Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:37:22.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reliability of perceptions of voice quality: evidence from a problem asthma clinic population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2009

C Sellars ,
A E Stanton ,
A McConnachie ,
C P Dunnet ,
L M Chapman ,
C E Bucknall  and
K MacKenzie
C Sellars*
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK
A E Stanton
Affiliation:
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK Osler Chest Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
A McConnachie
Affiliation:
Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
C P Dunnet
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK
L M Chapman
Affiliation:
Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK
C E Bucknall
Affiliation:
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK
K MacKenzie
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Cameron Sellars, Dept of Speech and Language Therapy, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Castle St, Glasgow G4 0SF, Scotland, UK. Fax: +44 (0)141 211 4821 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Methods of perceptual voice evaluation have yet to achieve satisfactory consistency; complete acceptance of a recognised clinical protocol is still some way off.

Materials and methods:

Three speech and language therapists rated the voices of 43 patients attending the problem asthma clinic of a teaching hospital, according to the grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenicity-strain (GRBAS) scale and other perceptual categories.

Results and analysis:

Use of the GRBAS scale achieved only a 64.7 per cent inter-rater reliability and a 69.6 per cent intra-rater reliability for the grade component. One rater achieved a higher degree of consistency. Improved concordance on the GRBAS scale was observed for subjects with laryngeal abnormalities. Raters failed to reach any useful level of agreement in the other categories employed, except for perceived gender.

Discussion:

These results should sound a note of caution regarding routine adoption of the GRBAS scale for characterising voice quality for clinical purposes. The importance of training and the use of perceptual anchors for reliable perceptual rating need to be further investigated.

