Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:02:11.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bringing Asia to the world: Indian trade unionism and the long road towards the Asiatic Labour Congress, 1919–37*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2012

Carolien Stolte
Carolien Stolte*
Affiliation:
Institute for History, University of Leiden, P.O. Box 9500, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers Asianism in the Indian trade union movement, against the backdrop of increasing international cooperation between Asian trade union movements in the interwar period, which culminated in the short-lived Asiatic Labour Congress (1934–37). It demonstrates how Asianist enthusiasm both propelled and hampered Indian workers’ representation at the International Labour Organization and other international bodies. Finally, it considers Asianism as a crucial characteristic of Indian trade unionism in the interwar period, by showing how the All-India Trade Union Congress, once the hope of Indian labour as an organized force, split into rival federations over the issue of its Asian affiliations.

Keywords

AsianismInternational Labour OrganizationinterwarSouth Asiatrade unionism
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Global History , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 257 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, among others, Sugata Bose, A hundred horizons: the Indian Ocean in the age of global empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006Google Scholar; Erez Manela, The Wilsonian moment: self-determination and the international origins of anti-colonialism, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009Google Scholar; and Sugata Bose and Kris Manjapra, eds., Cosmopolitan thought zones: South Asia and the global circulation of ideas, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010Google Scholar.

2 These examples refer to a meeting of Indian revolutionaries in Paris in 1909, the Congress of the Peoples of the East in Baku in 1920, and the Pan-Asiatic Conference in Nagasaki in 1926 respectively. See, among others, Çemil Aydin, The politics of anti-Westernism: visions of world order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian thought, New York: Columbia University Press, 2007Google Scholar; John Riddell, ed., To see the dawn: Baku, 1920 – first congress of the peoples of the East, New York: Pathfinder, 1993Google Scholar; Birendra Prasad, Indian nationalism and Asia (1900–1947), New Delhi: B.R. Publishing, 1979Google Scholar.

3 Frey, Marc and Spakowski, Nicola, ‘Asianismen seit dem 19. Jahrhundert: “Asien” als Gegenstand nationaler und transnationaler Diskurse und Pratiken’, Comparativ, 18, 6, 2008, p. 7Google Scholar.

4 For analysis of this particular discourse see, among others, Mark Frost, ‘ “That great ocean of idealism”: Calcutta, the Tagore Circle and the Idea of Asia, 1900–1920’, in Shanti Moorthy and Ashraf Jamal, eds., Indian Ocean studies: cultural, social, and political perspectives, London: Routledge, 2010, pp. 251–279Google Scholar; Stolte, Carolien and Fischer-Tiné, Harald, ‘Imagining India in Asia: nationalism and internationalism (ca. 1905–1940)’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 54, 1, 2012, pp. 65–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 On developmental initiatives, see Benjamin Zachariah, Developing India, 1930–1950, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003Google Scholar.

6 In this way, this study connects to a recent historiographical trend, which has seen a move away from Asianist projects as top-down processes. See Mark, Ethan, ‘ “Asia's” transwar lineage: nationalism, Marxism, and “Greater Asia” in an Indonesian inflection’, Journal of Asian Studies, 65, 3, 2006, pp. 461–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sven Saaler and Christopher Szpilman, ‘Introduction’, in Sven Saaler and Christopher Szpilman, eds., Pan-Asianism: a documentary history, vol. 1: 1850–1920, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011Google Scholar; Maia Ramnath, Haj to utopia: how the Ghadar movement charted global radicalism and attempted to overthrow the British empire, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2011Google Scholar, esp. pp. 123–65.

7 Legg, Stephen, ‘Of scales, networks and assemblages: the League of Nations apparatus and the scalar sovereignty of the Government of India’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2009, p. 240Google Scholar.

8 The concept of an Asian renaissance was liberally used by actors collaborating in international organizations, not least by Taraknath Das: see Das, Taraknath, ‘Pan Asianism, Asian independence and world peace’, Modern Review, January 1929, pp. 44–52Google Scholar.

9 On the Manchurian incident and the League of Nations, see Rana Mitter, The Manchurian myth: nationalism, resistance, and collaboration in modern China, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000, esp. pp. 164–166Google Scholar; Akira Iriye, China and Japan in the global setting, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, pp. 81–88Google Scholar. On the inclusion of the Soviet Union in the League and its impact on regional power alignments, see J. Hochman, The Soviet Union and the failure of collective security, 1934–1938, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984Google Scholar; R. H. Haigh, D. S. Morris, and A. R. Peters, Soviet foreign policy, the League of Nations and Europe, 1917–1939, Aldershot: Gower, 1986Google Scholar.

10 On the All-India Trade Union Congress, see Gopal Ghosh, Indian trade union movement, Kolkata: People's History Publication, 2005Google Scholar; Shiva Chandra Jha, The Indian trade union movement: an account and an interpretation, Calcutta: K.L. Mukhopadhyay, 1970Google Scholar; N. Pattabhi Raman, Political involvement of India's trade unions: a case study of the anatomy of the political labor movement in Asia, New York: Asia Publishing House, 1967Google Scholar; Harold Crouch, Trade unions and politics in India, Bombay: Manaktalas, 1966Google Scholar; B. L. Mehta, Trade Union Movement in India, New Delhi: Kanishka Publishing House, 1991Google Scholar; Prem Sagar Gupta, A short history of the All-India Trade Union Congress, New Delhi: AITUC, 1980Google Scholar.

11 Willem van Schendel, ‘Stretching labour historiography: pointers from South Asia’, in Rana Behal and Marcel van der Linden, eds., Coolies, capital, and colonialism: studies in Indian labour history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 229–262Google Scholar.

12 Rajnarayan Chandavarkar, Imperial power and popular politics: class, resistance and the state in India, ca. 1850–1950, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, 74Google Scholar.

13 Dipesh Chakrabarty, Rethinking working-class history: Bengal, 1890–1940, New Delhi: Oxford University Press 1989, p. 152Google Scholar. On the influence of reformist ideals on trade union leadership, see also Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘Sasipada Banerjee: a study in the nature of the first contact of the Bengal bhadralok with the working class of Bengal’, Indian Historical Review, 2, 2, 1976, pp. 339–364Google Scholar.

14 British Library, India Office Records, L/PJ/12/166, copy of an untitled 1923 pamphlet by Taraknath Das.

15 AITUC Bulletin, July 1929, p. 5.

16 Hell, Stefan, ‘Siam and the League of Nations: modernization, sovereignty and multilateral diplomacy, 1920–1940’, PhD thesis, Leiden University, 2007, p. 54Google Scholar.

17 On Japan, see Tomo Akami, Internationalizing the Pacific: the United States, Japan and the Institute of Pacific Relations, 1919–1945, New York: Routledge, 2004Google Scholar, esp. ch. 1; Akami, Tomo, ‘Between the state and global civil society: non-official experts and their network in Asia and the Pacific, 1925–45’, Global Networks, 2, 1, 2002, pp. 65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Purushottama Pillai and Lakshminiwas Birla, India and the ILO, Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1945, p. 32Google Scholar.

19 On the conventions in question, see International Labour Organization, International Labour Conventions and Recommendations (1919–1981), Geneva: International Labour Office, 1982, pp. 703, 715–16, 744. On Indian ratification, see B. D. Rawat, India in ILO, Jaipur: RBSA Publishers, 1990, pp. 334–335Google Scholar.

20 Pillai and Birla, India and the ILO, p. 12Google Scholar.

21 Ibid.

22 AITUC Bulletin, July 1929, p. 5.

23 Irvin, Warren, ‘Labor conference of American states’, Monthly Labor Review, 43, 2, 1936Google Scholar.

24 National Archives of India (henceforth NAI), Dept of Industries and Labour, Labour Branch, L-1779(1), 1932, Proposal of the ILO to convene an Asiatic Labour Conference.

25 Benedict Anderson, The spectre of comparisons: nationalism, Southeast Asia and the world, New York: Verso, 1998, pp. 73–74Google Scholar.

26 Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (henceforth NMML), AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, speech by N. M. Joshi.

27 AITUC Bulletin, January 1929, p. 81, ‘Memorandum’.

28 AITUC Bulletin, December 1928, p. 74, Report of the ninth session, resolution 19.

29 See, inter alia, Geert van Goethem, De Internationale van Amsterdam: de wereld van het Internationaal Vakverbond, 1913–1945, Antwerp: Houtekiet, 2003Google Scholar; Tosstorff, Reiner, ‘Moscow versus Amsterdam: reflections on the history of the Profintern’, Labour History Review, 68, 1, 2003, pp. 79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Gupta, A short history, p. 30Google Scholar.

