Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:56:57.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multilevel study of factors for cultivating self-efficacy in the online game industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2017

Chia-Ying Li  and
Chiun-Yi Tsai
Chia-Ying Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
Chiun-Yi Tsai
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Political Economy, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Self-efficacy is not a phenomenon solely applicable to the individual; it may be applicable to several levels within an organisation. Although the theoretical development of efficacy beliefs has been discussed, few studies have investigated how to enhance self-efficacy through individual motivation or management policies. After collecting data from 414 employees of 38 research and development teams, multilevel analyses are conducted to empirically integrate efficacy beliefs at the individual and team levels in a moderated mediation model. The results indicate that self-efficacy mediates the effects of both learning orientation and affective commitment on group efficacy, which further facilitates innovation effectiveness. Training not only affects self-efficacy, but also moderates the mediation effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between learning orientation and group efficacy. Moreover, goal clarity moderates the mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between affective commitment and group efficacy.

Keywords

self-efficacyinnovation effectivenesslearning orientationaffective commitmenttraining
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 672 - 694
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977b). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: Social theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy—The exercise of control. New York: H. W. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Pschychological Science, 9, 75–78.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805–815.Google Scholar
Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., & Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86–104.Google Scholar
Baron, L., & Morin, L. (2010). The impact of executive coaching on self-efficacy related to management soft-skills. Leadership & Organization, 31(1), 18–38.Google Scholar
Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 587–598.Google Scholar
Bell, B. A., Morgan, G. B., Kromrey, J. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2010). The impact of small cluster size on multilevel models: A Monte Carlo examination of two-level models with binary and continuous predictors. Paper presented at the JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section. Joint Statistical Meetings in Vancouver, British Columbia, July 31 to August 5, 2010.Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D. (Ed.) (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Borgogni, L., Dello Russo, S., & Latham, G. (2011). The relationship of employee perceptions of the immediate supervisor and top management with collective efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Brazeal, D., Schenkel, M., & Azriel, J. (2008). Awakening the entrepreneurial spirit: Exploring the relationship between organizational factors and perceptions of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and desirability in a corporate setting. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 9–25.Google Scholar
Brown, S. P., Jones, E., & Leigh, T. W. (2005). The attenuating effect of role overload in relationships linking self-efficacy and goal level to work performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 972–979.Google Scholar
Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Burroughs, J. E., Dahl, D. W., Moreau, C. P., Chattopadhyay, A., & Gorn, G. J. (2011). Facilitating and rewarding creativity during new product development. Journal of Marketing, 75, 53–67.Google Scholar
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246.Google Scholar
Chang, T. S., Ku, C. Y., & Fu, H. P. (2013). Grey theory analysis of online population and online game industry revenue in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(1), 175–185.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295–316.Google Scholar
Chen, G., & Bliese, P. (2002). The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 549–556.Google Scholar
Chen, G., Gully, M. S., & Eden, D. (2004). General self-efficacy and self-esteem: Toward theoretical and empirical distinction between correlated self-evaluations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 375–395.Google Scholar
Chiocchio, F., Rabbat, F., & Lebel, P. (2015). Multi-level efficacy evidence of a combined interprofessional collaboration and project management training program for healthcare project teams. Project Management Journal, 46(4), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21507.Google Scholar
Choi, H. J., & Park, J.-H. (2014). The relationship between learning transfer climates and innovation in public and private organizations in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 35(7), 956–972.Google Scholar
Choi, J. N., Price, R. H., & Vinokur, A. D. (2003). Self-efficacy changes in groups: Effects of diversity, leadership, and group climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(4), 357–372.Google Scholar
Choi, J. N., Sung, S. Y., Lee, K., & Cho, D.-S. (2011). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 107–124.Google Scholar
Choi, J. N., & Yoon, J. (2009). Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 245–253.Google Scholar
Churchill, G. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73.Google Scholar
Cox, L. W., Muller, S. L., & Moss, S. E. (2002). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Education, 1(2), 229–247.Google Scholar
Depoorter, B. (2014). Law and technology: What happened to video game piracy? Association for computing machinery. Communications of the ACM, 57(5), 33–34.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. (1954). The principles of management. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Durham, C. C., Locke, E. A., Poon, J. M. L., & McLeod, P. L. (2000). Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information-seeking strategy, and performance. Human Performance, 13(2), 115–139.Google Scholar
Durmuşoğlu, S. S., & Barczak, G. (2011). The use of information technology tools in new product development phases: Analysis of effects on new product innovativeness, quality, and market performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 321–330.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychological Press.Google Scholar
