Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:52:33.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observational study of bone-anchored hearing aid infection rates using different post-operative dressings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2006

J Doshi
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
Y Karagama
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
D Buckley
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
I Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK

Abstract

Introduction: Avoidance of infection at the implant site is a crucial element to the success of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implantation. However, little evidence exists to suggest the best post-operative wound dressing to use.

Material and methods: We report our experience with 160 consecutive BAHA patients, using four types of post-operative BAHA wound dressing (Tri-adcortyl®, Mepitel®, Allevyn®, and Acticoat 7® with Allevyn). Patients were reviewed at week one and week two post-operatively. Infection was defined as a positive wound swab culture or evidence of cellulitis at the BAHA site.

Results: Post-operative BAHA infection rates were 16 per cent, 50 per cent, 10 per cent and 5 per cent, for each of the four dressings respectively, and the mean number of additional visits to wound care clinic were 1.5, 3.7, one and 0.4, respectively.

Discussion: Acticoat 7 with Allevyn produced the lowest infection rate and thus became the dressing of choice for our BAHA programme.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
2006 JLO (1984) Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)