Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:55:18.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risking Ethical Insolvency: A Survey of Trends in Criminal DNA Databanking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jonathan Kimmelman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over ten years have elapsed since Virginia passed the nation's first criminal DNA banking law, which authorized law enforcement authorities to collect DNA samples from certain categories of offenders for the purposes of performing profile analysis. Within nine years, Rhode Island became the fiftieth state to enact a similar statute. The passage of a decade since the first enactment provides a convenient opportunity to assess the strengths and weaknesses of ethical safeguards under present law as well as predict the likely direction of future developments.

DNA forensics are merely the latest in a long line of biologically based identifying law enforcement technologies that include fingerprints and serotyping. Nevertheless, DNA has properties that make it significantly different than its predecessors with respect to the ethical and social concerns it raises.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , Fall 2000 , pp. 209 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Herber, B. and Herold, K., “DNA Typing of Human Dandruff,” Journal of Forensic Science, 43 (1998): 648–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, R.A.H. and Jones, M.K., “DNA Fingerprints from Fingerprints.” Nature, 387 (1997): 767.Google Scholar
Hochmeister, M.N. et al., “PCR-based Typing of DNA Extracted from Cigarette Butts,” International Journal of Legal Medicine, 104 (1991): 229–233; Sweet, D. and Hildebrand, D., “Saliva from Cheese Bite Yields DNA Profile of Burglar: A Case Report,” International Journal of Legal Medicine, 112 (1999): 201–3; and Walsh, D.J. et al., “Isolation of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) from Saliva and Forensic Science Samples Containing Saliva,” Journal of Forensic Science, 37 (1992): 387–395.Google Scholar
Annas, G.J. Glantz, L.H., and Roche, P.A., “The Genetic Privacy Act and Commentary,” (Boston: Boston University School of Public Health, 1995): at 90.Google Scholar
McEwen, J.E. and Reilly, P.R., “A Review of State Legislation on DNA Forensic Data Banking,” American Journal of Human Genetics, 54 (1994): 941–958; and McEwen, J.E., “DNA Data Banks,” in Rothstein, M.A., ed., Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997): 231–251.Google Scholar
All US federal and state statute citations discussed in this text are shown in Table 1.Google Scholar
Doot, G.M., “The Secrets of the Genome Revealed: Threats to Genetic Privacy,” Wayne Law Review, 37 (1991): 1615–1645; Wilker, N.L. et al., “DNA Data Banking and the Public Interest,” in Billings, Paul R., ed., DNA on Trial: Genetic Identification and Criminal Justice (Plainview: Cold Spring Harbor Press, 1992): 141–149; and Annas, G.J., “Privacy Rules for DNA Databanks: Protecting Coded ‘Future Diaries’,” JAMA, 270 (1993): 2346–2350.Google Scholar
Beck, A.J. and Shipley, B.E., “Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1983,” U.S. Department of Justice, (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, April 1989): At 7.Google Scholar
Goldman, A., “Unabomber Case Files Trace Trail that Led to Kaczynski,” Los Angeles Times, June 14, 1996, at 1.Google Scholar
Wade, N., “F.B.I. Set to Open its DNA Database for Fighting Crime,” New York Times, Oct. 12, 1998, at A1; and Gugliotta, G., “A Rush to DNA Sampling: Vital Police Tool? Affront to Liberty? Both?”, Washington Post, July 7, 1999, at A1.Google Scholar
Pezzella, M., “FBI DNA Dragnet to Track Fugitives in 50 States,” Biotechnology Newswatch, Oct. 19, 1998, at 1.Google Scholar
For reviews of recent developments in the juvenile justice system, see Chaikin, J.M., “Changing Laws and Policies Governing Juvenile Justice Records,” in National Conference on Juvenile Justice Records: Appropriate Criminal and Noncriminal Justice Uses, (Washington, D.C., Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice, 1997): 11–14; and Schwartz, I.M., “Will the Juvenile Court System Survive?”, American Academy of Political and Social Science, 564 (1999): 8–9 and essays that follow.Google Scholar
