Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:24:21.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multi-modal hearing: the fundamental importance of the kinociliary servo mechanism and the folly of psychoacoustics

Part III. Psychologists try to capture the unknowable in a net of mathematical equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

A. Tumarkin
A. Tumarkin*
Affiliation:
Liverpool
*
Ty Hwnt I'r AfonRhosygwaliau Bala, Gwynedd, LL23 7ES
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 98 , Issue 8 , August 1984 , pp. 747 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bunen, T. J. F. (1974) Phase effects in a three component signal. Journal ofthe Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 55: 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, E. (1956) On the Residue in Hearing. Ac. thesis Amsterdam.Google Scholar
De Boer, E. (1977) Pitch theories unified. In Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. Academic Press. 323–335.Google Scholar
Corless, R., and Winzer, H. (1964) Loudness of complex sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38:424–28.Google Scholar
Faber, A. (1929) Z. Morph Okol Thiere, 13: 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, H. VON (1976) Uber elle Wahrnehmbarkert van phasen anderungen. Acoustical, 35: 202–209.Google Scholar
Fletcher, H. (1929) Speech and Hearing. Macmillan & Co., London.Google Scholar
Fowler, E. P. (1936) Loudness Recruitment. A rchives of Otolaryngology, 24: 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. (1927) The Ego and the Id., London.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. L. (1973) Processor Theory for central formation of Pitch of complex Tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54: 1496–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
H.M.S.O. (1963) Final report of the Committee on the problem of NOISE. Command 2056, London.Google Scholar
Horridge, G. A. (1962) Learning of Leg position by Headless Insects. Nature, 193: 697–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffress, L. A. (1964) Effect of noise correlation on binaural signal detection. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36: 1455–58.Google Scholar
Kjang, N. Y. S., and Liberman, M. G. (1977) Tuning curves of auditory nerve fibres. Journal of the Acoustical Society of A merica, 61:27–31.Google Scholar
Licklider, J. G. R. (1951) The duplex theory of pitch perception. Experientia, 7: 128–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A., and Taylor, W. G. (1948) Perception of repeated bursts of noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20: 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, A. R. (1969) Unit responses in Rat cochlear nucleus to transient sounds. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 75: 542–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, B. C. J. (1977) Effects of relative phase of the components on the Pitch of three component complex tones in Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. D. (1977) Detection of a change in the pitch of A.M. noise. Psycho physics and Physiology of Hearing. Academic Press, 363–371.Google Scholar
Patterson, R. D. (1979) Personal communication.Google Scholar
Plomp, R. (1966) Experiments on tone perception. Institute for Perception. RVO-TNO. Soesterberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1948) Human Knowledge, its Scope and Limits. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Schouten, J. F. (1940) Five articles on the perception of sound. I.P.O. Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Schouten, J. E. et al. (1962) Pitch of the residue. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34: 1418–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1962) The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. American Psychology (january), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terhardt, E. (1974) Pitch consonance and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55: 1061–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tumarkin, A. (1945) A contribution to the theory of the auditory apparatus. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumarkin, A. (1950) The Decibel, the Phon and the Sone. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 178–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tumarkin, A. (1972) A Biologist looks at Psychoacoustics. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 21 (1): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumarkin, A. (1982) Bi-modal Hearing, the controversial second filter, and the mystery of the missing O.H.C. afferents. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 96, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wever, E. G. (1940) Theory of Hearing. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Wightman, F. L. (1973) Pattern transformation of Pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54: 407–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed