Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:54:35.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annealing-induced lattice recovery in room-temperature xenon irradiated CeO2: X-ray diffraction and electron energy loss spectroscopy experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2015

Janne Pakarinen ,
Lingfeng He ,
Abdel-Rahman Hassan ,
Yongqiang Wang ,
Mahima Gupta ,
Anter El-Azab  and
Todd R. Allen
Janne Pakarinen*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA; and Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK-CEN), Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
Lingfeng He
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Abdel-Rahman Hassan
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
Yongqiang Wang
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
Mahima Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Anter El-Azab
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
Todd R. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A systematic x-ray diffraction (XRD) study was performed on room-temperature Xe-irradiated and postirradiation annealed CeO2. Large scale XRD did not show any additional irradiation-induced phases upon irradiation. Depth profiling the CeO2 (111) diffraction peak over the 150 nm deep Xe-irradiated layer (400 keV, 1 × 1020 Xe/m2) by grazing incidence XRD indicated a lattice expansion at the irradiated layer. Postirradiation annealing (1 h at 1000 °C) in an oxygen-containing environment removed the observed XRD features. Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) was performed for cross-sectional samples before and after postirradiation annealing. EELS showed that the Ce charge state changed from +4 to +3 at the CeO2 surface indicating the presence of O vacancies in both as-irradiated and annealed samples. EELS also indicated that the amount of O vacancies was reduced at the irradiated region by annealing. The experimental results are discussed based on electronic properties of CeO2, annihilation of oxygen vacancies, and evolution of irradiation damage.

Keywords

radiation effectsx-ray diffraction (XRD)electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 30 , Issue 9: Focus Issue: Characterization and Modeling of Radiation Damage on Materials: State of the Art, Challenges, and Protocols , 14 May 2015 , pp. 1555 - 1562
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Khalid Hattar