31 West Bengal State Archives Calcutta (henceforth WBSA), Police files, 166/22 file 249/22, Weekly report, 24 August 1922.

32 Ibid.

33 On M. N. Roy, see Kris Manjapra, M. N. Roy: Marxism and colonial cosmopolitanism, New Delhi: Routledge, 2010Google Scholar. On Roy's involvement with the trade union movement, see Dipti Kumar Roy, Trade union movement in India: the role of M. N. Roy, Calcutta: Minerva Associates, 1990Google Scholar.

34 Roy, Trade union movement, p. 8Google Scholar; Manjapra, M. N. Roy, pp. 83–84Google Scholar.

35 WBSA, Police Files, 35/26, file 248/26: ‘Note on the development of the AITUC and its capture by the Communists’. By 1927, Dange was an assistant secretary of AITUC and Thengdi was one of three vice-presidents. See Roy, Trade union movement, p. 19Google Scholar.

36 On the differences between RILU and IFTU on the question of colonialism, see Willy Buschak, ‘Internationaler Gewerschaftsbewegung in Kolonien und halbkolonialen Ländern’, in Friedhelm Boll, ed., Gewerkschaftsbewegung im 20. Jahrhundert im Vergleich, Bochum: Ruhr-Universität, 1985, pp. 34–55Google Scholar; Tosstorff, ‘Moscow versus Amsterdam’, p. 82Google Scholar.

37 Gangadhar Adhikari, ed., Documents of the history of the Communist Party of India, vol. II: 1923–1925, New Delhi: People's Publishing House, 1974, pp. 77–78Google Scholar.

38 This was mainly due to the close personal friendship between the organizations’ leaders, Albert Thomas (ILO) and Jan Oudegeest (IFTU). See van Goethem, De Internationale van Amsterdam, p. 129Google Scholar.

39 WBSA, Police Files, Serial no. 49, file 248/36, ‘Extract from the report on the political situation and labour unrest for the week ending the 31st of January 1924’.

40 Ibid.

41 Van Goethem, De Internationale van Amsterdam, p. 50Google Scholar.

42 Roy, Trade union movement, p. 21Google Scholar.

43 Minocheher Rustom Masani, The Communist Party of India, New York: Macmillian, 1954, p. 51Google Scholar.

44 WBSA, Police Files, Serial no. 49, file 248/36, Secret Report, 24 March 1927.

45 International Institute for Social History (henceforth IISH), League Against Imperialism Archives (henceforth LAIA), file 28, Joint resolution by the Asian delegations. On the League Against Imperialism, see Louro, Michele, ‘Rethinking Nehru's internationalism: the League Against Imperialism and anti-imperial networks, 1927–1936’, Third Frame: Literature, Culture and Society, 2, 3, 2009, pp. 79–94Google Scholar; Vijay Prashad, The darker nations: a people's history of the Third World, New York: The New Press, 2007, pp. 16–30Google Scholar; Jean Jones, The League Against Imperialism, Fulwood, Lancs.: Socialist History Society, 1996Google Scholar.

46 The AITUC had affiliated itself to the League Against Imperialism for the duration of one year, as a protest against the detention of the League representative M. Johnston, as per Resolution 20a of the 1928 Jharia meeting. See NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress: Report of the 9th Session.

47 IISH, LAIA, file 2, List of delegations.

48 Seeley Mudd Manuscript Library, Princeton University, Baldwin papers, box 8, folder 3, Nehru to Baldwin, 26 January 1928.

49 On the PPTUS, see Fowler, Josephine, ‘From East to West and West to East: ties of solidarity in the Pan-Pacific revolutionary trade union movement, 1923–1934’, International Labour and Working Class History, 66, 2004, pp. 99–117Google Scholar; Farrell, Frank, ‘Australian labour and the Profintern’, International Review of Social History, 24, 1, 1979, pp. 34–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Mehta, Trade union movement, 140Google Scholar; Gupta, A short history, 112Google Scholar.

51 WBSA, Police Files, 35/26 file 248/26, ‘Note on the Development of the AITUC’.

52 NAI, Home Political Records, File 1927 37/I, ‘Disclosure of telegrams emanating from objectionable foreign sources to the Director of Intelligence Bureau’. Interception was rarely completely successful.

