Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:46:21.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Coordination of Legal-Based Efforts across Jurisdictions and Sectors for Obesity Prevention and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Aviva Must ,
Gary Bennett ,
Christina Economos ,
Elizabeth Goodman ,
Joe Schilling ,
Lisa Quintiliani ,
Sara Rosenbaum ,
Jeff Vincent  and
Marice Ashe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is the companion to the “Assessment of Coordination of Legal-Based Efforts across Jurisdictions and Sectors for Obesity Prevention and Control” paper, and the third of four papers outlining action options that policymakers can consider as discussed as part of the National Summit on Legal Preparedness for Obesity Prevention and Control. The goal of this paper is to identify potential action and policy strategies related to coordination across jurisdictions and sectors that can be adopted by policymakers and implemented by practitioners to address the obesity epidemic. The paper examines collaboration among four sectors — community agencies and organizations (with a special focus on enhancing the built environment), schools, health care institutions, and workplaces — and examines collaboration from both vertical and horizontal perspectives. Additionally, the paper is structured around three legal themes — which are posed as questions — to frame the policy action discussion:

Type
JLME Supplement
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 37 , Issue S1 , Summer 2009 , pp. 90 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See Kroplin v. Truax, 119 Ohio 610, 621 (1929); Patrick v. Riley, 209 Cal. 350, 354 (1930). State and local governments have used their police power authority to develop and enact measures to counter obesity, including the following: requiring disclosure of the nutritional content of food served in restaurants; imposing restrictions on the advertising of junk food to children; mandating school nutrition and physical education programs; calling on schools to measure students' “body mass index”; regulating the sale and marketing of junk food in schools; and enforcing mixed-use zoning rules to encourage the dispersal of supermarkets and prevent the aggregation of quick-service outlets improving opportunities and incentives for non-motorized transportation, including “safe routes to school.” See Boehmer, et al. , “Patterns of Childhood Obesity Prevention Legislation in the United States,” CDC's Preventing Chronic Disease 4, no. 3 (July 2007): At 2 and Table 1, available at http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/jul/06_0082.htm (last visited March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Id., Wisconsin's 1999 Smart Growth Law allocates more than $3 million each year to local governments to do comprehensive planning.Google Scholar
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824).Google Scholar
Mello, M. M. Rosenthal, M. B., “Wellness Programs and ‘Lifestyle Discrimination’ – The Legal Limits,” New England Journal of Medicine, 359 no. 2 (2008): 192–199.Google Scholar
See The Food Trust Web site, available at http://www.the-foodtrust.org (last visited March 5, 2009)http://www.the-foodtrust.orgGoogle Scholar
See Mello, Rosenthal, , supra> note 4; Healthy Workforce Act, July 25, 2008, available at http://www.healthpromotionadvocates.org/Fact%20Sheet%20Healthy%20Workforce%20Act.pdf (last visited March 5, 2009).+note+4;+Healthy+Workforce+Act,+July+25,+2008,+available+at+http://www.healthpromotionadvocates.org/Fact%20Sheet%20Healthy%20Workforce%20Act.pdf+(last+visited+March+5,+2009).>Google Scholar
Stoltzfus, E., “Emerging Benefits: Access to Health Promotion Benefits in the United States, Private Industry, 1999 and 2005,” July 26, 2006, available at http://www.bls.gov/opub/cwc/cm20060724ch01.htm (last visited March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
1994 ESEA, Reauthorization, the Improving America's Schools Act, Public Law 103–382.Google Scholar
Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004, Public Law 108–265, 118 Stat 729, June 30, 2004, available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/cnd/Governance/Legislation/Historical/PL_108-265.pdf (last visited March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Rudalevige, A., “The Politics of No Child Left Behind,” Education Next, 3 no. 4 (2003), available at http://www.hoover.org/publications/ednext/3346601.html (last visited March 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Weber, J. A., “Measuring Progress on School Wellness Policies: Are Nutrition Standards Making the Grade,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107 no. 8 (2007): 1293–1295.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. L. Green, L. W. Rosenthal, A. C. Husten, C. G. Khan, L. K., and Dietz, W. H., “Possible Lessons from the Tobacco Experience for Obesity Control,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 77, Supplement (2003): 1073S-1082S.Google Scholar