References

REFERENCES

Ronchi, C., Sheindlin, M., Staicu, D., and Kinoshita, M.: Effect of burn-up on the thermal conductivity of uranium dioxide up to 100.000 MWd t−1 . J. Nucl. Mater. 327, 58 (2004).Google Scholar
Yin, Q. and Savrasov, S.: Origin of low thermal conductivity in nuclear fuels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 225504 (2008).Google Scholar
Deng, B., Chernatynskiy, A., Shukla, P., Sinnott, S., and Phillpot, S.: Effects of edge dislocations on thermal transport in UO2 . J. Nucl. Mater. 434, 203 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noirot, J., Desgranges, L., and Lamontagne, J.: Detailed characterisations of high burn-up structures in UO2 . J. Nucl. Mater. 372, 318 (2008).Google Scholar
Aidhy, D.S., Wolf, D., and El-Azab, A.: Comparison of point-defect clustering in irradiated CeO2 and UO2: A unified view from molecular dynamics simulations and experiments. Scr. Mater. 65, 867 (2011).Google Scholar
Edmondson, P.D., Zhang, Y., Moll, S., Varga, T., Namavar, F., and Weber, W.J.: Anomalous grain growth in the surface region of a nanocrystalline CeO2 film under low-temperature heavy ion irradiation. Phys. Rev. B 85, 214113 (2012).Google Scholar
Shimizu, K., Kosugi, S., Tahara, Y., Yasunaga, K., Kaneta, Y., Ishikawa, N., Hori, F., Matsui, T., and Iwase, A.: Change in magnetic properties induced by swift heavy ion irradiation in CeO2 . Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 286, 291 (2012).Google Scholar
Chen, M.Y., Zu, X.T., Xiang, X., and Zhang, H.: Effects of ion irradiation and annealing on optical and structural properties of CeO2 films on sapphire. Phys. B 389, 263 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, N., Chimi, Y., Michikami, O., Ohta, Y., Ohhara, K., Lang, M., and Neumann, R.: Study of structural change in CeO2 irradiated with high-energy ions by means of X-ray diffraction measurement. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 266, 3033 (2008).Google Scholar
Weber, W.J.: Alpha-irradiation damage in CeO2, UO2, and PuO2 . Radiat. Eff. 83, 145 (1984).Google Scholar
Schwab, R.G., Steiner, R.A., Mages, G., and Beie, H-J.: Properties of CeO2 and CeO2−x films Part II. High temperature properties. Thin Solid Films 207, 288 (1992).Google Scholar
Borodin, V.A., Ryazanov, A.I., and Sherstennikov, D.G.: Low-temperature swelling of metals and ceramics. J. Nucl. Mater. 202, 169 (1993).Google Scholar
Ziegler, J.F.: SRIM-2003. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 219–220, 1027 (2004).Google Scholar
Stoller, R.E., Toloczko, M.B., Was, G.S., Certain, A.G., and Garner, F.A.: On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 310, 75 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinebretiere, R.: X-ray Diffraction by Polycrystalline Materials (ISTE Ltd., London, UK, 2007).Google Scholar
Hubblell, J. and Seltzer, S.: Tables of X-Ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients (version 1.4). Available at http://physics.nist.gov/xaami (accessed March 5, 2013). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, (2013).Google Scholar
Wojdyr, M.: Fityk: A general-purpose peak fitting program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 1126 (2010).Google Scholar
Skorodumova, N.V., Simak, S.I., Lundqvist, B.I., Abrikosov, I.A., and Johansson, B.: Quantum origin of the oxygen storage capability of ceria. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 166601 (2002).Google Scholar
Hojo, H., Mizoguchi, T., Ohta, H., and Yamamoto, T.: Atomic structure of CeO2 grain boundary: The role of oxygen vacancies. Nano Lett. 10, 4668 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sattonnay, G., Garrido, F., and Thome, L.: Behavior of helium in UO2 single crystals, a transmission electron microscopy investigation. Philos. Mag. Lett. 84, 109 (2004).Google Scholar
Ohno, H., Iwase, A., Matsumura, D., Nishihata, Y., Mizuki, J., Ishikawa, N., Baba, Y., Hirao, N., Sonoda, T., and Kinoshita, M.: Study on effects of swift heavy ion irradiation in cerium dioxide using synchrotron radiation X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 266, 3013 (2008).Google Scholar
Willis, J.R., Bitllough, R., and Stoneham, A.M.: The effect of dislocation loops on the lattice parameter, determined by X-ray diffraction. Philos. Mag. A 48, 95 (1983).Google Scholar
Sattonnay, G., Vincent, L., Garrido, F., and Thome, L.: Xenon versus helium behavior in UO2 single crystals: A TEM investigation. J. Nucl. Mater. 355, 131 (2006).Google Scholar
He, L.F., Gupta, M., Yablinsky, C.A., Gan, J., Kirk, M.A., Bai, X-A., Pakarinen, J., and Allen, T.R.: In situ TEM observation of dislocation evolution in Kr-irradiated UO2 single crystal. J. Nucl. Mater. 443, 71 (2013).Google Scholar
Sabathier, C., Vincent, L., Garcia, P., Garrido, F., Carlot, G., Thome, L., Martin, P., and Valota, C.: In situ TEM study of temperature-induced fission product precipitation in UO2 . Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 266, 3027 (2008).Google Scholar
Fortner, J. and Buck, E.: The chemistry of the light rare-earth elements as determined by electron energy loss spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3817–3819 (1996).Google Scholar
Garvie, L.A.J. and Buseck, P.R.: Determination of Ce4+/Ce3+ in electron-beam-damaged CeO2 by electron energy-loss spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 60, 1943 (1999).Google Scholar
Hassan, A-R., El-Azab, A., Yablinsky, C., and Allen, T.: Defect disorder in UO2 . J. Solid State Chem. 204, 136 (2013).Google Scholar
Zinkevich, M., Djurovic, D., and Aldinger, F.: Thermodynamic modelling of the cerium-oxygen system. Solid State Ionics 177, 989 (2006).Google Scholar
Zacherle, T., Schriever, A., De Souza, R.A., and Martin, M.: Ab initio analysis of the defect structure in ceria. Phys. B 87, 134104 (2013).Google Scholar
DeSouza, R.A.: The formation of equilibrium space-charge zones at grain boundaries in perovskite oxide SrTiO3 . Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 9939 (2009).Google Scholar
Morrison, S.: The Chemical Physics of Surfaces (Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1977).Google Scholar
Sheldon, B.W. and Shenoy, V.B.: Space charge induced surface stresses: Implication in ceria and other ionic solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 216104 (2011).Google Scholar
McEachern, R.J. and Taylor, P.: A review of the oxidation of uranium dioxide at temperatures below 400 °C. J. Nucl. Mater. 254, 87 (1998).Google Scholar