Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2015
Modern writers have generally assumed that the political affiliations of Aeschylus were aristocratic. That his sympathies were with the democrats has, however, been ably maintained by Sir R. W. Livingstone on the basis of a consideration of the Eumenides, a play which explicitly exalts the aristocratic court of the Areopagus, and has usually been taken as proof of Aeschylus' opposition to the democratic measures of Ephialtes and Pericles. Livingstone bases his argument upon the eloquent enthusiasm of the poet for Athens' future, and upon the fact that the functions assigned the Areopagus in the play are those which it still retained after the democratic reforms of Ephialtes, not those of which it had been despoiled.
1 ‘The Problem of the Eumenides of Aeschylus,’ JHS. XLV, 120 ff.
2 976 ff.
3 Thucydides, I, 125 and 127.
4 Herodotus, V, 70; Thucydides, I, 126.
5 He further says that Athena's ground for acquittal had not been advanced by Apollo, or by Orestes in his own behalf. But Apollo's words, 658 ff., clearly refute this point.
6 680 ff.
7 984 ff.