Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-5ws7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T11:54:19.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inmate Litigation, Legal Access, and Prison Privatization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2022

Anna Gunderson
Anna Gunderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Debates over prison privatization neglect to consider differences in legal access across private and public prisons. I argue that private prisons experience lower filing rates than public prisons, and that cases brought against publicly traded private prison companies are less likely to be dismissed and more likely to succeed than similar cases against public prisons. I find evidence consistent with these claims, a result that is not driven by other explanations of judicial decision-making. This paper has implications for skepticism of private interests in public policymaking, and encourages investigation of access to justice for inmates in public and private custody.

Keywords

private prisonsinmate litigationjudicial politicsjudicial ideology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , October 2023 , pp. 256 - 276
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderstein, David M. 2001. “In Need of Correction: The Iron Triangle of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.” Columbia Law Review 101: 1681.Google Scholar
Austin, James and Coventry, Garry. 2001. “Emerging Issues on Privatized Prisons.” https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=181249.Google Scholar
Bauer, Shane. 2019. American prison: A reporter’s undercover journey into the business of punishment. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bayer, Patrick and Pozen, David E. 2005. “The Effectiveness of Juvenile Correctional Facilities: Public Versus Private Management.” The Journal of Law and Economics 48 (2): 549–589.Google Scholar
Blakely, Curtis R. and Bumphus, Vic W.. 2005. “An Analysis of Civil Suits Filed Against Private and Public Prisons: A Comparison of Title 42: Section 1983 Litigation.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 16 (1): 74–87.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam and Sen, Maya. 2017. “A Common-Space Scaling of the American Judiciary and Legal Profession.” Political Analysis 25 (1): 114–121.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2015. “Litigant Status and Trial Court Appeal Mobilization.” Law & Policy 37 (4): 294–323.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2016. “Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 788–799.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina L., Epstein, Lee and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 389–411.Google Scholar
Brill, Alison. 2008. “Rights without Remedy: The Myth of State Court Accessibility after the Prison Litigation Reform Act.” Cardozo Law Review 30: 645–682.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Brett C. and Jones, Alisha. 2016. “Judicial Intervention into Prisons: Comparing Private and Public Prisons from 1990 to 2005.” Justice System Journal 1: 39–52.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty and Jenness, Valerie. 2013. “Inside the Pyramid of Disputes: Naming Problems and Filing Grievances in California Prisons.” Social Problems 60 (1): 50–80.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty and Jenness, Valerie. 2015. Appealing to Justice: Prisoner Grievances, Rights, and Carceral Logic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Scott D., Gaes, Gerald G., Klein-Saffran, Jody, Daggett, Dawn M. and Saylor, William G.. 2002. “Using Inmate Survey Data in Assessing Prison Performance: A Case Study Comparing Private and Public Prisons.” Criminal Justice Review 27 (1): 26–51.Google Scholar
Carson, Ann E. 2020. “Prisoners in 2018.” https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/p18.pdf.Google Scholar
Casillas, Christopher J., Enns, Peter K. and Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1): 74–88.Google Scholar
Cheesman, Fred, Hanson, Roger and Ostrom, Brian. 2000. “A Tale of Two Laws: The U.S. Congress Confronts Habeas Corpus Petitions And Section 1983 Lawsuits.” Law & Policy 22 (2): 89–113.Google Scholar
Clair, Matthew and Winter, Alix S. 2016. “How Judges Think About Racial Disparities: Situational Decision-making in the Criminal Justice System.” Criminology 54 (2): 332–359.Google Scholar
Clark, Tom S. and Lauderdale, Benjamin. 2010. “Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 871–890.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alma and Yang, Crystal S.. 2019. “Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11 (1): 160–91.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ben, Liebling, Alison and Hulley, Susie. 2015. “Staff-prisoner Relationships, Staff Professionalism, and the Use of Authority in Public- and Private-sector Prisons.” Law & Social Inquiry 40 (2): 309–344.Google Scholar
Dumas, Tao L. and Haynie, Stacia L.. 2012. “Building an Integrated Model of Trial Court Decision Making: Predicting Plaintiff Success and Awards across Circuits.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (2): 103–126.Google Scholar
