Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:26:10.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Nano-sized Microalloyed Carbonitrides and High-density Pinned Dislocations on Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance of Pipeline Steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Ming-Chun Zhao  and
Ke Yang
Ming-Chun Zhao*
Affiliation:
Steel Research Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305 0047, Japan
Ke Yang
Affiliation:
Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, People’s Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sulfide stress cracking (SSC) resistance was investigated by comparing acicular ferrite (AF) and ferrite-pearlite (FP) in a microalloyed steel and in a non-microalloyedsteel. In microalloyed steel, AF exhibited better SSC resistance than FP, while in non-microalloyed steel, AF presented far worse SSC resistance than FP. In microalloyed steel, nano-sized carbonitrides and high-density pinned dislocations in AF were analyzed to behave as innocuous hydrogen traps, offering numerous sites for hydrogen redistribution and modifying critical cracking conditions. Dislocations in AF of microalloyed steel in the final analysis are attributed to pinning by the nano-sized carbonitrides.

Keywords

DislocationsEmbrittlementSecond phases
Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 20 , Issue 9 , September 2005 , pp. 2248 - 2251
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Janzen, T.S. and Horner, W.N. The alliance pipeline—A design short in long distance gas transmission, in Proc. International Pipeline Conf. (ASME, New York, NY, 1998), p. 83.Google Scholar
2 Workshops on the summarization of X70 grade pipeline steel trial productions. Dec. 18–21, 2000, Langfang, China (West-East Natural Gas Transportation Project Management Organization of Petrochina Co. Ltd. 2000), p. 3.Google Scholar
3Charbonnier, J.C., Margot-Marette, H., Brass, A.M. and Aucouturier, M.: Sulfide stress cracking of high-strength modified Cr-Mo steels. Metall. Trans. A 16A, 935 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Lopez, H.F., Raghunath, R., Albarran, J.L. and Martinez, L.: Microstructural aspects of sulfide stress cracking in an API X-80 pipeline steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27A, 3601 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 NACE Standard TM0177-96. Laboratory Testing of Metals for Resistance to Specific Forms of Environmental Cracking in H2S Environments. (NACE International, Houston, TX, 1996).Google Scholar
6Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Y.B., Chu, W.Y. and Hsiao, C.M.: Hydrogen-induced cracking of Ti-24Al-11Nb at room-temperature. Scripta Metall. Mater. 29, 975 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Brown, B.F.: Stress Corrosion Cracking in High Strength Steels and in Titanium and Aluminum Alloys, edited by Brown, B.F. (Washington, DC, 1972), p. 34.Google Scholar
8Zhao, M.C., Yang, K. and Shan, Y.Y.: The effects of thermo-mechanical control process on microstructures and mechanical properties of a commercial pipeline steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 335, 14 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Zhao, M.C., Yang, K., Xiao, F.R. and Shan, Y.Y.: Continuous cooling transformation of undeformed and deformed low carbon pipeline steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355, 126 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Smith, Y.E., Coldren, A.P. and Cryderman, R.L. Mn-Nb-Mo acicular ferrite steels, with high strength and toughness, in Toward Improved Ductility and Toughness (Climax Molybdenum Company, Tokyo, Japan, 1972), p. 119.Google Scholar
11Lopez, H.F., Bharadwaj, R., Albarran, J.L. and Martinez, L.: The role of heat treating on the sour gas resistance of an X-80 steel for oil and gas transport. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 30A, 2419 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Margot-Marette, H., Bardou, G. and Charbonnier, J.C.: The application of the slow strain rate test method for the development of linepipe steels resistant to sulfide stress cracking. Corros. Sci. 27, 1009 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Zhao, M.C., Tang, B., Shan, Y.Y. and Yang, K.: Role of microstructure on sulfide stress cracking of oil and gas pipeline steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34A, 1089 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Pressouyre, G.M. and Bernstein, I.M.: Kinetic trapping model for hydrogen-induced cracking. Acta Metall. 27, 89 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Zhao, M.C. and Yang, K.: Strengthening and improvement of sulfide stress cracking resistance in acicular ferrite pipeline steels by nano-sized carbonitrides. Scripta Mater. 52, 881 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Tsuchida, T., Hara, T. and Tsuzaki, K.: Relationship between microstructure and hydrogen absorption behavior in a V-bearing high strength steel. Tetsu-to-Hagane 88, 771 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Rozenak, P., Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K.: HVEM studies of the effects of hydrogen on the deformation and fracture of aisi type 316 austenitic stainless-steel. Acta Metall. 38, 2031 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Bond, G.M., Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K.: Effects of hydrogen on deformation and fracture processes in high-purity aluminum. Acta Metall. 36, 2193 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar