Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:41:37.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limited Liability and the Public's Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Lainie Rutkow  and
Stephen P. Teret
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Corporations, through their products and behaviors, exert a strong effect on the wellbeing of populations. Public health practitioners and academics have long recognized the harms associated with some corporations’ products. For example, firearms are associated with approximately 30,000 deaths in the United States each year1 and over 200,000 deaths globally. Motor vehicles are associated with about 40,000 deaths in the United States each year and over 1.2 million deaths globally. Tobacco products kill about 438,000 people each year in the United States5 and about 4.9 million people worldwide. In addition to producing unsafe or harmful products, some corporations behave in ways that negatively impact the public’s health, such as marketing alcohol to youth and other vulnerable populations. Given these observations, one can conclude that it is possible to quantify the public health impact of individual industries, such as firearms, motor vehicles, tobacco, and alcohol. Health professionals can then target these individual industries to prevent or lessen the harms they cause.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , Winter 2007 , pp. 599 - 608
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Webbased Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS),” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/> (last visited August 22, 2007).+(last+visited+August+22,+2007).>Google Scholar
Cukier, W. Sidel, V. W., The Global Gun Epidemic (Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Facts 2005, at 2.Google Scholar
Pan American Health Organization, “Deaths from Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents in Selected Countries of the Americas, 1985–2001, “ Epidemiological Bulletin 25, no. 1 (2004): 2–5.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Tobacco-Related Mortality,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/Factsheets/tobacco_related_mortality.htm> (last visited August 21, 2007).+(last+visited+August+21,+2007).>Google Scholar
World Health Organization, “An International Treaty for Tobacco Control,” available at <http://www.who.int/features/2003/08/en/> (last visited August 21, 2007).+(last+visited+August+21,+2007).>Google Scholar
Jernigan, D. H., Global Status Report: Alcohol and Young People, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2001, at 10–13.Google Scholar
Teret, S. P. Michaelis, A. P., “Litigating for Native American Health: The Liability of Alcoholic Beverage Makers and Distributors,” Journal of Public Health Policy 26, no. 2 (2005): 246–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Corporations and Health Watch, “Corporate Practices,” available at <http://www.corporationsandhealth.org> (last visited August 22, 2007).+(last+visited+August+22,+2007).>Google Scholar
By the term “legal fictions,” we mean that corporations are a creation of the law, and exist only because the law has authorized their existence.Google Scholar
Wiist, W. H., “Public Health and the Anticorporate Movement: Rationale and Recommendations,” American Journal of Public Health 96, no. 8 (2006): 1370–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakan, J., The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (New York: Free Press, 2004): at 37.Google Scholar
Hills, S. L., ed., Corporate Violence: Injury and Death for Profit (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987): At 190–91.Google Scholar
Hillman, R. W., “Limited Liability in Historical Perspective,” Washington and Lee Law Review 54 (Spring 1997): 615–27.Google Scholar
Rutledge, T. E., “Limited Liability (or Not): Reflections on the Holy Grail,” South Dakota Law Review 51, no. 3 (2006): 417–49, at 419–21.Google Scholar
Davis, K. B. Jr., “Once More, the Business Judgment Rule,” Wisconsin Law Review 2000, no. 3 (2000): 573–95.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Frank, N., “Murder in the Workplace,” in Hills, , ed., supra note 13, at 103–07.Google Scholar
Micklethwait, J. Wooldridge, A., The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea (New York: Modern Library, 2003) .Google Scholar
Id., at 17–21.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Bakan, , supra note 12, at 11–13.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at 158.Google Scholar
Id, at 37.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, S. M., “The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights,” UCLA Law Review 53 (February 2006): 601–36, at 625; Friedman, M., “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits,” New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.Google Scholar
E.g., Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich. 459, 507 (1919) (“A business corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the profit of the stockholders. The powers of the directors are to be employed for that end. The discretion of the directors is to be exercised in the choice of means to attain that end, and does not extend to a change in the end itself…”).Google Scholar
See Bakan, , supra note 12, at 37, 50.Google Scholar
Harwell Wells, C. A., “The Cycles of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Historical Retrospective for the Twenty-First Century,” University of Kansas Law Review 51, no. 1 (2002): 77–140.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Starbucks Corporation, Corporate Social Responsibility Fiscal 2006 Annual Report (Seattle: Starbucks Coffee Company, 2007): at 57.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Pfizer, , A Prescription for Access (New York: Pfizer, 2004) .Google Scholar
See Korten, D. C., When Corporations Rule the World (Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press, 2001): At 202–4.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Starbucks Corporation, supra note 29, at 10.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Ogilvy Public Relations Worldwide, “Expertise: Corporate Social Responsibility,” available at <http://www.ogil-vypr.com/expertise/corporate-social-responsibility.cfm> (last visited August 21, 2007).+(last+visited+August+21,+2007).>Google Scholar