Callaghan, T., Testimony, National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence Conference, Washington, D.C., National Institute of Justice: Sept. 26–27, 1999; and National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Board of Biology, DNA Technology in Forensic Science, (Washington, D.C.: National Acadamy Press, 1992), at 120.Google Scholar
See McEwen, , 1997, supra note 5; and Kipnis, K., “DNA Banking in the Military: An Ethical Analysis,” in Weir, R. F., ed., Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Implications, (Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1998): 329–344.Google Scholar
Weedn, V.W., “Stored Biologic Specimens for Military Identification: The Department of Defense DNA Registry,” in Weir, , id. at 345–357.Google Scholar
See Callaghan, , supra note 13.Google Scholar
Budowle, B. and Moretti, T.R., “Forensics: Analysis of Short Tandem Repeat Loci by Multiplex PCR and Real Time Fluorescence Detection During Capillary Electrophoresis,” in Epplen, J.T. and Lubjuhn, T., eds., DNA Profiling and DNA Fingerprinting, (Boston: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1999): 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See McEwen, , 1997, supra note 5; McEwen, J., “Storing Genes to Solve Crimes: Legal, Ethical, and Public Policy Considerations,” in Weir, R.F., supra note 14, at 311–28; and Reilly, P.R. and Page, D.C., “We're off to see the genome,” Nature Genetics, 20, no. 9 (1998): 15–17.Google Scholar
Anonymous, “Right to Privacy Protected by Massachusetts Decision,” Biotechnology Newswatch, Sept. 7, 1998.Google Scholar
See supra note 13.Google Scholar
See supra note 4 at 66.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Phillips, J.A. III et al., “American College of Medical Genetics Statement on the Storage and Use of Genetic Materials,” American Journal of Human Genetics, 57 (1995): 1499–1500.Google Scholar
See McEwen, , 1994 supra note 4.Google Scholar
Lawson, K., “CrimTrac to Provide Speedy Suspect Identification,” Canberra Times, July 22, 1999, at A1.Google Scholar
Anonymous, “China: Law Enforcement DNA Database Established,” BBC World Wide Monitoring—Asia Pacific, Sept. 9, 1999.Google Scholar
Pascal, C., “La France se dote d'un fichier national d'empreintes genetiques,” Le Monde, March 21, 2000.Google Scholar
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act, Part IV, 1994.Google Scholar
Criminal Code RSC 1985, Chapter C-46, s.487 et seq. (1996).Google Scholar
Benecke, M., “DNA Typing in Forensic Medicine and Criminal Investigations: A Current Survey,” Naturwissenschaften, 84 (1997): 181–8; and Peerenboom, E., “Central Criminal DNA Database Created in Germany,” Nature Biotechnology, 16 (1998): 510–11.Google Scholar
Morton, J., A Guide to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act of 1994 (London: Butterworths, 1994): at 33–34.Google Scholar
Blair, J., “Police Chiefs Join in Call for More DNA Sampling,” New York Times, Aug. 16, 1999, at B5.Google Scholar
Werrett, D., Testimony, National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence Conference, Oak Brook, IL, National Institute of Justice, June 8, 1998.Google Scholar
Anonymous, “Fed: Mass DNA Screenings OK if Voluntary, says Williams,” AAP Newsfeed, Apr. 16, 2000.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.A., “A Forensic Blood Bank? RCMP solve a murder by soliciting DNA samples, but have not returned them, ”British Columbia Report, Sept. 13, 1999, at 43.Google Scholar
See Peerenboom, , supra note 30.Google Scholar
Fereday, L., Testimony, “Technology Development: DNA from Fingerprints,” National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence Conference, Boston, National Institute of Justice, July 25–26, 1999.Google Scholar
Criminal Code RSC 1985, Chapter C-46, s.487 et seq. (1996).Google Scholar
I thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this point to my attention; see also David Boyd, Speech, Fifth Annual Conference on the Future of DNA: Implications for the Criminal Justice System. New York, National Institute of Justice, May 8, 2000, at 20.Google Scholar
DeFrances, C.J. and Steadman, G.W., Prosecutions in State Courts, 1996, (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1998); Hicks, J.W. and Weedn, V., “The Unrealized Potential of DNA Testing,” in NIJ: Research in Action, (Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, June, 1998); and supra note 33.Google Scholar
See supra note 8 at 6.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
See McEwen, , 1997 supra note 5; and Hibbert, M., “DNA Databanks: Law Enforcement's Greatest Surveillance Tool?”, Wake Forest Law Review, 34 (1999): At 782–786. (Hibbert, 1999; McEwen, 1997)Google Scholar
See Hibbert, , id.Google Scholar
Lambert, B., “Guiliani Backs DNA Testing of Newborns for ID,” New York Times, Dec. 17, 1998, at B4; and Smith, M., Remarks, “Legal Issues Working Group Report: Constitutional Analysis of Arrestee DNA Sampling,” National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence Conference, Washington, D.C., National Institute of Justice, July 26–27, 1999.Google Scholar
Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721 (S. Ct. 1969).Google Scholar
Thom v. New York Stock Exchange, 306 F.Supp. 1002, (S.D.N.Y. 1969).Google Scholar
Woodward, J.D., “Biometric Scanning, Law and Policy: Identifying the Concerns—Drafting the Biometric Blueprint,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 59, no.3 (1997): 97–152.Google Scholar
Perkey v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 721 P.2d 50, 55–56 (Cal. 1986).Google Scholar
Fried, C., “Privacy,” Yale Law Journal, 77 (1968): 475–93.Google Scholar
See id. at 486.Google Scholar
Sjerps, M. and Kloosterman, A.D., “On the Consequences of DNA Profile Mismatches for Close Relatives of an Excluded Suspect,” International Journal of Legal Medicine, 112 (1999): 176–180.Google Scholar
Sterngold, J., “Investigation into Police is Broadened in Los Angeles,” New York Times, Feb. 24, 2000, at A12.Google Scholar
Snyder, H.N. and Sickmund, M., “Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report,” National Center for Juvenile Justice, (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1999).Google Scholar
Butterfield, F., “Racial Disparities Seen as Pervasive in Juvenile Justice,” New York Times, April 26, 2000, at A1; and Males, M. and Macallair, D., “The Color of Justice: An Analysis of Juvenile-Adult Court Transfers in California,” (San Francisco: Justice Policy Institute, 2000).Google Scholar
Bonczar, T.P. and Beck, A.J., “Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison,” U.S. Department of Justice, (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1997): At 1.Google Scholar
Merz, J.F., and Sankar, P., “DNA Banking: An Empirical Study of a Proposed Consent Form,” in Weir, , supra note 14 at 198–235.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics, “Correctional Populations in the US, 1996,” Department of Justice (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, April, 1999), at Table 1.28.Google Scholar
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993).Google Scholar
See National Academy of Sciences, supra note 13, at 120.Google Scholar
Trischitta, L., “As DNA Use Rises, So Do Concerns,” The Times Union, March 3, 2000, at A1; and Callaghan, , supra note 13.Google Scholar
Belgrader, P. et al., “Rapid PCR for Identity Testing Using a Battery-Powered Miniature Thermal Cycler,” Journal of Forensic Science, 43, (1998): 315–19.Google Scholar
Butler, J.M. et al., “Rapid Analysis of the Short Tandem Repeat HUMTHO1 by Capillary Electrophoresis,” Biotechniques, 17, (1994): 1062–70.Google Scholar
Radtkey, R. et al., “Rapid, high fidelity analysis of simple sequene repeats on an electronically active DNA microchip,” Nucleic Acids Research, 28, no. 7, (2000): e17i–vi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See supra note 17.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, D.E., “Seeking Answers, Census is Stirring Privacy Questions,” New York Times, April 1, 2000, at A1.Google Scholar