Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:45:47.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflexivity in Indigenous Research: Reframing and Decolonising Research?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2012

Gabrielle Russell-Mundine
Gabrielle Russell-Mundine*
Affiliation:
Blackcockatoo Biz, Australia1
*
Correspondence Dr Gabrielle Russell-Mundine, Blackcockatoo Biz, PO Box 981, Woy Woy NSW 2256Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Indigenous researchers continuously challenge the structure of western-based research agendas in order to reframe and decolonise research. Integral to an Indigenous research paradigm is an understanding that researchers bring a particular world-view that is predicated on factors such as their gender, culture and socioeconomic status. For non-Indigenous researchers working in an Indigenous context the imperative to understand one's impact and position within the research becomes even more important. This reflective article considers the practice of reflexivity in an Indigenous context and discusses whether it enables the non-Indigenous researcher to contribute to the decolonising and reframing of research. Also considered is whether reflexivity can appear to contribute to reframing research, but still fail to address important issues such as interrogating the researcher's position in relation to the dominant western system of knowledge creation. In this article, I firstly outline an Indigenous research paradigm. Secondly, I make the link between engaging in reflexive practice and an Indigenous context and identify some limitations. Finally, I conclude that reflexivity will only lead to reframing and decolonising research if it also addresses deeper issues such as interrogating the systems of the dominant White culture.

Keywords

Indigenous researchIndigenous tourismreflexivitycritical whiteness studies
Type
Special Issue: Beyond the Margins (Critical Tourism and Hospitality)
Information
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management , Volume 19 , July 2012 , e7
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. (2001). Lifting the blankets: The transgenerational effects of trauma in Indigenous Australia. Brisbane, Australia: School of Humanities, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. (2002). Trauma trails, recreating song lines: The transgenerational effects of trauma in Indigenous Australia. North Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
Brady, M. (1981). Some problems of method and theory in Aboriginal research, In Cashman, P.K. (Ed.), Research and the delivery of legal services (pp. 281–285). Sydney, Australia: Law Foundation of NSW.Google Scholar
Brady, M. (1990). The problem with ‘problematising research’. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 1, 18–20.Google Scholar
Brewster, A., & Probin-Rapsey, F. (2007). Introduction: Approaching Whiteness. Australian Humanities Review, 42. Retrieved from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/10116/20080522-0750/www.australianhumanitiesreview.org/archive/Issue-August-September%202007/Intro.html accessed 29/04/2012Google Scholar
Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Health. (2001). Research partnerships: Yarning about research with indigenous peoples (Workshop Report 1). Alice Springs, Australia: CRCATH.Google Scholar
Dodson, M. (2003). The end in the beginning. In Grossman, M. (Ed.), Blacklines: Contemporary critical writing by Indigenous Australians (pp. 25–42). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
England, K. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research, Professional Geographer., 46, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, D. (2003). Indigenous epistemology and indigenous standpoint theory. Social Alternatives, 22, 44–52.Google Scholar
Fredericks, B. (2009). The epistemology that maintains white race privilege, power and control of Indigenous studies and Indigenous peoples’ participation in universities. Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association e-Journal, 5, 1–12.Retrieved from http://www.acrawsa.org.au/files/ejournalfiles/45acrawsa518.pdfGoogle Scholar
Freshwater, D., & Avis, M. (2004). Analysing interpretation and reinterpreting analysis: Exploring the logic of critical reflection. Nursing Philosophy, 5, 4–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, J., Dunbar, T., Arnott, A., Scrimgeour, M., Matthews, S., Murakami-Gold, L., & Chamberlain, A. (2002). Indigenous research reform agenda: Rethinking research methodologies (Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal and Tropical Healthy Links Monograph). Darwin, Australia: CRCATH.Google Scholar
Higgins-Desbiolles, F., Powys White, K., & Mian, A. (2012, February). The importance of remaining critical. Working paper presented at the 2012 Annual CAUTHE Conference, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Martin, K. (2001a, September). Ways of knowing, ways of being and ways of doing: Developing a theoretical framework and methods for indigenous re-search and Indigenist research. Paper presented at the AIATSIS Indigenous Studies Conference, ‘The Power of Knowledge, The Resonance of Tradition’. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Martin, K. (2001b). Aboriginal people, Aboriginal lands and Indigenist research: A discussion of re-search pasts and neo-colonial research futures (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.Google Scholar
Martin, K. (2002). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for Indigenous and Indigenist re-search. Voicing Dissent: Journal of Australian Studies, 76, 203–214.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2003). Tiddas talkin’ up to the white woman: When Huggins et al. took on Bell. In Grossman, M. (Ed.), Blacklines: Contemporary critical writing by Indigenous Australians (pp. 66–77). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (1998). Anthropological texts and Indigenous standpoints. Journal of Aboriginal Studies, 2, 3–15.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (n.d.). Shaping Indigenous research agendas and directions. [In notes accompanying seminar on Indigenous Research Methodologies, Gnibi College, Southern Cross University, 2005].Google Scholar
Nakata, M, (2003). Better. In Grossman, M. (Ed.), Blacklines: Contemporary critical writing by Indigenous Australians (pp. 132–144). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Canberra, Australia: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Rigney, L.-I. (1996, June). Tools for an Indigenist research methodology: A Narungga Perspective. Paper Presented at the World Indigenous Peoples Conference: Education. Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Rigney, L.-I. (1997, July). Internationalisation of an Indigenous anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles. Paper presented at the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Research Australia (HERSDA) Annual International Conference, ‘Research and Development in Higher Education: Advancing International Perspectives’, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
Rigney, L.-I. (1999, November). The first perspective: Culturally safe research practices on or with Indigenous peoples. Keynote address, at the Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
Rigney, L.-I. (2001). A first perspective of Indigenous Australian participation in science: Framing Indigenous research towards Indigenous Australian intellectual sovereignty. Kaurna Higher Education Journal, 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell-Mundine, G. (2010). From pumpkins to property management: Developing the organisational capacity of the Jubal Aboriginal Corporation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia. Retrieved from http://epubs.scu.edu.au/theses/150/Google Scholar
Smith, L.T. (2005). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar