Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-02T18:17:47.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Redescription of Macrolaimus canadensis Sanwal, 1960 and M. ruehmi Andrássy, 1966 (Nematoda, Rhabditida, Chambersiellidae), and new data on M. crucis Maupas, 1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2018

J. Abolafia ,
A.N. Ruiz-Cuenca ,
J. Foit  and
V. Čermak
J. Abolafia*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus ‘Las Lagunillas’ s/n. 23071-Jaén, Spain
A.N. Ruiz-Cuenca
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Animal, Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Universidad de Jaén, Campus ‘Las Lagunillas’ s/n. 23071-Jaén, Spain
J. Foit
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
V. Čermak
Affiliation:
Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Division of diagnostics, Šlechtitelů 773/23, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author for correspondence: J. Abolafia, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three species belonging to the genus Macrolaimus, namely M. canadensis, M. crucis and M. ruehmi, have been obtained from areas of natural vegetation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Corsica (France), the Czech Republic and Spain. These three species are characterized by the body length of males and females, stomatal proportion of the gymnostom and cheilostom, excretory pore position, postvulval uterine sac length, male and female tail length and morphology, and the length and morphology of the spicules and gubernacula. The occurrence of M. crucis in Spain has, as a result of this study, now also been expanded to a larger area of the southern Iberian Peninsula. Morphological and morphometrical analyses showed that M. canadensis and M. ruehmi are very similar, sharing apomorphic characters. In contrast, M. crucis has plesiomorphic characters. Description, measurements and illustrations are provided for these three species.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 93 , Issue 1 , January 2019 , pp. 109 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abolafia, J (2015) A low-cost technique to manufacture a container to process meiofauna for scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy Research and Technique 78, 771–776.Google Scholar
Abolafia, J and Peña-Santiago, R (2014) Redescription of Macrolaimus crucis Maupas, 1900 (Nematoda: Rhabditida: Chambersiellidae) from Spain, with scanning electron microscopy study and a compendium of the genus. Journal of Natural History 48, 257–273.Google Scholar
Abolafia, J and Peña-Santiago, R (2017) On the identity of Chiloplacus magnus Rashid & Heyns, 1990 and C. insularis Orselli & Vinciguerra, 2002 (Rhabditida: Cephalobidae), two confusable species. Nematology 19, 1017–1034.Google Scholar
Andrássy, I (1966) Erd- und Süsswasser-Nematoden aus Ghana Klasse Secernentea (Phasmidia). Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestensis de Rolando Eötvös nominatae – Sectio Biologica 8, 5–24.Google Scholar
Andrássy, I (1984) Klasse Nematoda (Ordnungen Monhysterida, Desmoscolecida, Araeolaimida, Chromadorida, Rhabditida). Bestimmungsbücher zur Bodenfauna Europas, No. 9. Berlin, Deutschland, Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Baermann, G (1917) Eine einfache Methode zur Auffindung von Ankylostomum (Nematoden) Larven in Erdproben. Geneeskundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-Indië 57, 131–137.Google Scholar
Bert, W, Leliaert, F, Vierstraete, AR, Vanfleteren, JR and Borgonie, G (2008) Molecular phylogeny of the Tylenchina and evolution of the female gonoduct (Nematoda: Rhabditida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48, 728–744.Google Scholar
Boström, S, Holovachov, O and Nadler, SA (2011) Description of Scottnema lindsayae Timm, 1971 (Rhabditida: Cephalobidae) from Taylor Valley, Antarctica and its phylogenetic relationship. Polar Biology 34, 1–12.Google Scholar
Chabaud, AG and Petter, A (1961) Nématodes du genre Acuaria de la Faune de France. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 36, 409–424.Google Scholar
Chitwood, BG and Chitwood, MB (Eds) (1950) An introduction to nematology. Baltimore, Maryland, USA, Monumental Printing Company.Google Scholar
Cid del Prado, VI (2012) Two new species of nematodes (Cephalobida: Chambersiellidae) from moss from North and South America. Nematropica 42, 108–114.Google Scholar
De Grisse, AT (1969) Redescription ou modification de quelques techniques utilisees dans l'etude des nematodes phytoparasitaires. Mededelingen van de Rijksfakulteit Landbowwetenschappen Gent 34, 351–369.Google Scholar
De Ley, P, van de Velde, MC, Mounport, D, Baujard, P and Coomans, A (1995) Ultrastructure of the stoma in Cephalobidae, Panagrolaimidae and Rhaditidae, with a proposal for a revised stoma terminology in Rhabditida (Nematoda). Nematologica 41, 153–182.Google Scholar
De Man, JG (1880) Die Einheimischen, frei in der reinen Erde und im süssen Wasser lebende Nematoden. Vorläufiger Bericht und descriptivsystematischer Theil. Tijdschrift van de Nederlandse Dierkundige Vereeniging 5, 1–104.Google Scholar
Fuchs, G (1938) Neue Parasiten und Halbparasiten bei Borkenkäfern und einige andere Nematoden. Zoologische Jahrbücher (Systematik) 71, 123–190.Google Scholar
Holovachov, O, Esquivel, A and Bongers, T (2003) Free-living nematodes from nature reserves in Costa Rica. 4. Cephalobina. Nematology 5, 1–15.Google Scholar
Laumond, C and Carle, P (1971) Nématodes associés et parasites de Blastophagus destruens Woll. (Col. Scolytidae). Entomophaga 16, 51–66.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, S (1978) New and known gonadal characters in free-living nematodes and the phylogenetic implications. Zeitschrift für zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 16, 108–115.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, S (1981) Entwurf eines phylogenetischen Systems der freilebenden Nematoden. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, Supplement 7, 1–472.Google Scholar
Massey, CL (1963) Santafea new genus (Rhabditoidea, Chambersiellidae) and a change in the systematic position of Macrolaimus Maupas, 1900. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 30, 26–28.Google Scholar
Massey, CL (1966) The nematode parasites and associates of Drendroctonus adjunctus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in New Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 59, 424–440.Google Scholar
Massey, CL (1974) Biology and taxonomy of nematode parasites and associates of bark beetles in the United States. Agriculture Handbook, 446, Forest Service. Washington DC, US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Nadler, SA, De Ley, P, Mundo-Ocampo, M, et al. (2006) Phylogeny of Cephalobina (Nematoda): molecular evidence for recurrent evolution of probolae and incongruence with traditional classifications. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40, 696–711.Google Scholar
Maupas, EF (1900) Modes et formes de reproduction des nématodes. Archives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale 8, 463–624.Google Scholar
Meyl, AH (1960) Die freilebenden Erd- und Süsswassernematoden (Fadenwürmer). Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas I (5a). Leipzig, Verlag von Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Osche, G (1958) Beiträge zur Morphologie, Ökologie, und Phylogenie der Ascaridoidea. Parallelen in der Evolution von Parasit und Wirt. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 18, 479–492.Google Scholar
Rahm, GM (1928) Alguns nematodes parasitas e semi-parasitas das plantas culturaes do Brasil. Archivos do Instituto de Biologia e Defensa Agricola e Animal 1, 239–251.Google Scholar
Rahm, GM (1929) Alguns nematodes parasitas e semi-parasitas de diversas plantas culturaes do Brasil. Archivos do Instituto de Biologia e Defensa Agricola e Animal 2, 67–136.Google Scholar
Rühm, W (1956) Die Nematoden der Ipiden. Parasitologische Schriftenreihe 6, 1–435.Google Scholar
Sanwal, KC (1957) Chambersiellidae n. fam. (Nematoda), with emended diagnosis of the genus Chambersiella Cobb, 1920, description of C. bakeri n. sp., and discussion of taxonomic position. Canadian Journal of Zoology 35, 615–621.Google Scholar
Sanwal, KC (1960) Macrolaimus canadensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Panagrolaiminae), from the frass of the bark beetle Phloeosinus canadensis Swaine, 1917, with remarks on other species of the genus Macrolaimus Maupas, 1900. Canadian Journal of Zoology 38, 1127–1131.Google Scholar
Sanwal, KC (1971) Geraldius n. gen., Macrolaiminae n. subfam., with a revision of the subfamilies and genera of Chambersiellidae (Nematoda). Canadian Journal of Zoology 49, 965–967.Google Scholar
Shokoohi, E, Panahi, H, Fourie, H and Abolafia, J (2018) Description of Macrolaimus arboreus Truskova & Eroshenko, 1977 (Rhabditida, Chambersiellidae) from Iran. Nematology, in press.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, MR (1964) Studies on Discolaimus spp. (Nematoda: Dorylaimidae) from India. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 2, 174–184.Google Scholar
Swart, A and Heyns, J (1992) Macrolaimus richteri spec. nov. (Nematoda: Chambersiellidae) from the Richtersveld, South Africa. Koedoe 35, 19–23.Google Scholar
Timm, RW (1960) Brevibucca punctata n. sp. and Macrolaimus natator n. sp., new soil nematodes from East Pakistan. Biologia, Pakistan 6, 252–256.Google Scholar
Travassos, L (1927a) Sobre o genero Oxysomatium. Boletim Biologico, Sao Paulo 5, 20–21.Google Scholar
Travassos, L (1927b) Uma nova Capillaria parasita de peixes de agua doce: Capillaria sentinosa n. sp. Boletim Biologico, Sao Paulo 10, 215–217.Google Scholar