Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T02:59:23.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Federal Preemption in Injury Prevention Litigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jon S. Vernick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 2007, there were 182,479 injury-related deaths in the United States — including homicides, suicides, and unintentional injuries – making injuries the leading cause of death for persons under age 45. Also in 2007, nearly 30 million Americans suffered a non-fatal injury serious enough to warrant hospital treatment. The lifetime cost of fatal and non-fatal injuries occurring in 2000 is estimated to exceed $400 billion.

Efforts to prevent injuries have often focused on changes to the built environment or potentially dangerous products to reduce risks. Building safety into a product or environment — especially in ways that require little or no user action to confer protection — is often more effective than trying to change consumer behavior. For example, improving the crashworthiness of cars through design changes such as air bags, fire-resistant fuel systems, or electronic stability programs, is more effective than simply trying to teach operators to become safer drivers.

Type
JLME Supplement
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 39 , Issue S1 , Spring 2011 , pp. 85 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), available at <http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal.html> (last visited December 14, 2010).+(last+visited+December+14,+2010).>Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), available at <http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/nonfatal.html> (last visited December 14, 2010).+(last+visited+December+14,+2010).>Google Scholar
Finkelstein, E. A. Corso, P. A. Miller, T. R. Associates, , The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006): at 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernick, J. S. Sapsin, J. W. Teret, S. P. Mair, J. S., “How Litigation Can Promote Product Safety,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32, no. 4 (2004): 551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teret, S. P., “Litigating for the Public's Health,” American Journal of Public Health 76 (1986): 1027–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Const., art. VI.Google Scholar
Nowak, J. E. Rotunda, R. D., Constitutional Law, 8th ed. (St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters, 2010): at 397.Google Scholar
See e.g., Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992).Google Scholar
Vernick, J. S. Teret, S. P., “New Courtroom Strategies Regarding Firearms: Tort Litigation against Firearm Manufacturers and Constitutional Challenges to Gun Laws,” Houston Law Review 36 (1999): 1713–1753.Google Scholar
Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, Pub. L. No. 109–92,119 Stat 2095, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 7901 et seq. (2010).Google Scholar
Vernick, J. S. Rutkow, L. Salmon, D. A., “Availability of Litigation as a Public Health Tool for the Firearm Injury Prevention: Comparison of Guns, Vaccines, and Motor Vehicles,” American Journal of Public Health 97 (2007): 1991–1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 360c et seq. (2010).Google Scholar
21 U.S.C. § 360k(a) (2010).Google Scholar
Riegel v. Medtronic, 552 U.S. 312 (2008).Google Scholar
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996).Google Scholar
Geier v. American Honda, 529 U.S. 861 (2000).Google Scholar
49 U.S.C. § 30103(e) (2010).Google Scholar
Geier v. American Honda, 529 U.S. 861, 882 (2000).Google Scholar
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51 (2002).Google Scholar
Vernick, J. S. et al., Motorboot Propeller Injuries (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Injury Prevention Center and Institute for Injury Reduction, 1992): at 15.Google Scholar
Federal Boat Safety Act of 1971, Pub. L. No. 92–75, 85 Stat. 213, codified at 46 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. (2010).Google Scholar
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 757 NE. 2d 75 (111. 2001).Google Scholar
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51, 65 (2002).Google Scholar
Williamson v. Mazda, 167 Cal. App. 4th 905, cert, granted, 130 S. Ct. 3348 (2010).Google Scholar
Geier v. American Honda, 529 U.S. 861, 886 (Stevens, J. dissenting).Google Scholar