Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T23:22:55.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Waiting to Exhale: Chaos, Toxicity and the Origins of the U.S. Chemical Warfare Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Andrew Ede
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 2008, Susan L. Smith published “Mustard Gas and American Race-Based Human Experimentation in World War II.” Research, undertaken by the US Army, attempted to quantify the effect of mustard gas (actually a volitile liquid) and othe chemical agents on people from different racial groups. This was based on the idea that different races would respond differently to the toxins, and in particular that this would be evident through dermal reaction. In other words, different skin color might mean different skin constitution. Some of the testing seemed reasonable, since new chemicals and equipment had been developed since 1919, and the racial issue added another dimension to the research. On closer examination, the testing was primarily based on old chemical agents such as mustard gas, Lewisite and phosgene, and thus the extent of the testing seemed scientifically and medically unnecessary. The chemical agents had been developed, tested, used in battle, the wounded treated and the dead subjected to detailed pathological study. The major combatants in World War I had all committed extensive scientific resources to the study of these agents looking at both offensive and defensive aspects of their use, including toxicity testing. The U.S. Chemical Warfare Service (CWS) had been formed in 1918 to specifically deal with issues such as toxicity tests, so why was the U.S. Army revisiting the subject of chemical weapons testing during World War II?

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , Spring 2011 , pp. 28 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Smith, S. L., “Mustard Gas and American Race-Based Human Experimentation in World War II,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 3 (2008): 517–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, R. W., The Conduct of Life IV - Culture (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1892): At 140.Google Scholar
Cochrane, R. C., The National Academy of Sciences: The First Hundred Years, 1863–1963 (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1978): At 212.Google Scholar
Id., at 214–5.Google Scholar
Id., at 225.Google Scholar
Records of the Council of National Defense [CND], Record Group 62, 1915–37, 62.1 National Archives and Records Administration (hereafter NARA).Google Scholar
Brophy, L. P. and Fisher, G. J. B., The Chemical Warfare Service: Organizing for War (Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1959): At 35.Google Scholar
Ayres, L. P., The War With Germany: A Statistical Summary (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1919).Google Scholar
Brophy, and Fisher, , supra note 7; Brophy, L. P., Miles, W. D. and Cochrane, R. C., The Chemical Warfare Service: From Laboratory to Field (Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1959); Klever, B. E. and Birdsell, D., The Chemical Warfare Service: Chemicals in Combat (Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1966).Google Scholar
Prentiss, A. M., Chemicals In War (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937).Google Scholar
Correspondence, 1918, Records of the Chemical Warfare Service, Record Group 175 1917–63,175.3.2. NARA.Google Scholar
Memorandum, May, 1918, Records of the Chemical Warfare Service, Record Group 175 1917–63,175.3.2. NARA.Google Scholar
Marshall, E. K. Jr., Memorandum, May, 1918, Records of the Chemical Warfare Service, Record Group 175 1917–63, 175.3.2. NARA.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Lovenhart, A. S., Memorandum, May, 1918, Records of the Chemical Warfare Service, Record Group 175 1917–63, 175.3.2 NARA.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Pappenheimer, A. M. and Vance, M., “The Effects of Intravenous Injections of Dichloroethylsulfide in Rabbits, with Special Reference to its Leucotoxic Action,” Journal of Experimental Medicine XXXI (1920): 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, H., Memorandum, October, 1921, Records of the Chemical Warfare Service, Record Group 175 1917–63, 175.2. NARA.Google Scholar
Vilensky, J., Dew of Death: The Story of Lewisite, America's World War I Weapon of Mass Destruction (Bloomington, IN.: Indiana University Press, 2005): 30–32.Google Scholar
Various memos on accidents and injuries, Records of the Chemical Warfare Service, Record Group 175 1917–63,175.2 NARA.Google Scholar