Earley, P. C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 89–117.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22.Google Scholar
Edwin, A. L., Frederick, E., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241–251.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507.Google Scholar
Ernkvist, M., & Ström, P. (2008). Enmeshed in games with the government: Governmental policies and the development of the Chinese online game industry. Games and Culture, 3, 98–126.Google Scholar
Florin, J., Karri, R., & Rossiter, N. (2007). Fostering entrepreneurial drive in business education: An attitudinal approach. Journal of Management Education, 31(1), 17–42.Google Scholar
Gellatly, I. R., & John, P. M. (1992). The effects of goal difficulty on physiological arousal, cognition, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 694–704.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B. (2001). Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(7), 789–808.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective cognition in action: Accumulation, interaction, examination, and accommodation in the development and operation of group efficacy beliefs in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 438–458.Google Scholar
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183–211.Google Scholar
Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Y. R. F., van Knippenberg, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2014). Nothing succeeds like moderation: a social self-regulation perspective on cultural dissimilarity and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1284–1308.Google Scholar
Guzzo, R. A., Jette, R. D., & Katzell, R. A. (1985). The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on worker productivity: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38(2), 275–291.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Hasan, B., & Ali, J. (2007). An empirical examination of factors affecting group effectiveness in information systems projects. Decision Sciences Journal, 5(2), 229–243.Google Scholar
Hill, A. D., Craig Wallace, J., Ridge, J. W., Johnson, P. D., Paul, J. B., & Suter, T. A. (2014). Innovation and effectiveness of co-founded ventures: A process model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9306-9.Google Scholar
Hodges, C. B., & Murphy, P. F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy beliefs of students in a technology-intensive asynchronous college algebra course. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 93–97.Google Scholar
Hu, B., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Creative self-efficacy mediates the relationship between knowledge sharing and employee innovation. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(5), 815–826.Google Scholar
Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., & Obschonka, M. (2016). Unraveling the ‘passion orchestra’ in academia. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(3), 344–364.Google Scholar
Illia, L., Bonaiuto, M., Pugliese, E., & Rekom, J. v. (2011). Managing membership threats through collective efficacy. Journal of Business Research, 64, 631–639.Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 596–616.Google Scholar
Jugert, P., Greenaway, K. H., Barth, M., Büchner, R., Eisentraut, S., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 12–23.Google Scholar
Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525–544.Google Scholar
Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 499–524.Google Scholar
Katz-Navon, T. Y., & Erez, M. (2005). When collective-and self-efficacy affect team performance: The role of task interdependence. Small Group Research, 36(4), 437–465.Google Scholar
Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18(3), 489–501.Google Scholar
Kellett, J. B., Humphrey, R. H., & Sleeth, R. G. (2009). Career development, collective efficacy, and individual task performance. Career Development International, 14(6), 534–546.Google Scholar
Kickul, J., Wilson, F., Marlino, D., & Barbosa, S. D. (2008). Are misalignments of perceptions and self-efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intentions among our nation’s teens? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 321–335.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organization: Foundations, extensions, and new directions . San Francisco, CA: Jowwey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kohli, A. K., Shervani, T. A., & Challagalla, G. N. (1998). Learning and performance orientation of salespeople: The role of supervisors. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 263–274.Google Scholar
Lale Gumusluoglu, A. I. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461–473.Google Scholar
Latham, G., & Locke, E. A. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. The American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.Google Scholar
Lee, C., & Farh, J.-L. (2004). Joint effects of group efficacy and gender diversity on group cohesion and performance. Applied Psychology, 53(1), 136–154.Google Scholar
Lee, S. C., Suh, Y. H., Kim, J. K., & Lee, K. J. (2004). A cross-national market segmentation of online game industry using SOM. Expert Systems with Applications, 27(4), 559–570.Google Scholar
Lin, C., & Peng, T. (2010). From organizational citizenship behaviour to team performance: The mediation of group cohesion and collective efficacy. Management and Organization Review, 6(1), 55–75.Google Scholar
Lin, H.-F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755272.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation performance in new product development teams in China’s technology ventures: The role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2011). Service marketing: people, technology, strategy (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Marchand, A., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2013). Value creation in the video game industry: Industry economics, consumer benefits, and research opportunities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 141–157.Google Scholar
Markman, G. D., Balkin, D. B., & Baron, R. A. (2002). Inventors and new venture formation: The effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 149–165.Google Scholar
Marrone, J. A., Tesluk, P. E., & Carson, J. B. (2007). A multiple investigation of antecedents and consequences of team member boundary-spanning behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1423–1439.Google Scholar
McGee, J., Peterson, M., Mueller, S., & Sequeira, J. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Gellatly, I. R. (1998). Perceived performance norm as a mediator in the effect of assigned goal on personal goal and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 410–420.Google Scholar
Min, J., & Oh, Y. K. (2015). The market valuation of pre-registration for firms in the online gaming industry. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(5), 1789–1798.Google Scholar
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852–863.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H., Groth, M., & Johnson, A. (2016). When the going gets tough, the tough keep working: Impact of emotional labor on absenteeism. Journal of Management, 42(3), 615–643.Google Scholar
Nsenduluka, E., & Shee, H. K. (2009). Organisational and group antecedents of work group service innovativeness. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(4), 438–451.Google Scholar
Osca, A., Urien, B., Gonzalez-Camino, G., Martinez-Perez, M. D., & Martinez-Perez, N. (2005). Organisational support and group efficacy: A longitudinal study of main and buffer effects. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(3/4), 292–311.Google Scholar
Pan, W., Sun, L.-Y., & Chow, I. H. S. (2012). Leader-member exchange and employee creativity: Test of a multilevel moderated mediation model. Human Performance, 25(5), 432–451.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., & Zhao, C. (2007). Group efficacy in asynchronous vs. multi-synchronous virtual teams: An empirical study. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT, Part I (Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol 4662, 45–58.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2010). Monte Carlo method for assessing multilevel mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects in 1-1-1 multilevel models [Computer software]. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from http://quantpsy.org/.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rhee, H.-S., Kim, C., & Ryu, Y. U. (2009). Self-efficacy in information security: Its influence on end users’ information security practice behavior. Computers & Security, 28(8), 816–826.Google Scholar
Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 163–184.Google Scholar
Riketta, M., & Landerer, A. (2002). Organizational commitment, accountability, and work behavior: A correlational study. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(7), 653–660.Google Scholar
Royle, M. T., Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2005). The interactive effects of accountability and job self-efficacy on organizational citizenship behavior and political behavior. Organizational Analysis, 13(1), 53–71.Google Scholar
Saks, A. M. (1995). Longitudinal field investigation of the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy on the relationship between training and newcomer adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 211–225.Google Scholar
Sawyer, J. (1992). Goal and process clarity: Specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 130–143.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. W. (2007). The relationship between satisfaction with workplace training and overall job satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(4), 481–498.Google Scholar
Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Wolfe, M. (2011). Moving forward from project failure: Negative emotions, affective commitment, and learning from the experience. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1229–1259.Google Scholar
Shin, S. J., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212.Google Scholar
Simosi, M. (2010). The role of social socialization tactics in the relationship between socialization content and newcomers’ affective commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3), 301–327.Google Scholar
Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251.Google Scholar
Ström, P., & Ernkvist, M. (2014). Product and service interaction in the Chinese online game industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 4(5), 6–17.Google Scholar
Tasa, K., Sears, G. J., & Schat, A. C. H. (2011). Personality and teamwork behavior in context: The cross-level moderating role of collective efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 65–85.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.Google Scholar
van Beuningen, J., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2011). The power of self-efficacy change during service provision: Making your customers feel better about themselves pays off. Journal of Service Research: JSR, 14(1), 108–126.Google Scholar
Vinarski-Peretz, H., Binyamin, G., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Subjective relational experiences and employee innovative behaviors in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(2), 290–304.Google Scholar
Walumbwa, F., & Hartnell, C. (2011). Understanding transformational leadership-employee performance links: The role of relational identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 153–172.Google Scholar
Wang, R.-T., & Lin, C.-P. (2012). Understanding innovation performance and its antecedents: A socio-cognitive model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(2), 210–225.Google Scholar
Watson, C. B., Chemers, M. M., & Preiser, N. (2001). Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 1057–1068.Google Scholar
Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1995). The differential effects of software training previews on training outcomes. Journal of Management, 21(4), 757–787.Google Scholar
Whitney, K. (1994). Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy. Human Performance, 7(1), 55–79.Google Scholar
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989a). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407–415.Google Scholar
Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1989b). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14, 361–384.Google Scholar
Wu, L.-W., Lii, Y.-s., & Wang, C.-Y. (2015). Managing innovation through co-production in interfirm partnering. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2248–2253.Google Scholar
Ye, S., Chen, H., & Jin, X. (2006). An empirical study of what drives users to share knowledge in virtual communities. In J. Lang, F. Lin, & J. Wang (Eds.), Knowledge science, engineering and management (pp. 563–757). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Yoo, C., Yang, D., Kim, H., & Heo, E. (2012). Key value drivers of startup companies in the new media industry – The case of online games in Korea. Journal of Media Economics, 25(4), 244–260.Google Scholar
Zampetakis, L., Beldekos, P., & Moustakis, V. (2009). Day-to-day’ entrepreneurship within organisations: The role of trait emotional intelligence and perceived organisational support. European Management Journal, 27(3), 165–175.Google Scholar
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265–1272.Google Scholar