Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:16:10.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional Efforts to Promote Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes: Challenges and Opportunities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Elizabeth H. Bradley ,
Barbara B. Blechner ,
Leslie C. Walker  and
Terrie T. Wetle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past two decades, several reports have documented substantial support from clinicians, policy-makers, and the general public for the use of advance directives, yet studies continue to find that only a minority of individuals (10 to 25 percent) have completed these legal documents. Advance directives are written instructions, such as living wills or durable powers of attorney for health care, which describe an individual's medical treatment wishes in the event that individual becomes incapacitated in the future. The completion and use of advance directives is one of several components of the broader activity of advance care planning, that is, the overall planning and communication of personal wishes concerning future medical care.

In December 1991, the federal Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) became effective. Promoted as a federal initiative to enhance an individual's control over medical treatment decision making and, therefore, patient autonomy and self-determination, PSDA placed several new requirements on health care organizations receiving Medicare or Medicaid payments.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 25 , Issue 2-3 , Summer Fall 1997 , pp. 150 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Current Opinions (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1989); Orentlicher, D., “Advance Medical Directives,” JAMA, 263 (1990): 2365–67; Davidson, K. et al., “Physician Attitudes on Advance Directives,” JAMA, 262 (1989): 2415–19; and Emanuel, E. et al., “Advance Care Planning as a Process: Structuring the Discussions in Practice,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 43 (1995): 440–46.Google Scholar
Senate Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Congress, A Matter of Choice: Planning Ahead for Health Care Decisions (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987); Office of Technology Assessment, Life-Sustaining Technology and the Elderly (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, OTA-BA-306, 1988); and Committee on Finance, U.S. Congress, Hearing on End of Life Issues and Implementation of Advance Directives Under Health Care Reform (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994).Google Scholar
Emanuel, L. et al., “Advance Directives for Medical Care: A Case for Greater Use,” N. Engl. J. Med., 324 (1991): 889–95; Society for the Right to Die, The Physician and the Hopelessly Ill Patient and Supplement (New York: Society for the Right to Die, 1988); and General Accounting Office, Patient Self-Determination Act (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, GAO/HEHS-95-135, Aug. 1995).Google Scholar
See General Accounting Office, supra note 3.Google Scholar
Patient Self-Determination Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395cc, 1396a (1994). Regulations were amended in 1995 by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA). See Advance Directives: Final Rule, 60 Fed. Reg. 33262-92 (1995).Google Scholar
In addition, PSDA placed several requirements on government agencies. Federal law required the secretary of Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) to develop a national campaign with informational materials to inform the public of the option to complete advance directives. To fulfill this obligation, HCFA released a technical assistance information packet in September 1991 for health care providers as well as a press package that included a list of organizations and publications that had information on advance directives. DHHS also required each state to develop a written description of the state law concerning advance directives and has amended the Medicare Handbook to reflect the federal law's provisions. These actions are described in the Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representative. See General Accounting Office, supra note 3.Google Scholar
See Advance Directives: Final Rule, 60 Fed. Reg. 33262-92 (1995).Google Scholar
A variety of interest and advocacy groups gave congressional testimony concerning the bill that later became PSDA. The groups included the Catholic Health Association, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, the Central Conference of American Rabbis, the Elder Women's League, the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American Hospital Association, the American Bar Association, and the American Medical Association. None of these groups opposed the intent of the law. Each supported the law as promoting human dignity and personal choice. Substantial opposition did arise to certain implementation issues. The most vigorous objection was voiced by HCFA's Gail Wilensky, who argued that improved public awareness about advance directives could be accomplished without linking it to an “intrusive, cumbersome Federal requirement.” See Senate Subcomm. on Medicare and Long Term Care, Living Wills. Hearing before the Senate Subcomm. on Medicare and. Long Term Care, 101st Cong. 11 (1990) (statement of Gail Wilensky, Ph.D., Administrator, HCFA).Google Scholar
Pinch, W. et al., “Implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act: A Survey of Nebraska Hospitals,” Research in Nursing and Health, 18 (1995): 59–66; and Silverman, H. et al., “Implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act in a Hospital Setting,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 155 (1995): 502–10.Google Scholar
La Puma, J., Orentlicher, D., and Moss, R., “Advance Directives on Admission: Clinical Implications and Analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990,” JAMA, 266 (1991): 402–05.Google Scholar
Morrison, R., Morrison, E., and Glickman, D., “Physician Reluctance to Discuss Advance Directives,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 154 (1994): 2311–18.Google Scholar
Teno, J. et al., “Do Formal Advance Directives Affect Resuscitation Decisions and the Use of Resources for Seriously Ill Patients,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 5 (1994): 23–30; Office of the Inspector General, Patient Advance Directives: Facility and Patient Responses (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, OEI 06-91-01131, Aug. 1993); Janofsky, J. and Rovner, B., “Prevalence of Advance Directives and Guardianship in Nursing Home Patients,” Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 6 (1993): 214–26; Elpern, E., Yellen, S., and Burton, L., “A Preliminary Investigation of Opinions and Behaviors Regarding Advance Directives for Medical Care,” American Journal of Critical Care, 2 (1993): 161–67; Daly, M. and Sobal, J., “Advance Directives Among Patients in a House Call Program,” Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 5 (1992): 11–15; Emanuel, et al., supra note 3; and Cohen-Mansfield, J., Droge, J., and Billig, N., “The Utilization of Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care Among Hospitalized Elderly Patients,” Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 39 (1991): 1174–78.Google Scholar
Hing, E., “Use of Nursing Homes by the Elderly: Preliminary Data from the National Nursing Home Survey,” Vital Health Statistics, 135 (1987): 1–12; and Van Nostrand, J. and Miller, B., “Selected Issues in Long Term Care: Profile of Cognitive Disability,” in Health Data in Older Americans (Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, PHS 98-141, 1992): 21–30.Google Scholar
Lubitz, J. and Prihoda, R., “The Use and Costs of Medicare Services in the Last Two Years of Life,” Health Care Financing Review, 5 (1984): 117–31.Google Scholar
Hayley, D. et al., “Ethical and Legal Issues in Nursing Home Care,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 156 (1996): 249–56.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.H., “The PSDA in Nursing Homes,” Hastings Center Report, 21, Supp. (1991): S3–S4.Google Scholar
See Emanuel, et al., supra note 3; Pinch, et al., supra note 9; and Silverman, et al., supra note 9.Google Scholar
Terry, M. and Zweig, S., “Prevalence of Advance Directives and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Community Nursing Facilities,” Archives of Family Medicine, 3 (1992): 141–45; Bradley, E. et al., “Assessing Capacity to Participate in Discussions of Advance Directives in Nursing Homes: Findings from a Study of the Patient Self-Determination Act,” Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 45 (1997): 79–83; Mezey, M. et al., “Implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) in Nursing Homes in New York City,” Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 45 (1997): 43–49; and Walker, L. et al., “Problems in Implementing the Patient Self-Determination Act in Nursing Homes,” Journal of Mental Health and Aging, forthcoming.Google Scholar
See General Accounting Office, supra note 3.Google Scholar
In Connecticut, as in most states, such institutional advance care planning forms are not considered formal advance directives. Analysis of Connecticut state law in this area revealed no legislation that requires or encourages the use of what we call institutional advance care planning forms by nursing homes.Google Scholar
Recent long-term care national statistics suggest that more than 60 percent of nursing home residents have some degree of cognitive impairment. See Nostrand, Van and Miller, , supra note 13. However, because of the difficulty in measuring decisional capacity, this number may not be predictive of residents who are not capacitated to participate in advance care planning at the time of admission. In the six homes we studied, 58 percent of the residents were judged by the nursing assessment to be either partly (37.7 percent) or totally confused (20.3 percent) at admission.Google Scholar
Previous studies have shown that approximately 65 percent of nursing home residents do not have an advance directive within the first year of their admission to a nursing home. See Terry, and Zweig, , supra note 18; and Bradley, et al., supra note 18.Google Scholar
Empirical literature comparing nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes generally shows nonprofit homes to have higher quality and higher costs than for-profit homes. For a literature review, see Schlesinger, M., Marmor, T., and Smithey, R., “Nonprofit and For-Profit Medical Care: Shifting Roles and Implications for Health Policy,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 12 (1987): 427–57.Google Scholar
Reasons for nonparticipation included concurrent involvement in the state licensing process, recent layoffs of medical records staff, and expressed fear of resulting liability despite assurances of confidentiality.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Vital and Health Statistics: Trends in the Health of Older Americans: United States, 1994 (Hyattsville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Ser. 3, No. 30, Apr. 1995).Google Scholar
Department of Public Health, Hospital and Medical Care Division, State of Connecticut, Connecticut Nursing Home Directory (1991).Google Scholar
Katz, S. et al., “Studies of Illness in the Aged, The Index of ADL: A Standardized Measure of Biological and Psychological Function,” JAMA, 185 (1963): 914–19. Activities of Daily Living (ADL) used for this study were bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. Independence was measured as needing no assistance in any of these areas. This approach to measuring physical functioning is common in health services research.Google Scholar
Using data from this study, Bradley, et al. argue this may be evidence of inappropriate exclusion of oriented residents from advance care planning efforts. See Bradley, et al., supra note 18.Google Scholar
Given that most of the advance directives were completed prior to admission, one could assume that residents complete advance directives when they are decisionally capable, even if they are decisionally incapacitated at the time of admission to a nursing home.Google Scholar
Teno, J. and Lynn, J., “Putting Advance Care Planning into Action,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 7 (1996): 205–13.Google Scholar
Emanuel, L. et al., “Advance Directives: Can Patients' Stated Treatment Choices Be Used to Infer Unstated Choices?,” Medical Care, 32 (1994): 95–105; and Brett, A., “Limitations of listing Specific Medical Interventions in Advance Directives,” JAMA, 166 (1991): 825–28.Google Scholar
Procedural requirements referred to here include the requirement to provide written information about advance directives at the time of admission and to document whether residents have advance directives.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, D.E., Zimmerman, S.I., and Tompkins, C., “The Dangers of Directives or False Security Forms,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 24 (1996): 5–17.Google Scholar