Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:05:39.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Nematodes met with in a Biological Investigation of Sewage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

B. G. Peters
Affiliation:
From the Department of Helminthology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Extract

This is the third and final paper of a series which constitutes a report on a biological investigation of sewage, undertaken by the writer as a Research Scholar of the Grocers' Company. Of the previous two papers, the first (1929) describes a colorimeter and the second (1930) is a general report on the work as a whole. Since the nematodes form a neglected and not inconsiderable section of the fauna of most sewage plants, special attention was accorded them, and an account of them is given separately here instead of rendering the general report unbalanced and unwieldy by being included there.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bütschli, O., 1876.—“Untersuchungen über freilebende Nematoden und die Gattung Chætonotus.” Z. wiss. Zool., XXVI, 363413. (W.L. 23635.)Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1893.—“Nematodes, mostly Australian and Fijian.” Macleay Mem. Vol., Linn. Soc. N.S.W., 252308.Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A., 1913.—“New Nematode Genera found inhabiting Fresh Water and Non-brackish Soils.” J. Wash. Acad. Sci., III, 432444. (W.L. 11600.)Google Scholar
de Man, J. G., 1876.—“Onderzoekingen over vrij in de Aarde levende Nematoden.” Tijdschr. ned. dierk. Ver. (2); Not Consulted. (W.L. 21275.)Google Scholar
de Man, J. G., 1896.—“Description of Three Species of Anguillulidæ, Observed in Diseased Pseudo-bulbs of Tropical Orchids.” Proc. Lpool. Biol. Soc., IX, 7694. (W.L. 16792.)Google Scholar
Maupas, E., 1900.—“Modes et Formes de Reproduction des Nématodes.” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., 3rd Series, VIII, 463624. (W.L. 1915.)Google Scholar
Micoletzky, H., 1921.—“Die freilebenden Erd-Nematoden.” Arch. Naturgesch., LXXXVII, Abt. A, 1650. (W.L. 1782.)Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1928.—“Some Nematodes of a Sewage disposal Plant,” an otherwise unpublished section of a Thesis, “Saprophytic Eelworms,” submitted to the University of London, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1929.—“A New Wedge-colorimeter used in a Biological Investigation of Sewage.” J. Helm., VII., 201214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G., 1930.—“A Biological Investigation of Sewage.” J. Helm., VIII, pp. 133164.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., 1866.—“Monographic der Nematoden.” VIII + 357, 28 plates. (Berlin.)Google Scholar
Steiner, G., 1914.—“Freilebende Nematoden aus der Schweiz.” Arch. Hydrobiol. Plankt, IX; Not Consulted. (W.L. 1769.)Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A., 1898.—“De Nematoden der Koffiewortels.” Meded. PITuin Batavia, XXVII; Not Consulted. (W.L. 12949.)Google Scholar