Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:57:04.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An approach to bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in children: contralateral placement of sleeper fixture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

J M Bernstein  and
P Z Sheehan
J M Bernstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals, UK
P Z Sheehan
Affiliation:
ENT and Hearing Clinic for Individuals with Down Syndrome, Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr J M Bernstein, Specialist Registrar in Otolaryngology, Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals, Charlestown Road, Manchester M9 7AA, UK. Fax: +44 161 918 5039 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in younger children is a two-stage procedure, with a titanium fixture being allowed to osseointegrate for several months before an abutment is fitted through a skin graft. In the first procedure, it has been usual to place a reserve or sleeper fixture approximately 5 mm from the primary fixture as a backup in case the primary fixture fails to osseointegrate. This ipsilateral sleeper fixture is expensive, is often not used, and is placed in thinner calvarial bone where it is less likely to osseointegrate successfully. The authors have implanted the sleeper fixture on the contralateral side, with the additional objective of reducing the number of procedures for bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid implantation, providing a cost-effective use for the sleeper.

Methods:

The authors implanted the bone-anchored hearing aid sleeper fixture in the contralateral temporal bone instead of on the ipsilateral side in seven successive paediatric cases with bilateral conductive hearing loss requiring two-stage bone-anchored hearing aids, treated at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, UK.

Results:

The seven patients ranged in age from five to 15 years, with a mean age of 10 years; in addition, a 20-year-old with learning disability was also treated. In each case, the contralateral sleeper fixture was not needed as a backup fixture, but was used in four patients (57 per cent) as the basis for a second-side bone-anchored hearing aid.

Conclusions:

In children with bilateral conductive hearing loss, in whom a bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid is being considered and the second side is to be operated upon at a later date, we recommend placing the sleeper fixture on the contralateral side at the time of primary first-side surgery. Our technique provides a sleeper fixture located in an optimal position, where it also offers the option of use for a second-side bone-anchored hearing aid and reduces the number of procedures needed.

Keywords

Implants and ProsthesesHearing AidsConductive DeafnessChildBone Anchored Hearing Aids
Type
Short Communications
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 5 , May 2009 , pp. 555 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the Bone Conduction Hearing and Osseo-Integration Conference, 14 July 2007, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, and at the Fourth BAHA Professionals Conference, 23 May 2008, Exeter, UK.

References

1 Sheehan, PZ, Hans, PS. UK and Ireland experience of bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA) in individuals with Down syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:981–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Stenfelt, S, Hakansson, B, Tjellstrom, A. Vibration characteristics of bone conducted sound in vitro. J Acoust Soc Am 2000;107:422–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Snik, AFM, van der Pouw, CTM, Beynon, AJ, Mylanus, EAM, Cremers, CWRJ. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:187–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Bosman, AJ, Snik, AFM, van der Pouw, CTM, Mylanus, EAM, Cremers, CW. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids. Audiology 2001;40:158–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 van der Pouw, CTM, Snik, AFM, Cremers, CWRJ. Audiometric results of bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Laryngoscope 1998;108:548–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Dutt, SN, McDermott, A, Burrell, SP, Reid, AP, Proops, DW. Speech intelligibility with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Tjellstrom, A. Osseointegrated systems and their applications in the head and neck. Adv Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;3:39–70Google Scholar
8 Proops, DW. The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: surgical methods and complications. J Laryngol Otol 1996;110(suppl):7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Zeitoun, H, De, R, Thompson, SD, Proops, DW. Osseointegrated implants in the management of childhood ear abnormalities: with particular emphasis on complications. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:87–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Davids, T, Gordon, KA, Clutton, D, Papsin, BC. Bone-anchored hearing aids in infants and children younger than 5 years. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:51–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed