Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T08:38:21.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Andrew Spencer, Morphological theory: an introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 1991. Pp. xviii + 512.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy
Affiliation:
Department of English Language and Literature, University of Canterbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , September 1992 , pp. 509 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, D. (1987). Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Lg 51. 639–671.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronneberger-Sibold, E. (1980). Sprachverwendung - Sprachsystem: Ökonomie und Wandel. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, O. (1987). The aim of morphological change is a good mixture-not a uniform language type. In Ramat, A. G., Carruba, O. & Bernini, G. (eds) Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam:Benjamins. 591–606.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1985). The relationship between morphophonology and morphosyntax: the case of Romance causatives. LIn 16. 247–289.Google Scholar