53 Xenia Eudin and Robert North, Soviet Russia and the East, 1920–1927: a documentary survey, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957, p. 268Google Scholar.

54 WBSA, Police Files, Serial no. 49, file 248/36, ‘Draft propaganda thesis on the Pan-Pacific Labour Conference’.

55 On the Meerut case, see Lester Hutchinson, Conspiracy at Meerut, London: Allen & Unwin, 1935Google Scholar; Dhanagare, D. N., ‘The politics of survival: peasant organizations and the left wing in India, 1925–1946’, Sociological Bulletin, 24, 1, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pramita Gosh, The Meerut Conspiracy case and the left-wing in India, Calcutta: Papyrus, 1978Google Scholar; The Meerut prisoners and the charge against them, London: Modern Books, 1931.

56 Gupta, A short history, p. 151Google Scholar.

57 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, Report of the 9th Session. The letter was signed by, among others, N. M. Joshi, Diwan Chamanlal, V. V. Giri, B. Shiva Rao, and S. C. Joshi. V. V. Giri became the first president of the seceding federation.

58 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, R. R. Bakhale to Yonekubo, 7 March 1930.

59 Ibid., Yonekubo to R. R. Bakhale, 9 April 1930.

60 George Totten, The social democratic movement in prewar Japan, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966, p. 274Google Scholar.

61 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, Preliminary meeting in Bombay.

62 The latter could have supplied them if they had been so inclined. For instance, Indonesian trade unions had already applied for IFTU membership. See IISH, IFTU Archives, file 91, ‘Note on the demands of the PVPN’, 1932. Several Indonesian unions had federated in 1919, with the communists seceding in 1921 and a workers’ representatives for the Dutch East Indies had attended the ILO Conference of 1929. See R. C. Kwantes, De ontwikkeling van de nationalistische beweging in Nederlandsch-Indië, Groningen: Nederlands Historisch Genootschap, 1975Google Scholar.

63 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, Ceylon WFPA to NTUF, 10 October 1929.

64 NAI, Dept of Industries and Labour, Labour Branch, 1932 file no. L-1779(1), Proposal of the ILO to convene an Asiatic Labour Conference.

65 Akira Iriye, The origins of the Second World War in Asia and the Pacific, New York: Longman, 1987, p. 10Google Scholar.

66 Hell, ‘Siam’, p. 49.

67 For Persia's international engagements in this period, see Stephanie Cronin, ed., The making of modern Iran: state and society under Riza Shah, 1921–1941, London: Routledge, 2003, esp. pp. 82–102Google Scholar.

68 On the ideological leanings of the respective Asian trade union movements, see Raman, Political involvement, pp. 174–191Google Scholar; Stan Awbery and Frederick Dalley, Labour and trade union organization in the federation of Malaya and Singapore, Kuala Lumpur: Government Report, 1948, p. 24Google Scholar.

69 Iriye, Origins, p. 9Google Scholar.

70 Robert Taylor, The state in Myanmar, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Press, 2009, p. 199Google Scholar; Egreteau, Renauld, ‘Burmese Indians in contemporary Burma: heritage, influence and perception since 1988’, Asian Ethnicity, 12, 1, 2011, p. 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On anti-Indian riots in Southeast Asia in this period, see S. R. Sudhamani, ‘Indians in Southeast Asia: an approach paper’, in I. J. Bahadur Singh, ed., Indians in Southeast Asia, New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1982, pp. 8–22Google Scholar; Kaul, Man Mohini, ‘Indians in Southeast Asia: the colonial period and its impact’, in ibid., pp. 23–33Google Scholar.

71 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, minutes of the first session. On Kikukawa and Suzuki, see Stephen Large, Organized workers and socialist politics in interwar Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, pp. 163Google Scholar, 184; Janet Hunter, Japanese economic history 1930–1960, vol. 5: industrial labour in Japan, New York: Routledge, 2000 (reprint), p. 107; Sheldon Garon, The state and labor in modern Japan, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987, p. 108Google Scholar; Vera Mackie, Creating socialist women in Japan: gender, labour and activism, 1900–1937, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 132Google Scholar.

72 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, Minutes of the first session.

