Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:18:37.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frontal sinus models and onlay templates in osteoplastic flap surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2010

M Daniel ,
J Watson ,
E Hoskison  and
A Sama
M Daniel
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK
J Watson
Affiliation:
Maxillofacial Department, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK
E Hoskison*
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK
A Sama
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Ms E Hoskison, Department of Otolaryngology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG7 2ND, UK Fax: +44 (0)115 9709748 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Precise delineation of the extent of frontal sinus pneumatisation is a crucial step in osteoplastic flap frontal sinus surgery. The authors present a novel method of achieving this objective.

Methods:

First, models of the frontal area are generated using three-dimensional printing based on pre-operative computed tomography image data. These models are then used to create an onlay template of the frontal sinus, which is used intra-operatively.

Results:

In a series of 10 patients undergoing osteoplastic flap frontal sinus surgery, the described frontal sinus templates were consistently accurate to within 1 mm.

Conclusion:

Frontal sinus templates are potentially useful adjuncts to current techniques employed to guide frontal sinus surgery.

Keywords

Frontal SinusSurgical Procedures, Operative
Type
Short Communications
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 125 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 82 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented orally at the British Rhinological Society Annual Meeting, 23rd May 2008, Liverpool, UK, and as a poster at the Midlands Institute of Otolaryngology Winter Meeting, 16th January 2009, Leicester, UK.

References

1 Meyer, TK, Smith, TL. Contemporary issues in frontal sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;10:8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Montgomery, WW. State-of-the-art for osteoplastic frontal sinus operation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001;34:167–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Murphy, J, Jones, NS. Frontal sinus obliteration. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:637–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Raghavan, U, Jones, NS. The place of Riedel's procedure in contemporary sinus surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:700–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Maniglia, AJ, Dodds, BL. A safe technique for frontal sinus osteoplastic flap. Laryngoscope 1991;101:908–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Ansari, K, Seikaly, H, Elford, G. Assessment of the accuracy and safety of the different methods used in mapping the frontal sinus. J Otolaryngol 2003;32:254–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Fewins, JL, Otto, PM, Otto, RA. Computed tomography-generated templates: a new approach to frontal sinus osteoplastic flap surgery. Am J Rhinol 2004;18:285–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Melroy, CT, Dubin, MG, Hardy, SM, Senior, BA. Analysis of methods to assess frontal sinus extent in osteoplastic flap surgery: transillumination versus 6-ft Caldwell versus image guidance. Am J Rhinol 2006;20:77–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Sindwani, R, Metson, R. Impact of image guidance on complications during osteoplastic frontal sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131:150–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Weber, R, Draf, W, Keerl, R, Kahle, G, Schinzel, S, Thomann, W et al. Osteoplastic frontal sinus surgery with fat obliteration: technique and long-term results using magnetic resonance imaging in 82 operations. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1037–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed