Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T10:20:29.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of institutional change in minimum income protection in Sweden and Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Anna Angelin ,
Håkan Johansson  and
Max Koch
Anna Angelin*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Lund University, Box 23, Lund22100, Sweden
Håkan Johansson
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Lund University, Box 23, Lund22100, Sweden
Max Koch
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, Lund University, Box 23, Lund22100, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Germany is generally regarded as a case of qualitative “change” in minimum income protection (MIP) schemes, while Sweden is perceived as one of institutional “inertia”. This paper seeks to qualify this view by embedding developments in MIP in wider policy and governance trends. Empirically, it is based on document analysis and qualitative expert interviews in the two countries. Theoretically, the paper applies recent institutional approaches that address patterns of change in more complex ways. In Sweden, an exclusive focus on formal continuity regarding social assistance would disguise its change in function from temporary security system of last resort into one that permanently provides income protection when neighboring policy fields, unemployment and sickness insurance, are downsized. Conversely, in Germany a merger of social assistance and unemployment assistance took place. Yet an exclusive focus on the Hartz reforms would downplay the degree of continuity that nevertheless exists in the unemployment insurance.

Keywords

incremental institutional changeminimum income protectionsocial assistancewelfare reformsSwedenGermany
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 165 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, A., Johansson, H., Koch, M., & Panican, A. (2013). Work package 5 – The national arena for combating poverty: National report Sweden. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Bahle, T., Huble, V., & Pfeifer, M. (2011). The last safety net. A handbook of minimum income protection in Europe. Chicago: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2001). Political institutions, veto points, and the process of welfare state adaption. In Pierson, P. (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 238–264). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, D. (2013). Work package 5 – The national arena for combating poverty dynamics and varieties of active inclusion: A five-country comparison. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Duit, A. (2007). Path dependency and institutional change: The case of industrial emission control in Sweden. Public Administration, 85(4), 1097–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, M., & Rhodes, M. (2007). Building a sustainable welfare state. West European Politics, 23(2), 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrarini, T., Nelson, K., Palme, J., & Sjöberg, O. (2012). Sveriges socialförsäkringar i jämförande perspektiv. En institutionell analys av sjuk-, arbetsskade- och arbetslöshetsförsäkringarna i 18 OECD-länder 1930 till 2010, Underlagsrapport nr. 10 till den parlamentariska socialförsäkringsutredningen (S2010:04). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet.Google Scholar
Hacker, S. (2005). Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment. In Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 40–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holst, H., & Dörre, K. (2013). Revival of the “German model”? Destandardization and the new labour market regime. In Koch, M. & Fritz, M. (Eds.), Non-standard employment in Europe – Paradigms, prevalence and policy responses (pp. 132–149). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvinden, B. (2011). The nordic welfare model and the challenge of globalisation. In Böss, M. (Ed.), The nation state in transformation: Economic globalisation, institutional mediation and political values (pp. 292–314). Århus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, H. (2001). Activation in the Nordic countries. Social democratic universalism under pressure. Journal of European Area Studies, 9(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautto, M., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., Kvist, J., & Uusitalo, H. (2001). Introduction: How distinct are the nordic welfare states? InKautto, M., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., Kvist, J., & Uusitalo, H. (Eds.), Nordic welfare states in the European context (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (2010). Rescaling social policies towards multilevel governance in Europe: Some reflections on processes at stake and actors involved. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Rescaling social policies towards multilevel governance in Europe. Vienna: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Koch, M. (2005). Wage determination, socio-economic regulation and the state. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11(3), 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konle-Seidl, R., Eichhorst, W., & Grienberger-Zingerle, M. (2007). Activation policies in Germany. From status protection to basic income support. Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung, Discussion Paper No. 6/2007. Nürnberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (2006). Power resources and employer-centred approaches in explanations of welfare states and varieties of capitalism: Protagonists, consenters and antagonists. World Politics, 58(2), 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In Mahoney, J. & Thelen, K. (Eds.), Explaining institutional change. Ambiguity, agency and power (pp. 5–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oschmiansky, F., Mauer, A., & Schulze Buschoff, K. (2007). Arbeitsmarktreformen in Deutschland – Zwischen Pfadabhängigkeit und Paradigmenwechsel [Labour market reform in Germany – between path dependency and paradigm shift]. WSI Mitteilungen 6/2007, 291–297.Google Scholar
Petzold, N. (2013). Work package 5 – The national arena for combating poverty. National report: Germany. Oldenburg: Jean Monnet Centre for Europeanisation and Transnational Regulation.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocco, P., & Thurston, C. (2014). From metaphors to measures: Observable indicators of gradual institutional change. Journal of Public Policy, 34(1), 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salonen, T. (2013). Det nödvändiga uppbrottet – reformera det ekonomiska biståndet [The necessary breaking-up – reform the social assistance]. Stockholm: Arenagruppen.Google Scholar
Seeleib-Kaiser, M., & Fleckenstein, T. (2007). Discourse, learning and welfare state change: The case of German labour market reforms. Social Policy and Administration, 41(5), 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. (1997). German capitalism: Does it exist? Can it survive? InCrouch, C. & Streeck, W. (Eds.), Political economy of modern capitalism? (pp. 33–54). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 3–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. (2009). Institutional change in advanced political economies. First annual lecture of the BJIR. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 471–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2000). Veto players and institutional analysis. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(4), 441–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Heijden, J. (2011). Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept. Politics, 31(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, B. (2002). Rational choice institutionalism. In Katznelson, I. & Milner, H. (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 660–692). New York: Norton.Google Scholar