Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-25T15:12:46.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “Rules of the Road”: Ethics, Firearms, and the Physician's “Lane”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2021

Blake N. Shultz ,
Benjamin Tolchin  and
Katherine L. Kraschel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Physicians play a critical role in preventing and treating firearm injury, although the scope of that role remains contentious and lacks systematic definition. This piece aims to utilize the fundamental principles of medical ethics to present a framework for physician involvement in firearm violence. Physicians' agency relationship with their patients creates ethical obligations grounded on three principles of medical ethics — patient autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. Taken together, they suggest that physicians ought to engage in clinical screening and treatment related to firearm violence. The principle of beneficence also applies more generally, but more weakly, to relations between physicians and society, creating nonobligatory moral ideals. Balanced against physicians' primary obligations to patient agency relationships, general beneficence suggests that physicians may engage in public advocacy to address gun violence, although they are not ethically obligated to do so. A fourth foundational principle — justice — requires that clinicians attempt to ensure that the benefits and burdens of healthcare are distributed fairly.

Type
Online Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 48 , Issue S4: Gun Violence in America: An Interdisciplinary Examination , Winter 2020 , pp. 142 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See Coupet, E. et al., “US Emergency Department Encounters for Firearm Injuries According to Presentation at Trauma vs. Nontrauma Centers,” JAMA Surgery 154, no. 4 (2019): 360-362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, K.D. et al., “Deaths: Final Data for 2017,” National Vital Statistics Reports 68, no. 9 (2019), available at <https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3z03p2bJdu0Q-vqvdMHKDCPtPT_4DePF1xdc39uYlyl3D8sgPtnhAFI3A> (last visited September 21, 2020).Google ScholarPubMed
Studdert, D.M. et al., “Handgun Ownership and Suicide in California,” NEJM 382 (2020): 2220-2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, R., “Physicians Are Steering the Conversation about Gun Violence,” JAMA 321, no. 2 (2019): 133-135. See also Ranney, M. et al., “#ThisIsOurLane — Firearm Safety as Health Care's Highway,” NEJM 380 (2019): 405-407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
National Physicians Alliance, Policy Statement: Gun Violence — A Public Health Issue (Feb. 2013), available at <http://npalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/NPA-Policy-Stmt-Gun-Violence-A-Public-Health-Issue-021813.pdf> (last visited September 21, 2020).+(last+visited+September+21,+2020).>Google Scholar
Abir, M., “Health Care Providers and Researchers Have an Obligation to Expose the Horrors of Gun Violence,” Health Affairs Blog (Nov. 20, 2018), available at <https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20181119.463210/full/> (last visited September 21, 2020).+(last+visited+September+21,+2020).>Google Scholar
See Shultz, B. et al., “Understanding the Role of Law in Reducing Firearm Injury through Clinical Interventions,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48, no. 4, Suppl. (2020): 146-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuohy, C., “Agency, Contract, and Governance: Shifting Shapes of Accountability in the Health Care Arena,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 28, nos. 2-3 (2003): 195-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See generally, Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Id., at ch. 6.Google Scholar
See Rathore, M.H., “Physician ‘Gag Laws’ and Gun Safety,” American Medical Association Journal of Ethics (April 2014), available at <https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/physician-gag-laws-and-gun-safety/2014-04> (last visited September 20, 2020).+(last+visited+September+20,+2020).>Google Scholar
Rao, J.K. et al., “Communication Interventions Make a Difference in Conversations Between Physicians and Patients: A Systematic Review of the Evidence,” Medical Care 45, no. 4 (2007): 340-349.Google Scholar
American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 8.11(b) (2019).Google Scholar
See Brent, D.A. et al., “Compliance with Recommendations to Remove Firearms in Families Participating in a Clinical Trial for Adolescent Depression,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39, no. 10 (2000): 1220-1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Durkin, A., Wilmore, B., Sarnoff, C., and Hemenway, D., “Closing the Data Gap: The Role of the States in Ensuring Informed Solutions to Gun Violence,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48, no. 4, Suppl. (2020): 32-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Brent et al., supra note 15.Google Scholar
See Dobscha, S.K. et al., “Primary Care Clinician Responses to Positive Suicidal Ideation Risk Assessments in Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan,” General Hospital Psychiatry 36, no. 3 (2014): 310-317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Pallin, R. et al., “California Public Opinion on Health Professionals Talking with Patients About Firearms,” Health Affairs 38, no. 10 (2019): 1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Hedman, L.C. et al., “State Laws on Emergency Holds for Mental Health Stabilization,” Psychiatric Services 67 (2016): 529-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Jones, N. et al., “What Should be the Scope of Physicians' Roles in Responding to Gun Violence,” American Medical Association Journal of Ethics 20, no. 1 (2018): 84-90.Google Scholar
See, e.g., M.G.L. c. 123 § 36(B)(1).Google Scholar
See Shultz et al., supra note 8.Google Scholar
See Sjöstrand, M. et al., “Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38, no. 6 (2013): 710-724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See McLean, R.M. et al., “Firearm-Related Injury and Death in the United States: A Call to Action from the Nation's Leading Physician and Public Health Professional Organizations,” Annals of Internal Medicine (2019), available at <https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2748085/firearm-related-injury-death-united-states-call-action-from-nation> (last visited September 20, 2020). (last visited September 20, 2020).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=See+McLean,+R.M.+et+al.,+“Firearm-Related+Injury+and+Death+in+the+United+States:+A+Call+to+Action+from+the+Nation's+Leading+Physician+and+Public+Health+Professional+Organizations,”+Annals+of+Internal+Medicine+(2019),+available+at++(last+visited+September+20,+2020).>Google Scholar
American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 1.2.10 (2019).Google Scholar
Gani, F., Sakran, J.V., and Canner, J.K., “Emergency Department Visits for Firearm-Related Injuries in the United States, 2006-14,” Health Affairs 36, no. 10 (2017): 1729-1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), available at <https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars> (last visited September 20, 2020).+(last+visited+September+20,+2020).>Google Scholar