Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T22:24:55.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Endoscopic control of posterior epistaxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Samy Elwany  and
Hesham Abdel-Fatah
Samy Elwany*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria Medical School, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hesham Abdel-Fatah
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Alexandria Medical School, Alexandria, Egypt.
*
Address for correspondence: Samy Elwany, M.D., P.O. Box 267, Sidi Gaber, Alexandria, Egypt.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Control of bleeding vessels by suction cautery under endoscopic vision was used on 38 patients suffering from posterior epistaxis. Twelve patients also required the insertion of nasal tampons at the end of the cautery procedure. Eight patients, six of them hypertensive, had recurrent epistaxis post-operatively. Five patients needed further cautery in order to control the bleeding. Three patients required temporary balloon tamponade, and a single patient had internal maxillary ligation. Temporary palatal numbness in three patients was the only post-operative complication. Otherwise, the technique has the potential advantages of simplicity, safety, effectiveness and simplified post-operative care.

Keywords

EpistaxisEndoscopy
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Issue 5 , May 1996 , pp. 432 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. O., Shannon, D. N., Schaefer, S. D., Raney, L. A. (1984) A surgical alternative to internal maxillary artery ligation for posterior epistaxis. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 92: 427–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bharadwaj, F. K., Novotny, O. M. (1986) Greater palatine canal injection: An alternative to the posterior nasal packing and arterial ligation in epistaxis. Journal of Otolaryngology 15: 94–99.Google Scholar
Caissisi, N. J., Biller, H. F., Ogura, J. H. (1971) Changes in arterial oxygen tension and pulmonary mechanics with the use of posterior packing in epistaxis: a preliminary report. Laryngoscope 81: 1261–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J. R., Serrins, A. J. (1965) Transantral ligation of the internal maxillary artery for epistaxis. Laryngoscope 75: 1151–1159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elwany, S., Tarek, K., Mekhamer, A. (1986) Pneumatic nasal catheters: advantages and drawbacks. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 100: 641–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairbanks, D. N. F. (1986) Complications of nasal packing. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 94: 412–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hara, M. J. (1962) Severe epistaxis. Archives of Otolaryngology 75: 258–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, J. N., Norris, J. W. (1983) Office treatment by cryotherapy for severe posterior nasal epistaxis-update. Laryngoscope 93: 876–879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, S. W., Baired, I. M., Frazier, R. D. (1982) Toxic shock syndrome following submucous resection and rhinoplasty. Journal of the American Medical Association 247: 2402–2403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wyck, L., Vinuela, F., Heeneman, H. (1982) Therapeutic embolization in the treatment of severe epistaxis. Journal of Otolaryngology 11: 271–274.Google ScholarPubMed
Weingarten, C. Z. (1973) Injection of the pterygopalatine fossa with glycerin. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology 76: 932–937.Google Scholar
Wetmore, S. J., Scrima, L., Hiller, F. C. (1988) Sleep apnea in epistaxis patients treated with nasal packs. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 98: 596–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed