Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:16:05.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The proportion of liver excised in Algerian abattoirs is not a good indicator of Fasciola hepatica infections in local cattle breeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2024

A. Mekroud
Affiliation:
Département des Sciences Vétérinaires, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Constantine, 25000 Constantine, Algeria:
A. Titi
Affiliation:
Abattoir de Constantine, 25000 Constantine, Algeria:
A. Benakhla
Affiliation:
Département Vétérinaire, Centre Universitaire d'El Tarf, 36000 El Tarf, Algeria:
D. Rondelaud*
Affiliation:
UPRES EA 3174/USC INRA, Faculté de Médecine, 87025 Limoges, France
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: 33 555 435893 E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Clinical and serological investigations on 175 cattle were carried out in 1999 at the slaughterhouse of Jijel, northeastern Algeria, to verify if partial ablation of a liver infected with Fasciola hepatica represents a good epidemiological indicator in the case of fasciolosis, as partial excision of the liver is widespread throughout North African countries. This study was also performed to determine if there is a direct relationship between the quantity of liver confiscated for fasciolosis and the serological response of slaughtered animals. A significant relationship between highly infected livers and positive serological titres was noted. However, two groups of results were conflicting: the presence of macroscopically healthy, undamaged livers with a positive serology (8.3% of 120 cattle), or the existence of highly damaged livers with a negative serology (13.0% of 31 cattle). These results indicate that partial removal of the liver in the case of fasciolosis is unreliable, so this method does not represent a good tool to establish epidemiological data on this disease.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

References

Behm, C.A. & Sangster, N.C. (1999) Pathology, pathophysiology and clinical aspects. pp. 185224 in Dalton, J.P. (Ed.) Fasciolosis. Wallingford, Oxon, CAB International.Google Scholar
Boulard, C., Carreras, F. & Van Gool, F. (1995) Evaluation of nitroxynil and closantel activity using ELISA and eggs counts against Fasciola hepatica in experimentally and naturally infected cattle. Veterinary Research 26, 249255.Google ScholarPubMed
Chauvin, A. (1994) Réponses immunitaires locales et générales chez le mouton infesté expérimentalement par Fasciola hepatica Linné 1758. 155 pp. Doctorate thesis, Tours.Google Scholar
Chauvin, A. & Boulard, C. (1992) Le diagnostic de la fasciolose des ruminants: interprétation et utilisation pratique. Bulletin des Groupements Techniques Vétérinaires 418, 6973.Google Scholar
Chauvin, A., Moreau, E. & Boulard, C. (2001) Responses of Fasciola hepatica infected sheep in various infected levels. Veterinary Research 32, 8792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levieux, D., Levieux, A., Mage, C. & Garel, J.P. (1992) Immunological detection of chemotherapeutic success in bovine fasciolosis using the specific antigens f2. Veterinary Parasitology 45, 8188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Moreno, A., Jimenez, V., Martinez-Cruz, M.S., Martinez-Moreno, F.J., Becerra, C. & Hernandez, S. (1997) Triclabendazole treatment in experimental goat fasciolosis: anthelmintic efficacy and influence in antibody response and pathophysiology of the disease. Veterinary Parasitology 68, 5767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mekroud, A., Benakhla, A., Vignoles, P., Rondelaud, D. & Dreyfuss, G. (2004) Preliminary studies on the prevalences of natural fasciolosis in cattle, sheep, and the host snail (Galba truncatula) in northeastern Algeria. Parasitology Research 92: 502505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stat-Itcf, (1988) Manuel d'utilisation. 210 pp. Institut Technique des Céreéales et des Fourrages, Service des Etudes Statistiques, Boigneville.Google Scholar