Ventoruzzo, M., “‘Cost-Based’ and ‘Rules-Based’ Regulatory Competition: Markets for Corporate Charters in the U.S. and in the E.U.,” NYU Journal of Law & Business 3 (Fall 2006): 91–153.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, M. A., Corporations and Other Business Organizations (New York: Foundation Press, 2000): at 100.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Bakan, , supra note 12, at 8.Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I., “Limited Liability and Corporate Groups,” Journal of Corporation Law 11, no. 4 (1986): 573–631.Google Scholar
See Eisenberg, , supra note 35, at 203.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Moll, D. K., “Minority Oppression & the Limited Liability Company: Learning (or Not) from Close Corporation History,” Wake Forest Law Review 40, no. 3 (2005): 883–976, at 888.Google Scholar
See Blumberg, , supra note 38.Google Scholar
Id., at 575.Google Scholar
See Hillman, , supra note 14.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. Fischel, D. R., “Limited Liability and the Corporation,” University of Chicago Law Review 52, no. 1 (1985): 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Eisenberg, , supra note 35, at 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Bakan, , supra note 12, at 61.Google Scholar
Armstrong, G. L. et al. , “The Economics of Routine Childhood Hepatitis A Immunization in the United States: The Impact of Herd Immunity,” Pediatrics 119, no. 1 (2007): e22–e29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordis, L., Epidemiology (Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 2000): At 19–20.Google Scholar
Christiani, D. C. Woodin, M. A., “Urban and Transboundary Air Pollution,” in McCally, M., ed., Life Support: The Environment and Human Health (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002): 15–37.Google Scholar
See Eisenberg, , supra note 35, at 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Blumberg, , supra note 38, at 616.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. Kraakman, R., “Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts,” Yale Law Journal 100, no. 7 (1991): 1879–1934, at 1894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 1882–83.Google Scholar
Id.; see Blumberg, , supra note 38.Google Scholar
See Hansmann, Kraakman, , supra note 53, at 1907.Google Scholar
See Bakan, , supra note 12, at 22.Google Scholar
See Micklethwait, Wooldridge, , supra note 18, at 141.Google Scholar
Derber, C., Corporation Nation (New York: St. Martin's Griffin, 1998): at 168.Google Scholar
Id., at 43–48.Google Scholar
See Blumberg, , supra note 38, at 575–77.Google Scholar
Lopucki, L. M., “The Death of Liability,” Yale Law Journal 106, no. 1 (1996): 1–92, at 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See German Law on Pharmacies, § 7, quoted in Lafontaine, C., National Law on Pharmacies and its Non-Application by a Member State's Public Authorities (Saarbrucken, Germany: Law Web Saarbrucken, 2006): At 304, available at <http://www.jura.uni-saarland.de/projekte/Bibliothek/text.php?id=432> (last visited August 21, 2007).Google Scholar
Harris, E., “Germany Attempts to Update Pharmacy Laws,” Morning Edition, National Public Radio Programs, November 14, 2006.Google Scholar
See German Law on Pharmacies, § 8, quoted in Lafontaine, , supra note 63, at 304.Google Scholar
Cullen, A. Bauer, S., “Drug Chain Rattles Markets in Germany,” International Herald Tribune, April 17, 2007.Google Scholar
See Harris, , supra note 64.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., “Government Urges ECJ to Retain German Ban on Foreign Ownership of Pharmacies,” Global Insight, August 20, 2007.Google Scholar
Boston, W., “Pills + Politics,” Time, September 24, 2006; see Harris, , supra note 64.Google Scholar
See “Dow Corning at a Glance,” Dow Corning Web site, available at <http://www.dowcorning.com/content/about/> (last visited May 25, 2007).+(last+visited+May+25,+2007).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Blumberg, , supra note 38, at 575–77.Google Scholar
Bernstein, D. E., “The Breast Implant Fiasco,” California Law Review 87, no. 2 (1999): 457–510, at 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, B. J., “Dow Corning in Bankruptcy Over Lawsuits,” New York Times, May 16, 1995.Google Scholar
See Bernstein, , supra note 74, at 464.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Rose, N. R. Potter, M., “The Silicone Controversy: Towards a Resolution,” Immunology Today 16, no. 10 (1995): 459–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Feder, , supra note 75.Google Scholar
“Dow Corning Emerges from Bankruptcy,” New York Times, June 2, 2004.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Radaszewski v. Telecom Corp., 981 F.2d 305, 311 (8th Cir. 1992) (“The doctrine of limited liability is intended precisely to protect a parent corporation whose subsidiary goes broke.”)Google Scholar
See Blumberg, , supra note 38, at 575–77.Google Scholar
See Hansmann, Kraakman, , supra note 53, at 1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. B., “Piercing the Veil: Is the Common Law the Problem?” Connecticut Law Review 37 (Spring 2005): 619–34, at 619.Google Scholar
Krendl, C. S. Krendl, J. R., “Piercing the Corporate Veil: Focusing the Inquiry,” Denver Law Journal 55, no. 1 (1978): 1–60.Google Scholar
Berkey v. Third Avenue Railroad Co., 244 N.Y. 84 (1926).Google Scholar
Thompson, R. B., “Piercing the Corporate Veil: An Empirical Study,” Cornell Law Review 76 (July 1991): 1036–74.Google Scholar
524 U.S. 51 (1998).Google Scholar
Id., at 56.Google Scholar
Mendelson, N. A., “A Control-Based Approach to Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts,” Columbia Law Review 102, no. 5 (2002): 1203–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, B. C., “Clearing Away the Mist: Suggestions for Developing a Principled Veil Piercing Doctrine in China,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 39, no. 5 (2006): 1643–75.Google Scholar
Cooper, A., “Twenty-Eight Words That Could Change the World,” The Sun, September 2004, available at <http://www.thesunmagazine.org/345_Hinkley.pdf> (last visited August 21, 2007).Google Scholar