Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:09:52.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sphenoid Sinus: Present Day Value of Surgical Procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

Ross Hall Skillern
Ross Hall Skillern
Affiliation:
Philadelphia, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology, Rhinology, and Otology , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , February 1917 , pp. 52 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1917

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Schaffer, .—“Uber acute u. chron. Erkrankung. de. Keilbeinhöhle,” Deutsch. med. Wochenschr., S. 1062, 1892.Google Scholar
(2) Spiess, .—“Zur chirurgie d. Sinus Sphenoidalis,” Arch. f. Laryng., Bd. 7, S. 145, 1897.Google Scholar
(3) Grünwald, .—“Die Lehre d. Naseneiterungen,” 1896.Google Scholar
(4) Andrews, Knives.—“Müller's Instrument Catalogue.Google Scholar
(5) Grayson, .—“The Exploratory Opening of the Sphenoid Sinus,” Laryngoscope, p. 65, 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Hajek, .—“Zur Diagnose u. intranasalen chirurgischen Behandlung der Eiterungen der Keilbeinhöhle,” Arch. f. laryng., Bd. 16, S. 105, 1904.Google Scholar
(7) Casselberry, .–“Attenuated types of Suppurative Sphenoiditis in Relation to so-called Post-nasal Catarrh, etc.,” Journ. Ophth. and Oto-Laryng., p. 210, 1913.Google Scholar
(8) Rhese, .—“Ueber Keilbeinhöhlenmukozele,” Zeitsch. f. Ohrenhk., Bd 64, S. 169, 1911–1912.Google Scholar
(9) Benjamins, .—“Mucocele des Sinus Sphenoidalis,” Archiv. f. Laryng., Bd. 24, S. 353, 1911.Google Scholar
(10) Killian, .—“Ueber d. Therapie d. Entzündung. d. Siebeinzellen u.d. Keilbeinhöhle,” Vers. d. deutsch. Otol. Gesellsch., 1900.Google Scholar
(11) Hinkel, .—“Symptoms and Treatment of Sphenoidal Sinusitis,” Trans. Am. laryng. Assoc., p. 93, 1902.Google Scholar
(12) Mosher, .—“The Applied Anatomy of the Intra-nasal Surgery of the Ethmoidal Labyrinth,” Trans. Am. Laryng. Assoc., p. 25, 1912.Google Scholar
(13) Coakley, .—“Diseases of the Nost and Throat.”Google Scholar
(14) Curtis, .—“Modern Methods of Acessory Sinus Treatment,” Laryngoscope, 05, 1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Mosher, .—“Personal Communication” (not, however, in Mosher's hands).Google Scholar
(16) Hajek, .—“Nebenhöhlen der Nase,” 1898.Google Scholar
(17) Tilley, .—“The Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Chronic Suppuration in the Sphenoidal Sinus,” Brit. Med. Journ., vol. ii, p. 1198, 1905.Google Scholar
(18) Onódi, and Rosenberg, .—“Die Behandlung der Krankheiten der Nase,” S. 356, 1906.Google Scholar
(19) Boenninghaus, .—“Handbuch der Speziellen Chirurgie des Ohres, etc.” Bd. 3, S. 209, 1913.Google Scholar
(20) Emerson, .—“Report of a Fatal Operative Case showing Developmental Absence of the Outer Sphenoidal Wall and in its place a large Vein communicating directly with the Carvernous Sinus,” Laryngoscope, p. 43, 1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21) Ingals, .—“Discussion,” Trans. Am. Laryng. Assoc., p. 91, 1905.Google Scholar
(22) Spiess, .—“Zur Chirurgie des Sinus Sphenoidalis,” Arch. f. Laryng., Bd. 7, S. 134, 1897.Google Scholar
(23) Stacke, .—Ueber d. Verwendbarkeit d. Elektromotors bei Operationen, etc., Arch. f. Ohrenhk., 1897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24) Stoeckel, .—“Die Breite endo-nasale Eröffnung d. Keilbeinhöhle mit. d. Fraise,” Arch. f. Laryng., Bd. 17, S. 496, 1905.Google Scholar
(25) Halle, .—“Die Intranasalen Operationen bei eitrigen Erkrakungen der Nebenhöhlen der Nase,” Arch. f. Laryng., S. 105, 1914.Google Scholar
(26) Zarniko, .—“Die Krankheiten der Nase, etc.,” S. 691, 1910.Google Scholar
(27) Gmeinder, .—“Instrument Catalogue of H. Pfau,” Berlin.Google Scholar
(28) Holms, .—“The Sphenoidal Cavity and its Relation to the Eye,” Arch. of Ophthal., vol. xxv, p. 460, 1896.Google Scholar
(29) Onódi, .—“Das Verhältnis des Nervus Optikus zu der Keilbeinhöhle, etc.,” Arch. f. Laryng., Bd. 14. S. 360, 1903.Google Scholar
(30) Loeb, .—“Study of the Anatomic Relations of the Optic Nerve to the Acessory Sinuses,” Ann. of Otol., 06, 1909.Google Scholar
(31) Meyer, .—“Sinister Unrecorded Anomalies of the Sphenoid,” Ann. of Otol., June, p. 257, 1915.Google Scholar
(32) Prentiss, .—“Some Variations in Sphenoid Sinus,” Journ. Iowa State Med. Soc., p. 263, 1915.Google Scholar
(33) Skillern, .—“The Present Status of the Radical Operation for Empyema of the Sphenoidal Sinus,” Journ. Am. Med. Assoc., 12 19th, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(34) Luc, .—“Lecons sur les Suppurations de L'Oreille, etc.,” p. 369, 1910.Google Scholar
(35) Instrument Catalogue, Fergusons, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
(36) Glas, .—“Rhinorrhoea Cerebro-spinalis,” Wien. Laryng. Gesell. Cent. f. Laryn., S. 154, 1904.Google Scholar
(37) Decherd, H. B..—“Personal Communication.”Google Scholar
(38) Curtis, .—“The Sphenoidal Sinus (Case),” Laryngoscope, p. 866, 1904.Google Scholar
(39) Hajek, .—“Fall von Empyem der Keilbeinhöhle mit bedrochlichen Stan-ungserscheinungen,” Wein. Med. Wocheuschr., No. 32, 33, 1895.Google Scholar
(40) —Myles, .—“Trephining and Curettage of the Sphenoidal Sinus. Profuse Secondary Hæmorrhage requiring L:igation of the External Carotid,” Laryngoscope, p. 293, 1903.Google Scholar
(41) Hajek, .—“Experineces in the Endonasal Radical Operation upon the Sphenoid Cavity, etc.,”. Ann. of Otol., 03, 1909.Google Scholar
(42) Hinkel, .—“Symptoms and Treatment of Chronic Empyema of the Sphenoidal Sinus,” Laryngoscope, p. 736, 1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(43) Gleitsmann, .—“Discussion,” Trans. Am. Laryng. Soc., p. 91, 1895.Google Scholar
(44) Hepburn, .—.“Discussion,” Trans. Am. Lryng., Rhin., and Otol. Soc., p. 68, 1901.Google Scholar
(45) Hajek, .—“Nebenhöhlen der Nase,” S. 379, 1915.Google Scholar
(46) Boenninghaus, .—“Handbuch der Speziellen Chirurugie, etc.,” Bd. 3, S. 212, 1913.Google Scholar
(47) Skillern, .–“Ein Fall von Geschlossenen Empyem, etc.,” Zeitschr. f. Laryng., Bd. 1, S. 337, 1909.Google Scholar
(48) Solengerger, .—“Sphenoid Disease with Brain Symptoms,” Colorado Med., 09, 1914.Google Scholar
(49) StClair, Thomson.—“Cerebral and Ophthalmic Complications in Sphenoidal Sinusitis,” Brit. med. Journ., vol. ii, p. 768, 1906.Google Scholar
(50) Kander, .—“Meningits beim Keilbeinhöhlenempyem mit Ausgang in Heilung.,” Verin Süddeutsch. Laryng., S. 109, 1907.Google Scholar
(51) Avellis, .—“Ortliche seröse Meningitis bei akuter Keilbeineiterung, etc.,” Verein Süddeutsch Laryng., S. 116, 1907.Google Scholar
(52) Fraser, and Vérel, .—“An Analysis of Seventy-six Consecutive Operations on the Frontal, Maxillary, Ethmoidal, and Sphenoidal Sinuses,” Journ. of Laryng., p. 69, 1913.Google Scholar
(53) Brophy, .—“Report of Three Cases of Monocular Blindness due to Sinns Obstruction, with Recovery to Vision,” Opthalmic Record, p. 351, 1915.Google Scholar
(54) Stark, .—“Sudden Blindness due to Suppuration of the Accessory Nasal Sinuses,” Journ. Am. Med. Assoc., 10 30, 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar