Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-fxdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:06:02.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Redescription of the Male of Troglostrongylus subcrenatus (Railliet and Henry, 1913) n.comb., from the Domestic Gat and the Synonymy of Bronchostrongylus Cameron, 1931 with Troglostrongylus Vevers, 1923

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

W. M. Fitzsimmons
W. M. Fitzsimmons
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Field Station, Compton, Berks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A short historical study of this species is followed by a redescription from a male specimen which provides further details of head and bursa and of the structure of the spicules. The spicules are considered to be of considerable taxonomic importance at the generic level. The presence or absence of certain other significant morphological features is confirmed, for example, the presence of a cervical cuticular inflation and the absence of a gubernaculum. A new host and a new geographical locality are recorded. Finally some notes on the genera Troglostrongylus Vevers, 1923 and Bronchostrongylus Cameron, 1931 attempt to explain why the writer considers that the latter genus is superfluous and could be suppressed. A key to the species of the genus Troglostrongylus (sensu lato), a list of species and synonyms, and a bibliography are given. An amended generic diagnosis is proposed.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 38 , Issue 1-2 , June 1964 , pp. 11 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, T. W. M., 1931.—“On some lungworms of the Malay tiger.” J. Helminth., 9, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, E. C., 1949.—“A list of the Trichostrongylid lungworms (Phylum Nematoda) and a Key to the six genera.” Parasitology, 39, 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, E. C., 1951.—“A further revision in the classification of the family Metastrongylidae Leiper [1909] (Phylum Nematoda).” Parasitology., 41, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerichter, C. B., 1949.—“Studies on the nematodes parasitic in the lungs of Felidae in Palestine.” Parasitology., 39, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Railliet, A. and Henry, A., 1913.—“Un Haemostrongylus des branches du Léopard.” Bull. Soc. Pat. exot., 6, 451–454.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, L. and Stough, B. D., 1950.—“Troglostrongylus wilsoni (Stough, 1953) n.comb. (Nematoda: Mctastrongylidac) from the lungs of the bobcat, Lynx rufus rufus.” J. Parasit., 42, 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stough, B. D., 1953.—“A new lungworm parasite from the bobcat, Lynx rufus rufus.” J. Tenn. Acad. Sci., 28, 189.Google Scholar
Travassos, L., 1946.—“Sobre urn Metastrongylidae das cavidades nasais de Didelphis marsupialis aurita Wicd.” Rev. bras. Biol., 6, 490–502.Google Scholar
Vevers, G.M., 1923.—“On the parasitic nematoda collected from mammalia which died in the Gardens of the Zoological Society of London during the years 1919–1921; with a description of three new genera and three new species.” Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., (1922), 901–919.Google Scholar