Dunworth, Terence and Rogers, Joel. 1996. “Corporations in Court: Big Business Litigation in US Federal Courts, 1971–1991.” Law & Social Inquiry 21 (3): 497–592.Google Scholar
Eisen, Lauren-Brooke. 2017. “Private Prisons Lock Up Thousands of Americans With Almost No Oversight.” http://time.com/5013760/american-private-prisons-donald-trump/.Google Scholar
Eisen, Lauren-Brooke. 2018. Inside Private Prisons: An American Dilemma in the Age of Mass Incarceration. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore. 1988. “Litigation Models and Trial Outcomes in Civil Rights and Prisoner Cases.” The Georgetown Law Journal 77: 1567–1602.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore and Schlanger, Margo. 2003. “The Reliability of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts Database: An Initial Empirical Analysis.” Notre Dame Law Review (78): 1455–1496.Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K. and Ramirez, Mark D.. 2018. “Privatizing Punishment: Testing Theories of Public Support for Private Prison and Immigration Detention Facilities.” Criminology 56 (3): 546–573.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court? Possibly Yes (But We’re Not Sure Why).” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 13: 263.Google Scholar
Farole, Donald J. Jr. 1999. “Reexamining Litigant Success in State Supreme Sourts.” Law & Society Review 33: 1043.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jody. 2000. “The Private Role in the Public Governance.” New York University Law Review 75: 543.Google Scholar
Frost, Natasha A., Trapassi, Jessica and Heinz, Steven. 2019. “Public Opinion and Correctional Privatization.” Criminology & Public Policy 18 (2): 457–476.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why The “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations On The Limits Of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Blackstone, Bethany and Vining, Richard L. Jr. 2008. “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 293–306.Google Scholar
Gilmour, Robert S. and Jensen, Laura S.. 1998. “Reinventing Government Accountability: Public Functions, Privatization, and the Meaning of “State Action".” Public Administration Review 58 (3): 247–258.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Anna. 2020. “Why Do States Privatize their Prisons? The Unintended Consequences of Inmate Litigation.” Perspectives on Politics 20 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Gunderson, Anna. 2021. “Ideology, Disadvantage, and Federal District Court Inmate Civil Rights Filings: The Troubling Effects of Pro Se Status.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 18 (3): 603–628.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K. 2004. “Where Have All the Trials Gone? Settlements, Nontrial Adjudications, and Statistical Artifacts in the Changing Disposition of Federal Civil Cases.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (3): 705–734.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver, Shleifer, Andrei and Vishny, Robert W.. 1997. “The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 4: 1127–1161.Google Scholar
Hübert, Ryan and Copus, Ryan. 2019. “The Hidden Effects of Judge Ideology in Federal District Courts.” SPSA Conference (Austin TX) and Conference on Institutions and Law-Making (Emory University), APSA Conference (Washington DC).Google Scholar
Iacus, Stefano M., King, Gary and Porro, Giuseppe. 2012. “Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching.” Political Analysis 20 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ben and Strother, Logan. 2021. “TRENDS: The Supreme Court’s (Surprising?) Indifference to Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (1): 18–34.Google Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2020. “Race, Context, and Judging on the Courts of Appeals: Race-Based Panel Effects in Death Penalty Cases.” Justice System Journal 42 (3–4): 1–22.Google Scholar
Lauderdale, Benjamin E. and Clark, Tom S.. 2014. “Scaling Politically Meaningful Dimensions Using Texts and Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 754–771.Google Scholar
Lukemeyer, Anna and McCorkle, Richard C.. 2006. “Privatization of Prisons: Impact on Prison Conditions.” The American Review of Public Administration 36 (2): 189–206.Google Scholar
Makarios, Matthew D. and Maahs, Jeff. 2012. “Is Private Time Quality Time? A National Private-Public Comparison of Prison Quality.” The Prison Journal 92 (3): 336–357.Google Scholar
Metzger, Gillian E. 2003. “Privatization as Delegation.” Columbia Law Review 103: 1367.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Anita. 2021. “Impacts of Private Prison Contracting on Inmate Time Served and Recidivism.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 13 (2): 408–438.Google Scholar
Palacios, Jazmin E., Butler, H. Daniel and Griffin, O. Hayden III. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Section 1983 Lawsuits Filed by Texas Inmates.” Corrections 7 (3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Perrone, Dina and Pratt, Travis C.. 2003. “Comparing the Quality of Confinement and Cost-Effectiveness of Public versus Private Prisons: What We Know, Why We Do Not Know More, and Where to Go from Here.” Prison Journal 83: 301–322.Google Scholar
Piehl, Anne Morrison and Schlanger, Margo. 2004. “Determinants of Civil Rights Filings in Federal District Court by Jail and Prison Inmates.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1 (1): 79–109.Google Scholar
Pratt, Travis C. and Maahs, Jeff. 1999. “Are Private Prisons More Cost-Effective Than Public Prisons? A Meta-Analysis of Evaluation Research Studies.” Crime & Delinquency 45 (3): 358–371.Google Scholar
Raher, Stephen. 2010. “The Business of Punishing: Impediments to Accountability in the Private Corrections Industry.” Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest 8: 209–249.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Mark D. 2020. “Understanding Public Blame Attributions When Private Contractors Are Responsible for Civilian Casualties.” Policy Sciences 54: 21–40.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Mark D. and Lewis, Paul G.. 2018. “Beliefs About Corporate America and the Structure of Opinions Toward Privatization.” Political Behavior 40 (4): 1011–1034.Google Scholar
Rios, Victor M, Carney, Nikita and Kelekay, Jasmine. 2017. “Ethnographies of Race, Crime, and Justice: Toward a Sociological Double-consciousness.” Annual Review of Sociology 43: 493–513.Google Scholar
Schanzenbach, Max. 2005. “Racial and Sex Disparities in Prison Sentences: The Effect of District-Level Judicial Demographics.” The Journal of Legal Studies 34 (1): 57–92.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo. 2003. “Inmate Litigation.” Harvard Law Review 116 (6): 1555–1706.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo. 2006. “Civil Rights Injunctions Over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders.” New York University Law Review 2: 550–630.Google Scholar
Schlanger, Margo. 2015. “Trends in Prisoner Litigation, as the PLRA Enters Adulthood.” UC Irvine Law Review 5: 153–178.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, Maya and Wasow, Omar. 2016. “Race as a Bundle of Sticks: Designs that Estimate Effects of Seemingly Immutable Characteristics.” Annual Review of Political Science 19: 499–522.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Reginald S., Mishler, William and Songer, Donald R.. 1992. “Ideology, Status, and the Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court.” The American Political Science Review 86 (2): 464–471.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Sheehan, Reginald S. and Haire, Susan Brodie. 1999. “Do the Haves Come Out Ahead Over Time-Applying Galanter’s Framework to Decisions of the US Courts of Appeals, 1925-1988.” Law & Society Review 33: 811.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R. and Haire, Susan. 1992. “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (4): 963–982.Google Scholar
Spivak, Andrew L. and Sharp, Susan F.. 2008. “Inmate Recidivism as a Measure of Private Prison Performance.” Crime & Delinquency 54 (3): 482–508.Google Scholar
Struve, Catherine T. 2018. “The Federal Rules of Inmate Appeals.” Arizona State Law Journal 50: 247–315.Google Scholar
Tartaglia, Mike. 2014. “Private Prisons, Private Records.” Boston University Law Review 94: 1689–1744.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jim. 1988. Prisoner Litigation: The Paradox of the Jailhouse Lawyer. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Thompson, Lyke and Elling, Richard C.. 2002. “Mapping Patterns of Support for Privatization in the Mass Public: The Case of Michigan.” Public Administration Review 4: 338–348.Google Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T and Kramer, John H. 1996. “Court Communities Under Sentencing Guidelines: Dilemmas of Formal Rationality and Sentencing Disparity.” Criminology 34 (3): 383–408.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice. 2016a. “Audit of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Contract with CoreCivic, Inc. to Operate the Adams County Correctional Center in Natchez, Mississippi.” https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2016/a1708.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice. 2016b. “Review of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Monitoring of Contract Prisons.” https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2016/e1606.pdf.Google Scholar
Volokh, Alexander. 2013. “The Modest Effect of Minneci v. Pollard on Inmate Litigants.” Akron Law Review 46 (2): 287–329.Google Scholar
Volokh, Alexander. 2014. “The New Private-Regulation Skepticism: Due Process, Non-Delegation, and Antitrust Challenges.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 37: 931.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Lïoc. 2002. “The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration.” Ethnography 3 (4): 371–397.Google Scholar
Wecht, David N. 1987. “Breaking the Code of Deference: Judicial Review of Private Prisons.” The Yale Law Journal 96 (4): 815–837.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Gunderson supplementary material

Appendix

Download Gunderson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 58.9 KB