Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:43:09.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speaking to those who know it best: Does participation in an experiment explain citizens’ attitudes to basic income?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2020

Miska Simanainen  and
Olli Kangas
Miska Simanainen*
Affiliation:
Social Insurance Institution, Research Department, Helsinki, Finland
Olli Kangas
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Department of Social Research, Turku, Finland
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, we analyse the relationship of participation in the Finnish basic income (BI) experiment and people’s attitudes towards a BI. The experiment, implemented in 2017–2018, aimed to improve citizens’ employment and well-being by reducing the eligibility conditions of basic social benefits and by increasing monetary incentives to find employment. The data on attitudes come from responses to a survey carried out during the experiment. Identical questions were posed to the treatment (receiving the BI) and the control group of the experiment. The contributions of this paper are (1) an estimation of the relationship between participation and opinions on BI, (2) an analysis of the heterogeneity of the relationship and (3) an estimation of the relationship between participation and people’s ability to express their opinions on BI. Our findings indicate that participation in the experiment significantly explains people’s support for a BI and their ability to express opinions.

Keywords

Basic incomelegitimacyopinionspreferencesfield experiment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 36 , Special Issue 3: Special issue: The Social Legitimacy of Basic Income: A Multidimensional and Cross-national Perspective , November 2020 , pp. 269 - 283
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Social Policy Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airio, I., Kangas, O., Koskenvuo, K., & Laatu, M. (2016). Tasaveroon pohjautuviin perustulomalleihin suhtaudutaan varauksellisesti. Research blog. Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Retrieved from http://blogi.kansanelakelaitos.fi/arkisto/2942Google Scholar
Andersson, J. O., & Kangas, O. (2002). Perustulon kannatus Suomessa. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 67(4), 293–307.Google Scholar
Andersson, J. O., & Kangas, O. (2005). Universalism in the age of workfare. Attitudes to basic income in Sweden and Finland. In Kildal, N. & Kuhnle, S. (Eds.), Normative foundations of the welfare state: The Nordic experience. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blomberg, H., Jauhiainen, S., Kanerva, M., Kangas, O., Komu, M., Kroll, C., Lassander, M., Niemelä, M., Simanainen, M., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., & Ylikännö, M. (2019). Wellbeing effects of the basic income experiment. In Kangas, O., Jauhiainen, S., Simanainen, M., & Ylikännö, M. (Eds.), The basic income experiment 2017–2018 in Finland: Preliminary results. Reports and memorandums of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (Vol. 9). Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978–952–00-4035-2Google Scholar
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2002). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wispelaere, J. (2015). An income of one’s own? The political analysis of universal basic income. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
De Wispelaere, J., & Noguera, J. A. (2012). Political feasibility of basic income. An analytic framework. In Caputo, R. (Ed.), Basic income guarantee and politics. International experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee (Exploring the basic income guarantee). (pp. 17–38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ervasti, H., Goul-Andersen, J., Fridberg, T., & Ringdal, K. (Eds.). (2012). The future of the welfare state: Social policy attitudes and social capital in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESS (European Social Survey). (2018). Europeans receptive to new welfare policy ideas. Retrieved from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/about/news/essnews0054.htmlGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Halmetoja, A., De Wispelaere, J., & Perkiö, J. (2019). A policy comet in Moominland? Basic income in the Finnish welfare state. Social Policy & Society, 18(2), 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiilamo, H., & Kangas, O. (2009). Trap for women or freedom to choose? The struggle over cash for child care schemes in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Social Policy, 38(3), 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hämäläinen, K., Kanninen, O., Simanainen, M., & Verho, J. (2019). Employment effects for the first year of the basic income experiment. In Kangas, O., Jauhiainen, S., Simanainen, M., & Ylikännö, M. (Eds.), The basic income experiment 2017–2018 in Finland: Preliminary results. Reports and memorandums of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (Vol. 9). Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-4035-2Google Scholar
Kangas, O., Niemelä, M., & Varjonen, S. (2014). When and why do ideas matter? The influence of framing on opinion formation and policy change. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, O., & Pulkka, V.-V. (Eds.). (2016). From idea to experiment. Report on universal basic income experiment in Finland. Working papers 106. Helsinki: Research at Kela.Google Scholar
Kangas, O., Honkanen, P., & Simanainen, M. (2017). Basic income in the Finnish Context. Intereconomics, 52(2), 87–91. Retrieved from https://archive.intereconomics.eu/year/2017/2/basic-income-in-the-finnish-context/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, C. A. (2006). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2018). Attitudes toward universal basic income and welfare state in Europe: A research note. Basic Income Studies, 13(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, arguments & persuasion in the policy process. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
PanelBase. (2019). PanelBase survey about the Brexit deal. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-50123223Google Scholar
Pulkka, V.-V. (2019). Finland shares unconditional money, but the public view remains polarised. IPR Blog. Retrieved from http://blogs.bath.ac.uk/iprblog/2018/01/23/finland-shares-unconditional-money-but-the-public-view-remains-polarised/Google Scholar
Purdy, D. (1988). Political feasibility of the transition to a basic income society. In Van Trier, W. (Ed.), Basic income and problems of implementation. Proceedings of the second international conference on basic income (pp. 45–64). London: Basic Income Research Group.Google Scholar
Roosma, F., & Van Oorschot, W. (2020). Public opinion on basic income: Mapping European support for a radical alternative for welfare provision. Journal of European Social Policy, 30, 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Dermont, C. (2019). Citizens’ opinions about basic income proposals compared – A conjoint analysis of Finland and Switzerland. Journal of Social Policy, 49, 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279419000412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svallfors, S. (Ed.). (2012). Contested welfare states: Welfare attitudes in Europe and beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P., & Leruth, B. (Eds.). (2018). Attitudes, aspirations and welfare. Social policy directions in uncertain times. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widerquist, K. (2019). Three waves of basic income support. In Torry, M. (Ed.), The Palgrave international handbook of basic income. Exploring the basic income guarantee (pp. 31–34). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. J. H., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B., & Reeskens, T. (Eds.). (2017). The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness. Chelgtenhamn: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlandas, T. (2019). The politics of the basic income guarantee: Analysing individual support in Europe. Basic Income Studies, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2018-0021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YouGov Survey. (2019). Finland. Retrieved from https://app.crunch.io/api/public/crunchbox/share/?data=%2F%2Fs.crunch.io%2Fwidget%2Findex.html%23%2Fds%2F86a25358fa114261b99e52107924a87f%3Fviz%3DgroupedBarPlot%26cp%3Dpercent%26dp%3D0%26grp%3DstackGoogle Scholar