Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:05:17.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquired subglottic stenosis: aetiological profile and treatment results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2014

S Pookamala ,
A Thakar ,
K Puri ,
P Singh ,
R Kumar  and
S C Sharma
S Pookamala
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
A Thakar*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
K Puri
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
P Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
R Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
S C Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
*
Address for correspondence: Mr A Thakar, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India Fax: 00-91-11-26588663 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

To analyse the aetiological profile and surgical results of patients with acquired chronic subglottic stenosis, and formulate a surgical scheme based on an audit of various surgical procedures.

Methods:

Thirty patients were treated by 65 procedures (31 endoscopic and 34 external) between 2004 and 2009.

Results:

Isolated subglottic stenosis was noted as unusual in the majority (27 cases), demonstrating contiguous tracheal or glottic involvement. The major aetiologies were intubation injury (n = 8) and external injury (n = 21) (i.e. blunt trauma, strangulation or penetrating injury). Vocal fold immobility and cartilage framework involvement were frequent with external injury and infrequent with intubation injury. Luminal restoration was achieved by endoscopic procedures in 2 cases, external procedures in 19 cases, and external plus adjuvant endoscopic procedures in 8 cases. The preferred surgical options were: endoscopic procedures, restricted to short, recent, grade I or II mucosal stenosis cases; and external procedures for all other stenosis situations, including isolated subglottic (anterior cricoid split plus cartilage graft), subglottic and glottic or high subglottic (anterior plus posterior cricoid split with cartilage graft), and subglottic and tracheal (cricotracheal resection with anastomosis).

Conclusions:

External injury stenosis has a worse profile than intubation injury stenosis. Anatomical categorisation of subglottic stenosis guides surgical procedure selection. Endoscopic procedures have limited indications as primary procedures but are useful adjunctive procedures.

Keywords

LarynxTracheal StenosisAcquired Subglottic StenosisLaryngostenosis
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 7 , July 2014 , pp. 641 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Pradhan, T, Sikka, K, Thakar, A. Posterior cricoid split with costal cartilage augmentation for high subglottic stenosis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;60:147–51Google Scholar
2Roediger, FC, Orloff, LA, Courey, MS. Adult subglottic stenosis: management with laser incisions and mitomycin-C. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1542–6Google Scholar
3Terra, RM, Minamoto, H, Carneiro, F, Pego-Fernandes, PM, Jatene, FB. Laryngeal split and rib cartilage inter-positional grafting: treatment option for glottic/subglottic stenosis in adults. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137:818–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Jović, RM, Dragičević, D, Komazec, Z, Mitrović, S, Janjević, D, Gašić, J. Laryngotracheal stenosis and restenosis. What has the influence on the final outcome? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:1805–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Kelkar, P, Shah, R, Mahandru, JP, Kasbekar, V. Management of laryngo-tracheal stenosis by Shiann – Yann Lee technique. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;56:1–4Google Scholar
6George, M, Jaquet, Y, Ikonomidis, C, Monnier, P. Management of severe paediatric subglottic stenosis with glottic involvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:411–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Myer, CM, O'Connor, DM, Cotton, RT. Proposed grading system for subglottic stenosis based on endotracheal tube sizes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103:319–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Little, FB, Koufman, JA, Kohut, RI, Marshall, RB. Effect of gastric acid on the pathogenesis of subglottic stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985;94:516–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Amoros, JM, Ramos, R, Villalonga, R, Morera, R, Ferrer, G, Diaz, P. Tracheal and cricotracheal resection for laryngotracheal stenosis: experience in 54 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:35–9Google Scholar
10Ciccone, AM, De Giacomo, T, Venuta, F, Ibrahim, M, Diso, D, Coloni, GF et al. Operative and non-operative treatment of benign subglottic laryngotracheal stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:818–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Wu, MH, Tsai, YF, Lin, MY, Hsu, IL, Fong, Y. Complete laryngotracheal disruption caused by blunt injury. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1211–15Google Scholar
12Ford, HR, Gardner, MJ, Lynch, JM. Laryngotracheal disruption from blunt paediatric neck injuries: impact of early recognition and intervention on outcome. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:331–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Zalzal, GH. Treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis with anterior and posterior cartilage grafts. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:82–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Cotton, RT, Myer, CM, O'Connor, DM, Smith, ME. Paediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction with cartilage grafts and endotracheal tube stenting: the single-stage approach. Laryngoscope 1995;105:818–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Smith, LP, Zur, KB, Jacobs, IN. Single- vs double-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;136:60–5Google Scholar
16Puma, F, Ragusa, M, Avenia, N, Urbani, M, Droghetti, A, Daddi, N et al. The role of silicone stents in the treatment of cicatricial tracheal stenoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:1064–9Google Scholar
17Simpson, GT, Strong, MS, Healy, GB, Shapshay, SM, Vaughan, CW. Predictive factors of success or failure in the endoscopic management of laryngeal and tracheal stenosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91:384–8Google Scholar
18Monnier, P, George, M, Monod, M, Lang, F. The role of the CO2 laser in the management of laryngotracheal stenosis: a survey of 100 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:602–8Google Scholar