Keywords

AsthmaReproducibility of ResultsVoice Quality
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 7 , July 2009 , pp. 755 - 763
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Blood, GW, Mahan, BW, Hyman, M. Judging personality and appearance from voice disorders. J Commun Disord 1979;12:63–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 DeGregorio, NJ, Polow, NG. Effect of teacher training sessions on listener perception of voice disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1985;16:25–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Lallh, AK, Rochet, AP. The effect of information on listeners' attitudes toward speakers with voice or resonance disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:782–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Lass, NJ, Ruscello, DM, Bradshaw, KH, Blankenship, BL. Adolescents' perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children. J Commun Disord 1991;24:267–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Ruscello, DM, Lass, NJ, Podbesek, J. Listeners' perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children. Folia Phoniatr 1988;40:290–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Davis, CN, Harris, TB. Teachers' ability to accurately identify disordered voices. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 1992;23:136–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Bonet, M, Casan, P. Evaluation of dysphonia in a children's choir. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1994;46:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Behrman, A. Common practices of voice therapists in the evaluation of patients. J Voice 2005;19:454–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Bhuta, T, Patrick, L, Garnett, JD. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. J Voice 2004;18:299–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Carding, P, Carlson, E, Epstein, R, Mathieson, L, Shewell, C. Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2000;25:133–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Eadie, TL, Doyle, PC. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. J Voice 2005;19:1–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Speyer, R, Wieneke, GH, Dejonckere, PH. Documentation of progress in voice therapy: perceptual, acoustic, and laryngostroboscopic findings pretherapy and posttherapy. J Voice 2004;18:325–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Webb, AL, Carding, PN, Deary, IJ, MacKenzie, K, Steen, N, Wilson, JA. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:429–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Kreiman, J, Gerratt, BR, Precoda, K, Berke, GS. Individual differences in voice quality perception. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:512–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Muñoz, J, Mendoza, E, Fresneda, MD, Carballo, G, Lopez, P. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2003;55:102–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Kreiman, J, Gerratt, BR. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;108:1867–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Hirano, M. Clinical Examination of Voice, 1st edn. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1981Google Scholar
18 De Bodt, MS, Van de Heyning, PH, Wuyts, FL, Lambrechts, L. The perceptual evaluation of voice disorders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1996;50:283–91Google ScholarPubMed
19 De Bodt, MS, Wuyts, FL, Van de Heyning, PH, Croux, C. Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice 1997;11:74–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Dejonckere, PH, Obbens, C, de Moor, GM, Wieneke, GH. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1993;45:76–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Dejonckere, PH, Remacle, M, Fresnel-Elbaz, E, Woisard, V, Crevier-Buchman, L, Millet, B. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1996;117:219–24Google ScholarPubMed
22 Millet, B, Dejonckere, PH. What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatr Logop 1998;50:305–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Karnell, MP, Melton, SD, Childes, JM, Coleman, TC, Dailey, SA, Hoffman, HT. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. J Voice 2007;21:576–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Piccirillo, JF, Painter, C, Haiduk, A, Fuller, D, Fredrickson, JM. Assessment of two objective voice function indices. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:396–400CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Lee, M, Drinnan, M, Carding, P. The reliability and validity of patient self-rating of their own voice quality. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2005;30:357–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Ma, EP, Yiu, EM. Multiparametric evaluation of dysphonic severity. J Voice 2006;20:380–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27 Murry, T, Medrado, R, Hogikyan, ND, Aviv, JE. The relationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of life measures. J Voice 2004;18:183–192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28 Baker, BM, Baker, CD, Le, HT. Vocal quality, articulation and audiological characteristics of children and young adults with diagnosed allergies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91:277–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29 Barnes, P. Corticosteroids. In: O'Byrne, PM, Thomson, NC, eds. Manual of Asthma Management. London: WB Saunders, 2000;173–96Google Scholar
30 Williamson, IJ, Matusiewicz, SP, Brown, PH, Greening, AP, Crompton, GK. Frequency of voice problems and cough in patients using pressurized aerosol inhaled steroid preparations. Eur Respir J 1995;8:590–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Crompton, GK, Sanderson, R, Dewar, MH, Matusiewicz, SP, Ning, AC, Jamieson, AH et al. Comparison of pulmicort pMDI plus nebuhaler and pulmicort turbuhaler in asthmatic patients with dysphonia. Respir Med 2000;94:448–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Dogan, M, Eryuksel, E, Kocak, I, Celikel, T, Sehitoglu, MA. Subjective and objective evaluation of voice quality in patients with asthma. J Voice 2007;21:224–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Gallivan, GJ, Gallivan, KH, Gallivan, HK. Inhaled corticosteroids: hazardous effects on voice – an update. J Voice 2007;21:101–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Lavy, JA, Wood, G, Rubin, JS, Harries, M. Dysphonia associated with inhaled steroids. J Voice 2000;14:581–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35 Stanton, AE, Johnson, MK, Carter, R, MacKenzie, K, Bucknall, CE. Physiological evaluation of the upper airway in a problem asthma clinic. Eur Respir J 2004;24:P1712 http://www.ers-education.org/lr/abstract.aspx?idMedia=18512. Viewed 6/01/09Google Scholar
36 Stanton, AE, MacKenzie, K, Carter, R, Bucknall, CE. The spectrum of upper airway problems in a problem asthma clinic – the role of the larynx. Eur Respir J 2004;24:P1711 http://www.ers-education.org/lr/abstract.aspx?idMedia=18511. Viewed 6/01/09Google Scholar
37 Stanton, AE, McGarry, GW, Carter, R, Bucknall, CE. The spectrum of upper airway problems in a problem asthma clinic – the role of the nose. Eur Respir J 2004;24:1710 http://www.ers-education.org/lr/abstract.aspx?idMedia=18510. Viewed 6/01/09Google Scholar
38 Stanton, AE, Sellars, C, MacKenzie, K, McConnachie, A, Bucknall, CE. Perceived vocal morbidity in a problem asthma clinic. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39 Wilson, JA, Webb, A, Carding, PN, Steen, IN, MacKenzie, K, Deary, IJ. The voice symptom scale (VoiSS) and the vocal handicap index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:169–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Fairbanks, G. Voice and Articulation Drillbook, 2nd edn. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960Google Scholar
41 Dejonckere, PH, Remacle, M, Fresnel-Elbaz, E, Woisard, V, Crevier, L, Millet, B. Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1998;119:247–8Google ScholarPubMed
42 Gleser, GC, Cronbach, LJ, Rajaratnam, N. Generalizability of scores influences by multiple sources of variance. Psychometrika 1965;30:395–418CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Efron, B, Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44 Dedivitis, RA, Barros, AP, Queija, DS, Alexandre, JCM, Rezende, WTM, Crazza, VR et al. Interobserver perceptual analysis of smoker's voice. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:124–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45 Carding, P, Carlson, E, Epstein, R, Mathieson, L, Shewell, C. Re: evaluation of voice quality. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2001;36:127–34Google ScholarPubMed
46 Dejonckere, PH. Perceptual and laboratory assessment of dysphonia. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000;33:731–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47 Leslie, P, Drinnan, MJ, Finn, P, Ford, GA, Wilson, JA. Reliability and validity of cervical auscultation: a controlled comparison using videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia 2004;19:231–40Google ScholarPubMed
48 Stroud, AE, Lawrie, BW, Wiles, CM. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of cervical auscultation to detect aspiration in patients with dysphagia. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:640–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49 Wolfe, VI, Martin, DP, Palmer, CI. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000;43:697–705CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50 Eadie, TL, Baylor, CR. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice. J Voice 2006;20:527–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51 Awan, SN, Lawson, LL. The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings. J Voice 2008 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/08921997. Viewed 16/10/08Google ScholarPubMed
52 Pribuisiene, R, Uloza, V, Kupcinskas, L, Jonaitis, L. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients. J Voice 2006;20:128–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53 Bele, IV. Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality. J Voice 2005;19:555–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54 Chan, KMK, Yiu, EM. A comparison of two perceptual voice evaluation training programs for naive listeners. J Voice 2006;20:229–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55 Kreiman, J, Gerratt, B. Measuring vocal quality. In: Kent, RD, Ball, MJ, eds. Voice Quality Measurement, 1st edn. San Diego: Singular, 2000:73–101Google Scholar
56 Shrivastav, R, Sapienza, CM, Nandur, V. Application of psychometric theory to the measurement of voice quality using rating scales. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:323–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57 Shrivastav, R. The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality. J Voice 2003;17:502–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58 Shrivastav, R. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception. J Voice 2006;20:211–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59 Zraick, RI, Wendel, K, Smith-Olinde, L. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice. J Voice 2005;19:574–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60 Behrman, A, Sulica, L, He, T. Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1693–700CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61 Behrman, A. Evidence-based treatment of paralytic dysphonia: making sense of outcomes and efficacy data. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2004;37:75–104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62 Deary, IJ, Wilson, JA, Carding, PN, Mackenzie, K. The dysphonic voice heard by me, you and it: differential associations with personality and psychological distress. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003;28:374–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed