Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:52:44.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the Bell technique, a modified Kato thick smear technique, and a digestion method for the field diagnosis of schistosomiasis mansoni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

C. H. Teesdale  and
M. A. Amin
C. H. Teesdale
Affiliation:
Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Khartoum, Sudan
M. A. Amin
Affiliation:
Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, University of Khartoum, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A modification of the Kato thick smear technique, the Bell filtration technique, and a digestion method were investigated to determine the relative merits of each for the detection of schistosome eggs in human faecal samples. The modified Kato technique was the method of choice because it was sensitive, simple to perform, and suitable for field use. The Bell filtration technique was equally sensitive in detecting light infections, but was more tedious and more complicated to perform than the thick smear technique.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 17 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, D.R. (1963) A new method for counting S. mansoni eggs in faeces. With special reference to therapeutic trials. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 29, 525–530.Google Scholar
Borda, C.E. and Pellegrino, J. (1971) An improved thick smear technique for quantitative diagnosis of Schistosoma mansoni infection. Revista Institute Medicate Tropicale, Sao Paulo, 13, 71–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Bradford, hill A. (1971) Principles of Medical Statistics (9th Edition), Ch 11,133–142.Google Scholar
Kato, K. and Miura, M. (1954) Comparative examinations. Japanese Journal of Parasitology, 3, 5 (as referred to by Borda and Pellegrino, (1971)).Google Scholar
Katz, N., Chaves, A. and Pellegrino, J. (1972) A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in schistosomiasis mansoni. Revista Institute Medicale Tropicale, Sao Paulo, 14, 397–400.Google ScholarPubMed
Layrisse, M., Martinez, C.T. and Ferrer, H.F. (1969) A simple volumetric device for preparing stool samples in cellophane thick smear technique. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 18, 553–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L.K. and Beaver, P.C. (1968) Evaluation of Kato thick smear technique for quantitative diagnosis of helminth infections. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 17, 382–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, N.R. and Hausheer, W.C. (1926) Concerning two options in dilution egg counting techniques, small drop, and displacement American Journal of Hygiene, 6, 134–145.Google Scholar