73 Ibid., speech by the Hon. Mr. Peri Sundaram.

74 Ibid.

75 For a detailed analysis of this issue, see Matthias van Rossem, Hand aan hand (blank en bruin): solidariteit en de werking van globalisering, etniciteit en klasse onder zeelieden op de Nederlandse koopvaardij, 1900–1945, Amsterdam: Aksant, 2009, esp. chs. 7–8Google Scholar.

76 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, speech by the Hon. Mr. Peri Sundaram.

77 The Trade Union Record, May and June 1934, p. 10.

78 Ibid.

79 On the Temporary Slavery Commission, see Suzanne Miers, Slavery in the twentieth century: the evolution of a global problem, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira, 2003Google Scholar; Bales, Kevin and Robbins, Peter, ‘ “No one shall be held in slavery or servitude”: a critical analysis of international slavery agreements and concepts of slavery’, Human Rights Review, 2, 2, 2001, pp. 18–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Suzanne Miers, ‘Slavery and the slave trade as international issues, 1890–1930’, in Suzanne Miers and Martin Klein, eds., Slavery and colonial rule in Africa, London: Frank Cass, 1990, pp. 16–37Google Scholar.

81 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, ‘To the editors of newspapers’, 20 May 1935.

82 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, Dov Hos, Secretary of the General Federation of Jewish Labour, to Bakhale, 27 January 1935; Bakhale to Dov Hos, 4 July 1935.

83 Bombay Chronicle, 25 May 1934.

84 Ibid.

85 Times of India, 19 May 1934.

86 The Hindu, 12 May 1934.

87 Ibid.

88 Friedman, Irving, ‘Indian nationalism and the Far East’, Pacific Affairs, 13, 1, 1940, p. 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stolte and Fischer-Tiné, ‘Imagining Asia’.

89 NMML, AITUC Archive, Asiatic Labour Congress, S. S. Fushimi Maru to N. M. Joshi, 17 May 1934.

90 Times of Ceylon, 10 May 1934.

91 Ibid.

92 Ibid.

93 See Manela, The Wilsonian moment; Jay Winter, Dreams of peace and freedom: utopian moments in the twentieth century, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006Google Scholar; also the editorial and contributions to this special issue.

94 Indian Labour Journal, 1 August 1937.

95 Ibid.

96 Large, Organized workers, p. 184.

97 Indian Labour Journal, 1 August 1937.

98 Ibid.

99 Ibid.

100 Garon, The state, p. 108Google Scholar.

101 Mackie, Creating socialist women, p. 132Google Scholar.

102 Large, Organized workers, p. 164Google Scholar.

103 Prasad, Indian nationalism, pp. 150–158Google Scholar.

104 Indian Labour Journal, 10 May 1937, 2, ‘The ILO and colonial territories’.

105 Indian Labour Journal, 27 June 1937, 1, ‘Comrade Naidu champions Indian workers in Geneva’.

106 Indian Labour Journal, 11 July 1937, 5, Plea for Asiatic Labour Conference; Indian workers’ delegate's speech at the ILO Conference.

107 Ibid.

108 Indian Labour Journal, 26 December 1937, 1, ‘Presidential address at the third session of NTUF’.

109 Labour Forum New Delhi, Planning for labour: a symposium on the occasion of the Preparatory Asian Regional Conference of the ILO held in New Delhi, October–November 1947, Bangalore: Labour Publications Trust, 1947, p. xvi.

110 Ibid., p. xvii. India, a non-sovereign member since 1919, was the longstanding exception.

111 International Labour Office, The ILO and Asia: the work of the Preparatory Asian Regional Conference (New Delhi, October–November 1947), Geneva: ILO, 1948, p. 11.

112 Ibid., pp. 22–3.

113 Victor Silverman, Imagining internationalism in American and British labor, 1939–49, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2000, p. 2Google Scholar.

114 Sobhag Mathur, Spectrum of Nehru's thought, New Delhi: Mitthal Publications, 1994Google Scholar; Jaffrelot, Christophe, ‘India's look-East policy: an Asianist strategy in perspective’, India Review, 2, 2, 2003, pp. 35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and most recently Singh, Sinderpal, ‘From Delhi to Bandung: Nehru, “Indian-ness” and “Pan-Asian-ness” ’, Journal of South Asian Studies, 30, 1, 2011, pp. 51–64Google Scholar.