Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T16:46:08.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shear-layers in magnetohydrodynamic spherical Couette flow with conducting walls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2010

A. M. SOWARD  and
E. DORMY
A. M. SOWARD*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Research Institute, School of Engineering, Computer Science & Mathematics, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, North Park Road, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK
E. DORMY
Affiliation:
MHD in Astro- & Geophysics (ENS/IPGP) & CNRS, LRA, Département de Physique, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24, rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the steady axisymmetric motion of an electrically conducting fluid contained within a spherical shell and permeated by a centred axial dipole magnetic field, which is strong as measured by the Hartmann number M. Slow axisymmetric motion is driven by rotating the inner boundary relative to the stationary outer boundary. For M ≫ 1, viscous effects are only important in Hartmann boundary layers adjacent to the inner and outer boundaries and a free shear-layer on the magnetic field line that is tangent to the outer boundary on the equatorial plane of symmetry. We measure the ability to leak electric current into the solid boundaries by the size of their relative conductance ɛ. Since the Hartmann layers are sustained by the electric current flow along them, the current inflow from the fluid mainstream needed to feed them increases in concert with the relative conductance, because of the increasing fraction ℒ of the current inflow leaked directly into the solids. Therefore the nature of the flow is sensitive to the relative sizes of ɛ−1 and M.

The current work extends an earlier study of the case of a conducting inner boundary and an insulating outer boundary with conductance ɛo = 0 (Dormy, Jault & Soward, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 452, 2002, pp. 263–291) to other values of the outer boundary conductance. Firstly, analytic results are presented for the case of perfectly conducting inner and outer boundaries, which predict super-rotation rates Ωmax of order M1/2 in the free shear-layer. Successful comparisons are made with numerical results for both perfectly and finitely conducting boundaries. Secondly, in the case of a finitely conducting outer boundary our analytic results show that Ωmax is O(M1/2) for ɛo−1 ≪ 1 ≪ M3/4, O(ɛo2/3M1/2) for 1 ≪ ɛo−1 ≪ M3/4 and O(1) for 1 ≪ M3/4 ≪ ɛo−1. On increasing ɛo−1 from zero, substantial electric current leakage into the outer boundary, ℒo ≈ 1, occurs for ɛo−1 ≪ M3/4 with the shear-layer possessing the character appropriate to a perfectly conducting outer boundary. When ɛo−1 = O(M3/4) the current leakage is blocked near the equator, and the nature of the shear-layer changes. So, when M3/4 ≪ ɛo−1, the shear-layer has the character appropriate to an insulating outer boundary. More precisely, over the range M3/4 ≪ ɛo−1 ≪ M the blockage spreads outwards, reaching the pole when ɛo−1 = O(M). For M ≪ ɛo−1 current flow into the outer boundary is completely blocked, ℒo ≪ 1.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 645 , 25 February 2010 , pp. 145 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.Google Scholar
Bühler, L. 2009 On the origin of super rotating layers in magnetohydrodynamic flows. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00162-009-0111-z, online 1 July 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormy, E. 1997 Modélisation numérique de la dynamo terrestre. PhD thesis, I.P.G., Paris.Google Scholar
Dormy, E., Cardin, P. & Jault, D. 1998 MHD flow in a slightly differentially rotating spherical shell, with conducting inner core, in a dipolar magnetic field. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 160, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormy, E., Jault, D. & Soward, A. M. 2002 A super-rotating shear layer in magnetohydrodynamic spherical Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 452, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, V. C. A. 1937 Non-uniform rotation of the sun and its magnetic field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 97, 458–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garaud, P. & Guervilly, C. 2009 The rotation rate of the solar radiative zone. Astrophys. J. 695, 799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, J. 1937 Theory of the laminar flow of an electrically conductive liquid in a homogeneous magnetic field. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 15 (6), 1–28.Google Scholar
Hartmann, J. & Lazarus, F. 1937 Experimental investigations on the flow of mercury in a homogeneous magnetic field. K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd. 15 (7), 1–45.Google Scholar
Hollerbach, R. 2000 Magnetohydrodynamical flows in spherical shells. In Physics of Rotating Fluids (ed. Egbers, C. & Pfister, G.), Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 549, pp. 295–316. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollerbach, R. 2001 Super- and counter-rotating jets and vortices in strongly magnetic spherical Couette flow. In Dynamo and Dynamics, a Mathematical Challenge (ed. Chossat, P., Armbruster, D. & Oprea, I.), NATO Science Series II, vol. 26, pp. 189–197. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollerbach, R., Canet, E. & Fournier, A. 2007 Spherical Couette flow in a dipolar magnetic field. Eur. J. Mech B 26 (6), 729–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollerbach, R. & Skinner, S. 2001 Instabilities of magnetically induced shear layers and jets. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457, 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Malcolm, D. G. 1968 Some electrically driven flows in magnetohydrodynamics. Part 2. Theory and experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 33 (4), 775–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Shercliff, J. A. 1971 Magnetohydrodynamics at high Hartmann number. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 3, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, D. H., Triana, S. A., Zimmerman, D. A., Tilgner, A. & Lathrop, D. P. 2007 Inertial waves driven by differential rotation in a planetary geometry. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 101, 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizerski, K. A. & Bajer, K. 2007 On the effect of mantle conductivity on the super-rotating jets near the liquid core surface. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 160, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, U. & Bühler, L. 2001 Magnetofluiddynamics in Channels and Containers. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nataf, H.-C., Alboussière, T., Brito, D., Cardin, P., Gagnière, N., Jault, D., Mason, J.-P. & Schmitt, D. 2006 Experimental study of super-rotation in a magnetostrophic spherical Couette flow. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 100, 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. H. 1967 a An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics. Longmans.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. H. 1967 b Singularities of Hartmann layers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 300, 94–107.Google Scholar
Shercliff, J. A. 1953 Steady motion of conducting fluids in pipes under transverse magnetic fields. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 49, 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shercliff, J. A. 1956 The flow of conducting fluids in circular pipes under transverse magnetic fields. J. Fluid Mech. 1 (6), 644–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soward, A. M. & Dormy, E. 2007 Boundary and shear layers in rotating (MHD) flows. In Mathematical Aspects of Natural Dynamos (ed. Dormy, E. & Soward, A. M.), The Fluid Mechanics of Astrophysics and Geophysics (series ed. Soward, A. M. & Ghil, M.), vol. 13, pp. 121–151. Grenoble Sciences and CRC Press.Google Scholar
Starchenko, S. V. 1998 a Magnetohydrodynamic flow between insulating shells rotating in strong potential field. Phys. Fluids 10, 2412–2420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starchenko, S. V. 1998 b Strong potential field influence on slightly differentially rotating spherical shells. Stud. Geoph. Geod. 42, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1966 On almost rigid rotation. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. S. 1981 Magnetohydrodynamic flows in rectangular ducts with thin conducting walls. J. Méc. 20 (1), 79–112.Google Scholar
Zatmann, S. 2001 Phase relations for high frequency core mantle coupling and the Earth's axial angular momentum budget. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 121, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar