Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:49:55.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use/non-use of ne in the spoken French of university-level learners of French as a second language in the Canadian context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2010

KATHERINE REHNER
KATHERINE REHNER*
Affiliation:
Department of Language Studies, University of Toronto Mississauga
*
Address for correspondence: Katherine Rehner, Program in Linguistics, Department of Language Studies, University of Toronto, Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Room 249 North Building, Mississauga, ON, CanadaL5L 1C6 email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a sociolinguistic analysis of ne use/non-use in the spoken French of learners of French as a second language enrolled in their first or fourth year of undergraduate studies in a bilingual university in Ontario, Canada. Specifically, it examines the impact of various linguistic and extra-linguistic factors on the students’ use of the variants and compares the patterns found to previous research on ne use/non-use among Ontario high school FSL learners and on other sociolinguistic variables in the speech of the same university FSL learners under study here. The paper concludes that while many of the same influences are at work in the speech of both the university and high school learners, the precise influences appear to be modified with continued study and that many of these patterns are similar across variables within the university FSL learners’ speech.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , November 2010 , pp. 289 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, H. (1988). Variation Theory and Second Language Acquisition. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. (1981). The loss of the negative particle ne in French: A syntactic change in progress. Language, 57.3: 674–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M. (1998). MonoConcPro (Version 1.0) [computer software]. Houston, Texas: Athelstan.Google Scholar
Bayley, R. and Regan, V. (2004). Introduction: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8.3: 393–338.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. (1988). Issues in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Blondeau, H. (2001). Real time changes in the paradigm of personal pronouns in Montreal French. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5.4: 453–474.Google Scholar
Blondeau, H. and Nagy, N. (1998). Double marquage du sujet dans le français parlé par les jeunes anglo-montréalais. In: Jensen, J. and Van Herk, G. (eds), Actes du congrès annuel de l'Association canadienne de linguistique. Ottawa: Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
Dessureault-Dober, D. (1974). Étude sociolinguistique de /(ça) fait que/: ‘coordonnant logique’ et ‘marqueur d'interaction’. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2002). Using sociostylistic variants in advanced French interlanguage. EUROSLA Yearbook, 2: 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. and Regan, V. (2002). Maîtriser la norme sociolinguistique en interlangue française: le cas de l'omission variable de ne. Journal of French Language Studies, 12.2: 123–148.Google Scholar
Dickerson, L. (1974). Internal and external patterning of phonological variability in the speech of Japanese learners of English: Toward a theory of second language acquisition. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9.1: 1–20.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1999). Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation. Applied Linguistics, 20.4: 460–480.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E. (1978). Patterned phonetic variability in second language speech: A gradual diffusion model. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 34.3: 335–347.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1983). Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 35.1: 141–163.Google Scholar
Laberge, S. (1977). Étude de la variation des pronoms définis et indéfinis dans le français parlé à Montréal. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15.3: 263–287.Google Scholar
Major, R. C. (2004). Gender and stylistic variation in second language phonology. Language Variation and Change, 16.2: 169–188.Google Scholar
Mougeon, F. and Rehner, K. (2008). Identity and nativelikeness in bilingual FSL learners. In: Collier, P. (ed.), Modern French Identities. Cambridge: Peter Lang, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
Mougeon, F. and Rehner, K. (2009). From grade school to university: The variable use of on/nous by university FSL students. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66.2: 269–297.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R. and Beniak, , É. (1991). Linguistic Consequences of Language Contact and Restriction: The Case of French in Ontario. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T. and Rehner, K. (2002). État de la recherche sur l'appropriation de la variation par les apprenants avancés du FL2 ou FLE. In: Dewaele, J.-M. and Mougeon, R. (eds), L'acquisition de la variation par les apprenants du français langue seconde, Special issue of Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 17: 7–50.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T. and Rehner, K. (2009). Évolution de l'usage des conjonctions et locutions de conséquence par les adolescents franco-ontariens de Hawkesbury et de Pembroke (1978–2005). In: Martineau, F., Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T., and Tremblay, M. (eds), Le français d'ici: études linguistiques et sociolinguistiques sur la variation du français au Québec et en Ontario. Toronto: Éditions du GREF, pp. 145–184.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., Nadasdi, T. and Rehner, K. (2010). The Sociolinguistic Competence of French Immersion Students. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., Rehner, K. and Nadasdi, T. (2004). The learning of spoken French variation by Immersion students from Toronto, Canada. In: Bayley, R. and Regan, V. (eds), Journal of Sociolinguistics: Special Issue, 8.3: 408–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadasdi, T., Mougeon, R. and Rehner, K. (2005). Learning to speak everyday (Canadian) French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61.4: 543–563.Google Scholar
Regan, V. (1996). Variation in French interlanguage: A longitudinal study of sociolinguistic competence. In: Bayley, R. and Preston, D. R. (eds), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 177–201.Google Scholar
Regan, V. (2004). The relationship between the group and the individual and the acquisition of native speaker variation patterns: A preliminary study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42.4: 335–348.Google Scholar
Regan, V. (2005). From speech community back to classroom: What variation analysis can tell us about the role of context in the acquisition of French as a foreign language. In: Dewaele, J.-M. (ed.), Focus on French as a Foreign Language: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 191–209.Google Scholar
Regan, V., Howard, M. and Lemee, I. (2009). The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Competence in a Study Abroad Context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehner, K. (2002). The development of aspects of linguistic and discourse competence by advanced second language learners of French. Unpublished PhD dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Rehner, K. (2004). Developing Aspects of Second Language Discourse Competence. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Rehner, K. and Beaulieu, N. (2008). The use of expressions of consequence by core and immersion French graduates in a bilingual university setting. Mosaic: The Journal for Language Teachers, 10.2: 13–19.Google Scholar
Rehner, K. and Mougeon, R. (1999). Variation in the spoken French of immersion students: To ne or not to ne, that is the sociolinguistic question. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56.1: 124–154.Google Scholar
Rehner, K. and Mougeon, R. (2003). The effect of educational input on the development of sociolinguistic competence by French immersion students: The case of expressions of consequences in spoken French. The Journal of Educational Thought, 37.3: 259–281.Google Scholar
Rehner, K., Mougeon, R. and Nadasdi, T. (2003). The learning of sociostylistic variation by advanced FSL learners: The case of nous versus on in immersion French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25: 127–156.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., Lawrence, H. and Tagliamonte, S. (2001). Goldvarb 2001: A multivariate analysis application for Windows. [computer software] University of York, Department of Language and Linguistic Science.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. and Vincent, D. (1980). The productive use of ne in spoken Montreal French. In: Sankoff, G. (ed.), The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 295–310.Google Scholar
Sandy, S. (1997). L'emploi variable de la particule négative ne dans le parler des Franco- Ontariens adolescents. Unpublished MA thesis, York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
Sax, K. (2003). Acquisition of stylistic variation by American learners of French. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Indiana.Google Scholar
Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. (1990). Aspects of the sociolinguistic performance of early and later French Immersion students. In: Scarcella, R.C., Anderson, E.S., and Krashen, S. D. (eds), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. New York: Newbury House, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in Interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1990). On variation in interlanguage: A response to Gregg. Applied Linguistics, 11.4: 392–400.Google Scholar
Thibault, P. and Sankoff, G. (1997). The insertion of a second language into the community repertoire: Anglophone French in Montreal. Paper presented at NWAVE-26, Université Laval.Google Scholar
Young, R. and Bayley, R. (1996). VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In: Bayley, R. and Preston, D. R. (eds), Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 253–306.Google Scholar