farhoud, M., Smith, H.I., Hwang, M. and Ross, C.A.: J. Appl. Lett. 85 6160 (1999).Google Scholar
6Alexe, M., Scott, J.F., Curran, C., Zakharov, N.D., Hesse, D. and Pignolet, A.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 1592 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Prentiss, M., Timp, G., Bigelow, N., Behringer, R.E. and Cunningham, J.E.: Appl. Phys. Lett. 60 8 (1992).Google Scholar
8McClelland, J.J., Scholten, R.E., Palm, E.C. and Celotta, R.J.: Science 262 877 (1993).Google Scholar
9Zhang, C. and Kalyanaraman, R.: Appl. Phys. Lett., 83 4827 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Bäuerle, D.Laser Processing and Chemistry, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996).Google Scholar
11Koo, J.C. and Slusher, R.E.: App. Phys. Lett. 28 614 (1976).Google Scholar
12Brueck, S.R.J. and Ehrlich, D.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 1678 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Seebauer, E.G. and Allen, C.E.: Prog. Surf. Sci. 59 265 (1995).Google Scholar