Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:11:31.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Keynes and the historical specificity of institutions: a response to Rod O'Donnell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2019

Geoffrey M. Hodgson
Geoffrey M. Hodgson*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University London, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is a response to the criticism by Rod O'Donnell of the account of Keynes’ notion of a general theory in the book How Economics Forgot History (Hodgson, 2001). Several points of full agreement are noted, including the fact that Keynes’ work contains much discussion of historically specific institutions, including the financial and market institutions of modern capitalism. But it is argued here that even copious discussion of historically specific institutions is insufficient to indicate an adequate understanding or conceptual appreciation of historical periodisation or evolution, as developed in various ways by Karl Marx, the German historical school and the original American institutionalists. Keynes’ General Theory is best understood as a theory of modern capitalism. But Keynes did not have sufficient acquaintance with these historically oriented schools of thought to even define the concept of capitalism, or to make that specific historical association clear.

Keywords

John Maynard Keyneshistorical specificitycapitalisminstitutions
Type
Comment
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 733 - 740
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backhouse, R. E. (1996), ‘The Changing Character of British Economics’, History of Political Economy, Annual Supplement to Volume 28, pp. 33–60.Google Scholar
Chick, V. (1986), ‘The Evolution of the Banking System and the Theory of Saving, Investment and Interest’, Economies et societées, 20, serie Monnaie et Production, pp. 111–126. Reprinted in V. Chick (1991), On Money, Method and Keynes: Selected Essays by Victoria Chick, edited by P. Arestis and S. C. Dow, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1924), Legal Foundations of Capitalism, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1934), Institutional Economics – Its Place in Political Economy, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. R. (1991), Wage Labor and Guilds in Medieval Europe, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Garvy, G. (1975), ‘Keynes and the Economic Activists of Pre-Hitler Germany’, Journal of Political Economy, 83(2): 391–405.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. (2011), Debt: The First 5,000 Years, New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1989), ‘Post-Keynesianism and Institutionalism: The Missing Link’, in Pheby, J. (ed.) (1989), New Directions in Post Keynesian Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 94–123. Reprinted in G. M. Hodgson (1991), After Marx and Sraffa: Essays in Political Economy, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1999), ‘Post Keynesianism and Institutionalism: Another Look at the Link’, in Setterfield, M. (ed.) (1999), Growth, Employment and Inflation: Essays in Honour of John Cornwall, London: Macmillan, pp. 72–87.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2001), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2013), From Pleasure Machines to Moral Communities: An Evolutionary Economics without Homo Economicus, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2015), Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2019), ‘Taxonomic Definitions in Social Science, with Firms, Markets and Institutions as Case Studies’, Journal of Institutional Economics (forthcoming). DOI: 10.1017/S1744137418000334.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, Thorbjørn (2010), Darwin's Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1930), A Treatise on Money, Vol. 1: The Pure Theory of Money, Vol. 2: The Applied Theory of Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1931), Essays in Persuasion, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1973), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIII, The General Theory and After, Part I: Preparation, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1981), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIX, The Return to Gold and Industrial Policy, 2 parts, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1982), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XXI, Activities 1931–1939: World Crises and Policies in Britain and America, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knapp, G. F. (1924), The State Theory of Money, translated and abridged from the fourth German edition of 1923, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. (1885), ‘The Present Position of Economics’, in Pigou, A. C. (ed.) (1925), Memorials of Alfred Marshall (London: Macmillan), pp. 152–174. Reprinted with an introduction by G. M. Hodgson in the Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1): 121–137.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1976), Capital, vol. 1, translated from the fourth German edition of 1890, Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1976), Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Collected Works, Vol. 6, Marx and Engels: 1845–1848, London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1982), Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Collected Works, Vol. 38, Letters 1844–1851, London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, R. (2018), ‘General Theorising and Historical Specificity: Hodgson on Keynes’, Journal of Institutional Economics, published online. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137418000413.Google Scholar
Postan, M. M. (1972), The Medieval Economy and Society: Economic History of Britain, 1100–1500, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science (1st edn), London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, translated by R. Opie from the second German edition of 1926, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical Statistical and Historical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, 2 vols, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954), History of Economic Analysis, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols, London: Strahan and Cadell.Google Scholar