Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:48:35.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subsonic flow past localised heating elements in boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2017

A. F. Aljohani
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
J. S. B. Gajjar*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The problem of subsonic flow past micro-electro-mechanical-system-type (MEMS-type) heating elements placed on a flat surface, where the MEMS devices have hump-shaped surfaces, is investigated using triple-deck theory. The compressible Navier–Stokes equations supplemented by the energy equation are considered in the limit that the Reynolds number is large. The triple-deck problem is formulated, and the linear and nonlinear analysis and results are presented. The current work is a generalisation of the problem discussed by Koroteev & Lipatov (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 707, 2012, pp. 595–605; Z. Angew. Math. Mech., vol. 77, 2013, pp. 486–493), where the MEMS devices have flat-shaped surfaces. The results show that the hump-shaped heating elements enhance large drops in pressure, and peaks and troughs in the skin friction over the centre of the hump compared with the flat-shaped devices, which may be useful for controlling the flow.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aljohani, A. F.2016 Applications of triple deck theory to study the flow over localised heating elements in boundary layers. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Korolev, G. L., Gajjar, J. S. B. & Ruban, A. I. 2002 Once again on the supersonic flow separation near a corner. J. Fluid Mech. 463, 173199.Google Scholar
Koroteev, M. V. & Lipatov, I. I. 2012 Local temperature perturbations of the boundary layer in the regime of free viscousin–viscid interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 707, 595605.Google Scholar
Koroteev, M. V. & Lipatov, I. I. 2013 Steady subsonic boundary layer in domains of local surface heating. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 77, 486493.Google Scholar
Kravtsova, M. A., Zametaev, V. B. & Ruban, A. I. 2005 An effective numerical method for solving viscous–inviscid interaction problems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 363, 11571167.Google Scholar
Lipatov, I. I. 2006 Disturbed boundary layer flow with local time-dependent surface heating. Fluid Dyn. 41, 5565.Google Scholar
Logue, R. P.2008 Stability and bifurcations governed by the triple-deck and related equations. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Messiter, A. F. 1970 Boundary-layer flow near the trailing edge of a flat plate. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 18, 241257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiland, V. Y. 1969 Theory of laminar boundary layer separation in supersonic flow. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza 4, 5357.Google Scholar
Neiland, V. Y. 1971 The asymptotic theory of the interaction of a supersonic flow with a boundary layer. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Mekh. Zhidk. Gaza 4, 4147.Google Scholar
Rohatgi, A.2010 Webplotdigitizer. http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. 1973 Laminar flow past a small hump on a plate. J. Fluid Mech. 57, 803824.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. & Williams, P. G. 1969 Self-induced separation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 312, 181206.Google Scholar
Sychev, V. V., Ruban, A. I., Sychev, V. V. & Korolev, G. L. 1998 Asymptotic Theory of Separated Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Aljohani and Gajjar supplementary material

Aljohani and Gajjar supplementary material 1

Download Aljohani and Gajjar supplementary material(File)
File 263.6 KB